similar to: BindToInterface = interface [experimental]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:21:08AM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > Oops, I got it to work only after putting the WAN on port 656 so it > did not interfere with port 655 for the LAN. You should not need to have two tinc daemons just because you have a WAN and a LAN interface. By default (ie, if you don't specify BindToAddress and/or BindToInterface), tinc listens on all interfaces,

Hi, I've stumbled upon a problem which I can't solve easily with the available options in tinc - at least as far as I see. If enlightenment is all I need, I'll happily accept pointers ;) I try to establish a connection between two hosts. Each host has multiple addresses assigned to it's internet interface. A stripped down list would be: Host 1: 2001:780:0:1e::1

Hi I'm trying to implement a scheme in which the nodes will have a direct UDP tunnel to each other. First, all nodes make connection with one public node, and then make connections with each other. And I came across the following problem: Remotely located nodes can establish a direct UDP connection, but the nodes that are in the same local network can not, and all traffic goes through the

My Internet gateway is using ADSL PPPoE connection with dynamic public IP assigned by ISP. My Internet gateway is Redhat AS3 U2, shorewall 2.0.9 As my ISP provided 4 simultaneous pppoe dailup connection for the same physical adsl line. My linux server can be configured for multiple pppoe connection i.e. ppp0, ppp1, ppp2, ppp3 Is it possible of shorewall to assigned say ppp0''s IP is

No parameters using DNS. - tinc.conf content Name = sito1 AddressFamily = ipv4 BindToAddress = <IPPUB>:665 BindToInterface = int Device=/dev/net/tun Interface = vpndrif Mode = router PingInterval = 60 PingTimeout = 5 ProcessPriority = normal - host/sito1 content Address = <IPPUB>:665 Subnet = <IPLOCAL>/<NETMASK> Port = 655 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- ... -----END

Hi ! Recently i switched my internet provider, to get more speed but another braindead setup regarding public ip addresses. I now have 4 PPTP Tunnel available, of which i''m using one as the gateway ip doing masquerading to other machines in my local lan, excluding three other machines, which i would like to use 1:1 nat to get them a direct access to one of the pptp tunnels. I was

Hi Ppl I have 5 adsl lines that after reading quite a bit i managed to get load balanced now abvoiusly it doesnt load balance evenly and this works on what routes are still in the routing cache. my question is my outbound masquerading had to be modified to use snat in iptables instead of just plain masquerading my outbound masquerading now works but my inbound port forwarding doesnt work would

I have a private lan that is connected to the world via 3 dsl lines. I put up a linux box that handles all the dsl lines, lan gateway and all is working well...until...one of the dsl lines goes down. My routing table is: x.x.x.x dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp1 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x x.x.x.x dev ppp2 proto kernel scope link src x.x.x.x

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gus & Tinc-VPN List: It looks like I need to run 2 instances of tincd on each server. 1 instance of tincd will responsible for running a VPN over the LAN on eth1. This means Class C addresses from 10.0.1.10 -> 10.0.1.250 Another instance of tincd will be responsible for running a VPN over the WAN on eth0. This means Class C addresses from

Hello, I set up a tinc vpn network with tinc 1.0pre5 on Mandrake 8.1 Please take note of the following troubles i noticed 1) In the config files, the name of the variables are case sensitive 2) the BindToInterface seems to be faulty. I removed the line, now everything work, except the security aspect.. 3) I HAD to add a Subnet=<full address of the local tinc device> in the hosts file, or

Hí everybody, you have a nice day. I am configuring accounting in shorewall /etc/shorewall/accounting and the traffic between eth0 (local network)1, eth2(local network2) and eth3(local network3) &lt;--&gt; eth1(ip public network), works fine. I make the accounting because y want to control the remote vpn access(pptpd) throught shorewall. Which is the way to control vpn /ip/access in

yes, this is a crazy subject. I have 4 ADSL lines to the same provider, which even have the same gateway. Those lines are connected to the same machine (more crazyness: even connected to the same nic. it works fine, I swear). this machine will serve this conenction to a local net. so, I setup the ifaces correctly, everything works. I add balancing using this command: # ip route replace default

Here''s my situation: I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has 4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used and they are as follows: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport

Guus: Ok, I accept your challenge. But I am clueless in terms of getting the routing table correct. So each server has a dual identity, both a LAN private identity with a PRIVATE IP address and a WAN public identify with a PUBLIC ip address. And how to have 2 different tun devices show up in the ifconfig -a so that LAN IP address can be assigned to the tun0 and a WAN IP address can be assigned

First off, thanks to all who have made tinc possible and continue to work developing it. I hope perhaps in time I can become a useful part of this community. :) I'm having an interesting issue with tincctl and was hoping someone could shed some light on it. Everything seems to work correctly when I build for OSX; however on linux and windows builds, I always receive connection

That could have gone smoother. I had many problems with the NFS install on my firewall then once I got the server back up, mail delivery was broken :- ( I still haven''t gotten ulogd to run under RH9.0 but everything else seems to be working ok... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

please, help, i have build vpn server (suse 9 + poptop), i have managed to implement tc htb in ip-up script, but every client has own ppp interface (ppp0, ppp1, ppp2...), and my idea is to share available bandwidth, not to limit connection, how to build root tc rule, when I have more then one interface?... please any one width experiance regards _______________________________________________

Hi I've compiled Tinc 1.0.2 from source but I'm having trouble. Not only am I having disconnections all the time (could be a network issue however) but even worse, Tinc is ignoring my MaxTimeout = 60 and is waiting longer and longer and longer (logfile shows it at 120 seconds). Is this a bug or have i misconfigured anything? best regards Marco Amrein Dec 5 11:25:12 frank

REMOVE yourself for mthe list!!!!!!!!!!!! Hint: what text is repeated twice in the following message (three times if you got it from the mailing list)? PS the filtering is apparently not working. (and neither is the ignoring). :) On Sunday, 25 February 2001 at 18:46, Albi Rebmann wrote: > > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' > >

Hi, Thanks to John Wice for helping me with an earlier question. My two PCs behind the same router are still having problems connecting. Would appreciate thoughts on what I?m doing wrong? Router: Port 655 forwarded to 192.168.1.45, both TCP and UDP Port 656 forwarded to 192.168.1.51, both TCP and UDP Machine #1. ========== Local IP address on LAN = 192.168.1.45 Windows Firewall