Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "trouble routing packets"
2000 Jun 12
0
TINC 1.0pre2: unable to access one private network (fwd)
Voor de duidelijkheid...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 16:14:37 -0500
From: gbarnett <gbarnett@satx.rr.com>
To: guus@sliepen.warande.net
Subject: TINC 1.0pre2: unable to access one private network
Guus... I couldn't seem to get this to the mail list... could you post it
and/or answer it for me?
Thx.
I have been having problems configuring TINC
2000 Aug 03
1
tinc config(?) problems
I'm having a bit of a problem getting tinc up and running between a pair of
RedHat (one 6.0, the other 6.1) boxes. It's installed and configured to the
point where they can connect, but I'm not seeing any traffic passing
between the two systems.
System A looks like -
tinc.conf:
# Sample tinc configuration.
# Insert your own ip numbers instead of the placeholders,
# and be sure to use
2002 Mar 07
3
I can't ping across gateway
Hi Who concern,
I setup TINC VPN follow these.
192.168.1.x / 24 (Client groups)
|
192.168.1.1 (eth1)
(GW1)
202.44.34.206 (eth0)
||
Internet
||
202.44.45.14 (eth0)
(GW2)
192.168.2.1 (eth1)
2002 Jul 07
2
Metadata socket and net2str() error
Hello there,
I was hoping that maybe one of you guys could help me out with a problem I'm
experiencing with tinc1.0pre7.
First, I'll start with my configuration, after that I'll explain my problem.
Background
----------
This is a simple, client-server situation on a private network. Both
machines run the same Debian Woody 3.0 testing installation and both have
identical packages
2000 Jun 27
1
[CVS] humbolt:/tinc/cabal/src net.c netutl.c protocol.c
> - Indirectdata finally REALLY REALLY works now!
> - More precise debug messages
Hmmm ... I can't prove that using the CVS code I checked out this morning.
Everything works like yesterday: I can ping the peer but I canot go beyond:
*** SERVER ***
Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]: tincd 1.0pre3 (Jun 27 2000 08:53:56)
startin
g, debug level 4
Jun 27 09:04:56 lemon tinc.9[10186]:
2009 Jan 14
1
RE: return codes ?
Hey I have just installed Samba 3.2.7 on my Debian 4.0 with compile.
But I'm trying to to join my Windows AD, and samba returns
Using short domain name -- UNDERVISNING
Joined 'MAIL' to realm 'UNDERVISNING.LOCAL'
return code = 0
First I got
return code = -1 I just assumed that this was bad, so I powered on, but now I get return code = 0 but I still can't get any user
2005 Aug 05
9
Problem with openvpn/bridged connection.
Hey all,
I''m trying to setup roadwarrior connection to my internal network. So
I''ve setup openvpn to create a tap0 connection and also have bridged
the eth1 (leads to my internal computers 192.168.2.10-30 and tap0
which is the VPN connection. On my shorewall setup I have br0 maped to
zone loc and eth0 to be my internet and I have masqing on my br0 to
get my internal computers
2008 Jul 30
1
tinc and wireless mesh
Hello!
I'm trying to make a wireless mesh network with b.a.t.m.a.n. protocol,
and I would like to secure the wireless links with tinc. My test network
is 2 wireless routers with OpenWRT Kamikaze firmware, and the network
topology is the following:
|CLIENT|eth0: 192.168.180| <--> |eth0: 192.168.1.1|MESH-NODE|ath0:
192.168.5.54| <~~> |ath0: 192.168.5.51|GW|eth1: 192.168.1.51|
2000 Jul 08
1
Problems starting up tincd with startupscript 1.0pre2-1.i386.rpm
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a vpn using tinc, so I installed tinc with the rpm version on my firewall as a listener. Setting up the tap device is no problem. The file /etc/tinc/tinc.conf looks like:
TapDevice = /dev/tap0
MyVirtualIP = 192.168.2.1/24
Vpnmask = 255.255.255.0
When I start the script /etc/rc.d/init.d/tinc start it says something about missing /etc/tinc/nets.boot
2001 Jun 01
2
Error: cannot route packet - please help
Hi,
I?m fighting with a silly problem: my syslog tells me tinc cannot route
a packet. I can use a telnet or the good ol ping, it is the same effect.
