similar to: tinc

Guus Sliepen wrote: > - Added TCP_NODELAY and IPTOS_LOWDELAY options for meta sockets. Maybe it's better to make these optional? -- Ivo Timmermans --- TINC development list, tinc-devel@nl.linux.org Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/tinc-devel/

Guus Sliepen wrote: > Spanish translation removed. Nobody maintains it, and it is severely > outdated. Maybe it encourages people to update it if you leave it? Maybe place a comment somewhere visible saying that we would like to have it updated? -- Ivo Timmermans - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site:

Hello everyone, Today is exactly 10 years ago that tinc 1.0 was released. I would have hoped to celebrate this by releasing 1.0.22 and 1.1pre8 today, but this will instead happen in one week. Tinc 1.1 is close to becoming stable, and I hope to release 1.1.0 before the end of the year. The main features of tinc 1.1 are the improved security over tinc 1.0, and a much nicer interface that makes it

Hello everyone, Today is exactly 10 years ago that tinc 1.0 was released. I would have hoped to celebrate this by releasing 1.0.22 and 1.1pre8 today, but this will instead happen in one week. Tinc 1.1 is close to becoming stable, and I hope to release 1.1.0 before the end of the year. The main features of tinc 1.1 are the improved security over tinc 1.0, and a much nicer interface that makes it

Sending your passphrase encrypted is all fine, but tinc sends the key with which it was encrypted about a second later... Anyone being able to intercept these two requests is authorized on the VPN. We need asymmetric authentication _now_. -- Ivo Timmermans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Hi Ivo, --On Freitag, 23. Juni 2000 01:15 +0200 Ivo Timmermans <zarq@icicle.yi.org> wrote: > I'm not sure I fully understand your patch. This is not so important since I'm trying to get 1.0pre2 running. Although I had no luck so far, I'll point out what's going wrong at the end of this mail. > For instance, you force a > key exchange when the connection is made,

Although we (the authors of tinc) have done our best to make tinc as secure as possible, an unfortunate combination of encryption and key exchange techniques has created a hole in at least all versions of tinc >= 0.3, including the current CVS version. Exploit: If somebody can intercept the meta protocol to a host that is running a tinc daemon, it is possible to decrypt the passphrase, which

Although we (the authors of tinc) have done our best to make tinc as secure as possible, an unfortunate combination of encryption and key exchange techniques has created a hole in at least all versions of tinc >= 0.3, including the current CVS version. Exploit: If somebody can intercept the meta protocol to a host that is running a tinc daemon, it is possible to decrypt the passphrase, which

Hi, here's a small list of things that need to be done, and the version when it should be ready. smartcard support 1.1 LDAP support 1.1 public/private keys for authentication 1.1 don't store passphrases in files that are called after IP addresses 1.0 use names to identify

Hello everyone, I am running into the following error messages everytime I try to use a docker overlay network on top of tinc-vpn: Error getting read result from Windows tap device {F30C422F-4524-435F-A15B-71A7E08C260D}: (995) The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request. Received packet of 106 bytes from ... (... port 655) Writing packet of 106

I've not had success with using tinc and docker together. I came up against similar problems. Docker iptables in Linux seem quite complicated as well, messing with the network stack. I've seen a few tinc docker images that run tinc as a container - I haven't tried this. Please let us know if you do actually get it working - im very interested to know. Mike On 20 May 2018 12:55 am,

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:51:53AM +0100, Marcel Loesberg wrote: > I'm going to build a VPN and I want to use either Tinc or FreeS/WAN. > I've started building the VPN with FreeS/WAN and I find things are getting > rather complicated. > I looks like Tinc is much easier to configure but in the FAQ and in what I've > seen of the documentation so far there is no mention of

Hi Marc, A number of bugs have been found and fixed in the code that deals with Windows devices in tinc 1.1: https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/169 https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/173 https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/174 https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/181 https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/pull/182 Unfortunately, these fixes have not made it in a tinc 1.1 release yet, but

Hi everybody, I'm looking into replacing the linked lists in tinc with balanced trees. Using balanced trees will greatly improve performance for medium to large VPNs. As I see it, there are several options: 1) Use tsearch()/twalk()/etc functions from glibc. + It is in a very standard library - It relies solely on callback functions, which sometimes results in ugly, awkward code (I

Hi all, I just uploaded tinc 1.0pre1 to the server. I included and rpm, which has been made possible by the work of Lubom?r Bulej and Mads Kiilerich. Please test this version, so that any bugs left can be squished before 1.0 gets final. Also be aware that this version includes a new version of the protocol, and is thus NOT compatible with the protocol that 0.3 uses. Thanks for flying tinc.

Hi all, I just uploaded tinc 1.0pre1 to the server. I included and rpm, which has been made possible by the work of Lubom?r Bulej and Mads Kiilerich. Please test this version, so that any bugs left can be squished before 1.0 gets final. Also be aware that this version includes a new version of the protocol, and is thus NOT compatible with the protocol that 0.3 uses. Thanks for flying tinc.

Hi all, I'm following the manual but I get the below error, and I believe tinc is clobbering my conf file. I've never set up VPN before, I'm just trying to connect to my work network from home. All the following is on my work computer. Thanks in advance for any help. $ ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:A0:17:3A:50 inet addr:172.24.104.145

Hello everybody, I have just released tinc 1.0pre4. Changes: - New authentication protocol (better security, and faster too). - TCPonly and IndirectData are back (but not fully tested). - Documentation revised, it's really up to date with the released package now. - tincd -K now stores public/private keys in PEM format, but keys of 1.0pre3 can still be used. - Faster and more secure

On Mon Apr 24 2000, Mike MacNeill <mikem@accesscomm.ca> wrote: > I downloaded the cabal version as well and I seem to have discovered a > problem. > > Whenever the regenerate key goes off it manages to eat memory somewhere. > > I set the regen time from 90 minutes to basically all day. > > Have you tried running this under efence? efence didn't show anything

Hi, I'm trying to set-up a VPN using Tinc 1.0pre3. When I start tincd I get the following in /var/log/messages. On the machine that listens for incomming connections: > Mar 16 17:23:24 vpn tinc[1168]: tincd 1.0pre3 starting > Mar 16 17:23:24 vpn tinc[1168]: Ready: listening on port 655 On the machine making the connection: > Mar 16 17:16:51 mail tinc[802]: tincd 1.0pre3 starting