similar to: tinc and RedHat 7

Hi all, I just uploaded tinc 1.0pre1 to the server. I included and rpm, which has been made possible by the work of Lubom?r Bulej and Mads Kiilerich. Please test this version, so that any bugs left can be squished before 1.0 gets final. Also be aware that this version includes a new version of the protocol, and is thus NOT compatible with the protocol that 0.3 uses. Thanks for flying tinc.

Hi all, I just uploaded tinc 1.0pre1 to the server. I included and rpm, which has been made possible by the work of Lubom?r Bulej and Mads Kiilerich. Please test this version, so that any bugs left can be squished before 1.0 gets final. Also be aware that this version includes a new version of the protocol, and is thus NOT compatible with the protocol that 0.3 uses. Thanks for flying tinc.

Hi all, It seemed like a good idea to post updates here every now and then about the progress of the development of tinc. Right now, we're mainly hunting bugs. While doing this, we stumbled upon some shortcomings of the meta protocol, possibly dangerous. So Guus and I are now working on a new protocol, which will be incompatible with the standing 0.3 protocol (version 4). Whether or not

Mads Kiilerich wrote: > Right now at this moment we have reached a level where I have > no further patches! :-) great! :) Guus is now doing a last protocol change, after that is tested, I'm going to make 1.0pre1 official, including an rpm (deb will have to wait due to some difficulties). > I don't think a configuration program will be needed. VPN is not > for

Viraj Alankar wrote: > I've successfully setup tinc-1.0pre1 but I notice on my firewall > that it requires fragmented UDP packets to be let in in order to work > properly. Is there any way to avoid this? [ This is true. We don't inherit the DF (Don't Fragment) flag onto the UDP data, so path MTU discovery doesn't work. We have to fix this. ] Yes, you can avoid this

Hi all, 1.0pre2 is there. [ I just noticed the included ChangeLog is empty -- oh well. ] * This version has been internationalized; and a Dutch translation has been included. * Two configuration variables have been added: * VpnMask - the IP network mask for the entire VPN, not just our subnet (as given by MyVirtualIP). The Redhat and Debian packages use this variable in their

Hi all, 1.0pre2 is there. [ I just noticed the included ChangeLog is empty -- oh well. ] * This version has been internationalized; and a Dutch translation has been included. * Two configuration variables have been added: * VpnMask - the IP network mask for the entire VPN, not just our subnet (as given by MyVirtualIP). The Redhat and Debian packages use this variable in their

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 Summary: regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with -- link-dest Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 URL: http://rsync.samba.org OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core

I was told that my writeup lacked an example and details so I reproduced the code that X uses and I was able to boil down the issue to a couple of lines of code. Sorry again for the length of this email. Code was compiled on OpenBSD with clang 3.0-release. ======================================================================== With -O0 which works as X expects:

Hi, I have a dataset called 'fish'. fish$Species returns extract 1. When I use fish$Species != c("CRA","PHC"), i.e. I want all species except "CRA" and "PHC", I get extract 2 which is blatantly wrong. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? Regards, James EXTRACT 1 > fish$Species [1] ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB ALB

Hi I can''t get heckle working. In fact, I''ve built an example so simple that it either shows a bug, or I am being really, REALLY stupid. Heckle does not appear to support RSpec directly, so I''m trying to use spec --heckle (RSpec trunk as of 10 mins ago, Heckle 1.4.1). I''ve constructed this pair of sample files: 18> ~/Desktop/heckle_test % cat

Announcing Moo-Tiff for FreeBSD 2.1. Sender: owner-freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Moo-Tiff is a 100% compatible port of OSF/Motif 2.0 for FreeBSD 2.1, built from the official OSF sources and run through the OSF VTS (Validation Test Suite). If it works with OSF/Motif 2.0 on any platform, it can now work on FreeBSD 2.1 with Moo-Tiff ! Moo-Tiff is priced at

Hi Code with a large number of different paths is probably the biggest problem I have right now. I''ve made a sample class that illustrates the simplest case of one parameter that takes two values: class DataStorer def initialize(logger, emailer, db_updater, do_update_db_step) @logger = logger; @emailer = emailer; @db_updater = db_updater

Sorry for reposting, i keep forgetting this should be plain text. Will not make this mistake again Hello, The following code moo <- function(a=1){ x=1; x=x+y} funs <- new.env() enter <- function(type, v, e, w){ assign(v, TRUE, funs) } library(codetools) collectUsage(moo, enterGlobal = enter) adds + to the environment funs i.e. funs: "=" "{" "+"

Hi, I have a table laid out something like this: <table> <thead> <tr> <th>col 1</th> <th>col 2</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody id="tablebody"> <tr> <td>moo</td> <td>moo</td> </tr> <tr> <td>moo</td> <td>moo</td> </tr>

Hello folks, I had an ext3 filesystem mounted as the root of a Linux MOO server. Unfortunately, the filesystem was on one of the infamous DTLA-3070xx drives - and the drive decided to fail at the worst moment it possibly could, trashing the filesystem fairly well. The situation is as follows: I used dd_rescue to create an image of what is left of the filesystem, but I ended up with some 65MB

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770 Summary: ipt_REJECT: multi-directional tcp-reset Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hi, I am trying to get an fedora core 2(samba-3.0.3-5) export mounted as cifs on a fedora core 3 test 1(kernel-2.6.7-1.478, samba-3.0.5-0pre1.0). It always gives an error operation not permitted. [root@ayanami1 root]# mount -t cifs -o user=moo,password=cow //ayanami3/ moo /mnt/cow mount error 1 = Operation not permitted Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) I

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 Summary: rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression? Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: mej@lbl.gov

"j.emerlik" <j.emerlik at gmail.com> writes: > I would like to prepare postlogin a script that allow imap connection to > roundcube for all but restrict imap access for selected users. "from" roundcube? > Is possible in condition IF use IP addresses as range or with mask (because > I've more than one web servers) ? Of course -- many ways to skin this