When I?m pinging from the laptop (172.16.11.2) the network address
(172.16.11.0) or any address numerically lower than the laptops address,
the packet gets routed, otherwise not. And when I ping the network
address, I get the reply twice, as to be
2002 Apr 25
1
Routing between two tunnels
Hi!
Me and two friends are trying to get a VPN working, but we cant get routing
between two tunnels.
This is how it looks, all servers (192.168.*.1) are running IP Masquerade to
enable the other computers behind them to access the internet.
Both elayne and glenn are connecting to melc, and the tunnel between melc
and glenn are running TCPOnly because that glenn doesnt have a public IP
(it's
2019 Mar 13
0
Re: KVM-Docker-Networking using TAP and MACVLAN
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:10:40PM +0100, Lars Lindstrom wrote:
>Hi everyone!
>
>I have the following requirement: I need to connect a set of Docker
>containers to a KVM. The containers shall be isolated in a way that they
>cannot communicate to each other without going through the KVM, which
>will act as router/firewall. For this, I thought about the following
>simple setup
2016 May 24
5
IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD
Hello,
I already consulted related lists @freebsd.org [1,2] but I have remained
unsuccessful to solve the following issue: VPN works for an internal
IPv4 subnet, but I doesn't for an internal IPv6 subnet with ULAs. To be
honest, I don't have any experience setting up a local IPv6; so I guess
that I'm doing something wrong here.
For those that know FreeBSD: The main aim is to connect
2002 Oct 03
1
VPN behind masquerading firewall 1.Opre7
Dear Tinc developer,
I have some problems connecting to the other site of the VPN
Here are my configuration files on pc1
Configuration files on pc2
/usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc.conf
/usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc.conf
Name = pc1 Name = pc2
TapDevice = /dev/tap0 TapDevice =
/dev/tap0
PrivateKeyFile =
2004 Oct 15
1
mark & owner for local connections
Hi,
Host A has two interfaces: eth0, tap0.
I want that all locally generated traffic from user 1004 goes through
tap0.
This is what I did:
iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -m owner --uid-owner 1004 -j MARK --set-mark 2
echo 202 bigmac.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables
ip rule add fwmark 2 table bigmac.out
ip route add default via 10.0.0.1 dev tap0 table bigmac.out
ip route flush cache
2001 Jun 22
1
book on tinc
Hi Ivo and Guus,
We are writing a book on building VPNs for Linux and a part of it describes
tinc. I wanted to make sure that your opinion, as tinc authors and
developers, is reflected.
First, let me ask a couple of technical questions.
1.
If there are two hosts, foo and bar, that are to be connected via tinc, and
each host should only have _one_ IP address (i.e. nmask is /32), would the
2001 Feb 22
1
tincd running, but ping test doesn't work!
Hi Tinc Mailing Group,
I've got Tinc-1.0pre3 set up on two Redhat Linux 6.2 / kernel 2.2.18
servers. It compiles okay, it reads the configuration files okay, it
makes a valid connection between the two tincd daemons. However, it
does not route data from one subnet to the other subnet. I will
describe my setup below, and if anyone can suggest why it is not
working, can they please reply to put
2015 Apr 11
2
workaround to use tinc as default gateway
I have been delighted by tinc. Building a mesh like I need would have
been horrible in OpenVPN. tinc makes it easy.
I decided to share a workaround for a problem that's been vexing me.
Either I'm being dumb (and can do this better with a hint) or this is
something others might need.
I've been moving a bunch of services from our university to Amazon
(EC2). To do this, I bring
2000 Nov 22
1
Configuration Trouble
I have succeeded in getting two tinc1.0pre3 hosts to connect, but I can't
ping one from the other. I can ping the local tap interfaces. tcpdump shows
that icmp echo requests are received by the other host, but no replies are
sent. The two hosts are North and South. It is the same pinging North to
South and South to North. The hosts are configured as follows:
South:
Debian 2.2
2019 Mar 12
2
KVM-Docker-Networking using TAP and MACVLAN
Hi everyone!
I have the following requirement: I need to connect a set of Docker
containers to a KVM. The containers shall be isolated in a way that they
cannot communicate to each other without going through the KVM, which
will act as router/firewall. For this, I thought about the following
simple setup (as opposed to a more complex one involving a bridge with
vlan_filtering and a seperate VLAN