similar to: can't ping to an internal IP through tinc's virtual interfaces

Hi: First of all, thanks for this great piece of software! I found very clear the presentation sheets used at Linux Expo, Amsterdam. :-) About my problem, I setup everything to connect our two boxes. If I type 'ifconfig' I can see them up. Also the routes. ISIvirtual - Our firewall (iptables) which connects to the Internet through ADSL with a public dynamic IP. (the SSL client)

AUGHHHHH I accidentally sent that message below before changing my from address to jason+tinclist@truedesign.com ... now my "real" address is on http://mail.nl.linux.org/tinc/2003-07/maillist.html where it is just begging to be harvested by spambots looking for addresses to add to their spam lists. I've tried so hard to keep my address spam free for a long time (and I've been

Hi I have two different IP addresses (in a block of /29), one is on port 0 and the other is on port 2 of a Ciso 888. I am doing this so I can have two different certs with two different ip addresses. I have tried: 1) one machine, two real interfaces, two cables (eth0 and eth2) 2) one machine, one real interface eth0 and one virtual interface eth0:1, one network cable Using number 2) I can

Hi, I implemented a little client server scenario with tinc to give a notebook (connected to the "Server" via WLAN) access to the local lan (both Linux OS). I'll try to explain the problem I got: The configuration seems to be ok: The tinc-connection is set up correctly and after it is set up, the server can ping the client. The problem is, that after the connection is startet the

Still experimenting with the automesh function. In the midst of that, I encountered a new problem. Of the 6 linux boxes in my tinc VPN, 3 were RedHat 9, 1 was Suse 9 Pro, 1 was Fedora Core 1, and one was RedHat 8.0. All was well. They were running a mix of the static binary and locally compiled-from-source binaries. I updated two of the RedHat 9 boxes to Fedora Core 1, about 3 days

Dear developers, I am interested in understanding in more details how tinc's metaprotocol works. I apologize in advance if this was already described somewhere, I could not find it in the mailing list archive. So let's say machine A has a Address= ip.b.example and manages to contact server B via the meta connection. 1) Then B's tinc daemon will send to A edge and subnet

Hello all, For your information, below are some "bugs" (possible optimizations?), all related, for tinc's initialization in systemd. Since both RedHat and Debian recent distros have switched to systemd,**please** make sure that a solid initialization mechanism is included in precompiled .rpm and .deb packages (CentOS, Debian, Fedora, etc.)

Hi there! I'm totally new to the concept 'self-made VPNs' :P I've discovered tinc and I think it's not as easy as hamachi, but not so hard as OpenVPN :D Now: I've got 4 questions: question n.1: I'm behind a router. This router is configurable, but I'm also behind a provider's NAT (private IPs with a common public IP). Will tinc work, or it will do as

Hi all, hi Guus, in july 2004 i received an e-mail from you concerning the way a packet takes across a (tinc)vpn: > They are forwarded from eth0 to tap0, but the kernel doesn't know that > tinc is forwarding them from tap0 to ippp0. So, the UDP and TCP > packets that tinc sends will be seen by the OUTPUT chain instead of > the FORWARD chain. At the other end, the received UDP

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2281 Bug ID: 2281 Summary: sshd accepts empty arguments in ForceCommand and VersionAddendum Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd

Hi, now, I'm working with the last version of dovecot and pigeonhole sieve, and when apply a sieve filter on a new message, and it try to move this mail to a folder with special character like accent give me the error 'mailbox name not utf-8: ...' >Aug 17 09:22:40 imap1 dovecot: lmtp(19629,miel): Error: kea6K484akytTAAAJBW4rA: sieve: msgid=

Hello all, this is what happens when I attempt to ping both search engines: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/168484871 One has 100% packet loss, the other none. Here is my route -n: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/219711338 Also, this is my iptables -L output: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/2102713387 This is a 64-bit virtual machine running on Azure, OpenLogic CentOS 6.3. If more info is needed,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102722 Bug ID: 102722 Summary: [regression] changing resolution hangs the display on Lenovo Thinkpad p51 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium

Hi, I hope someone could help me out. Pls find the details below. dom0: ifconfig before "xend start" eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:76:53:44:FB inet addr:10.0.0.3 <http://10.0.0.3> Bcast:10.0.0.255 <http://10.0.0.255>Mask: 255.255.255.0 <http://255.255.255.0> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX

Hello. Since upgrading to libvirt-1.1.2 i get this error: 2013-09-03 08:29:55.258+0000: 2281: error : virDBusCallMethod:1156 : The name org.freedesktop.machine1 was not provided by any .service files Also live migration doesn't seem to work anymore. There is no error except the above one but the machine is not accessible anymore after migration. The machine is running if i believe

I''ve setup Xen 3.0.2-2 (binary install) on Ubuntu 6.06, got my domUs up and running, got them connected to the Internet but I can''t even ping to any of these VMs. Now I''m not linux/xen genious but could the problem be that xen-br0 doesn''t have an IPv4 address? (it''s got an IPv6 address) Since I don''t use IPv6 on my network this seems a

Hi Centos Users # ping 10.104.89.146 connect: Invalid argument The Server has normal network connectivity. I ssh into it over this interface. Strace output on Pastebin [0]. SELinux is disabled. Centos 4.3 cheers Simon [0] http://pastebin.com/m720052a8 -- XMPP: sjolle at swissjabber.org

Has anyone else noticed with CentOS 5, that ping now starts at icmp_seq 1 instead of 0. It's clearly not a problem, just curious if anyone knows why it changed. Graham

> > Hi, > > I'm running a 2.4.18-14 kernel with a heavy IO profile using > ext3 over RAID 0+1 volumes. > > From time to time I get a black screen stuck machine while > trying to umount a volume during an IO workload (as part of a > failback solution - but after killing all IO processes ), > with ping still responding, but everything else mostly dead. >

> > Hi, > > The problem reproduces on a 2.4.18-19 kernel as well. Took > some more time but finally it roared its ugly head. > > This is the stack trace from the new kernel: > > > c01190b8 f3791eb4 set_running_and_schedule > > c010a8b0 f3791ed0 enable_irq > > c014200c f3791f0c IO_APIC_get_PCI_irq_vector > > c0155595 f3791f0c clear_inode >