similar to: Question on how to get involved in 1.1 development

1. The UDT library is a BSD-licensed accelerated UDP-based transport. Would tinc be able to use this for UDP-based connections and would the licensing be acceptable? http://udt.sourceforge.net/index.html 2. I would like to see a 3rd compression protocol added to tinc: one based on the Mahoney compression schemes would be worth investigating (need something fast and uses small RAM on

--- doc/tinc.conf.5.in | 3 +++ src/linux/device.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/tinc.conf.5.in b/doc/tinc.conf.5.in index 2bfd5fe..01f7f81 100644 --- a/doc/tinc.conf.5.in +++ b/doc/tinc.conf.5.in @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ a lookup if your DNS server is not responding. This does not affect resolving hostnames to IP addresses from the host

Hello, I am slowly working on the NHW codec, I think now that I will remove the (multistage) residual coding, because it consumes too much bits while leaving still some artifacts.Instead, it seems better to simply have a finer quantization (and use a quantization step of 4 instead of 8).For the higher compression settings, I will need a good "psycho-visual" quantization to know which

Hello, Linux has a recvmmsg() system call which allows to achieve several recvfrom() at a time. The patch below makes tinc use it (patch against 1.1-pre11). Basically the patch turns the handle_incoming_vpn_data variables into arrays (of size 1 when recvmmsg is not available, and thus compiled the same as before), and makes the code index into the arrays. You may want to use interdiff -w

aG93IHRvIGNoZWNrb3V0IHRoZSBsYXN0IGRldmVsb3AgdGluYz8gKENWUyxjb21wbGllIGFibGUp DQo= Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/ Tinc site: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

Sorry for the delayed response: been a busy weekend. SCTP looks very promising, and would make a hopefully stable mesh: I agree with your assessment in that regard vs optimized UDP setups. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCTP As for my request for improved compression, the "zpipe" implementation looks promising, as it is a high-level streaming compressor. I know most of the developers

I have 2 hosts, A and B. B is behind a NAT. TCP works, but when I attempt to use UDP, the following messages appears on A: Received UDP packet from unknown source x.x.x.x port 10192 This is not the port specified in the configuration, but I don't really understand why tinc should care about that. The security shouldn't depend on IP and port numbers, but on the crypto (MAC etc). So why

Hi, We want to deploy a tinc VPN, with more than 50 sites connected all arround the world. But we cannot trust all our sites with the same level, so the tinc solution (automatic full mesh) is "too automatic" for us : *any* node can add a new node which will be connected directly to others. A solution could be TLS (signing public keys), but create a PKI is another issue for us.

+0100 From: Daniel Schall <tinc-devel at mon-clan.de> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 17:00:35 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Improved PMTU discovery diff --git a/lib/dropin.c b/lib/dropin.c index 52fb5b8..2b803b1 100644 --- a/lib/dropin.c +++ b/lib/dropin.c @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ #endif =20 #ifdef HAVE_MINGW -int usleep(long usec) { - Sleep(usec / 1000); - return 0; -} +//int usleep(long usec) { +//

Hi Guus, while checking the source code, I stumbled upon PMTU Discovery. I've got a question regarding the process of sending/receiving PMTU packets. As I understand, the packet flow is like this: 1 .Tinc creates a packet with a specific payload length to send it as an PMTU probe. (The data part is just some random bytes.) 2. This packet gets compressed and sent

Hi to everybody, Can anybody tell me what packages I need to install Tinc 1.1pre2 in a server that it had installed a previous version installed? I tried to install it and when I execute the "make" it give me a lot of errors. Best regards, Ramses

Sure, I?ll see if we can narrow it down for you. > On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:25 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > > That's interesting. I'm using a near-HEAD tinc-1.1 myself and haven't > encountered this problem, but I think that's because I'm using it in > router mode, as opposed to switch mode. > > I'm trying to narrow

Hi, I'm currently trying to troubleshoot what appears to be a very subtle bug (most likely a race condition) in SPTPS that causes state to become corrupted during SPTPS key regeneration. The tinc version currently deployed to my production nodes is git 7ac5263, which is somewhat old (2014-09-06), but I think this is still relevant because the affected code paths haven't really changed

Dear Guus, I've attached my first git commit to your repository. It does not contain any new functionalities, but it is a first try to interact with your git copy. Could you please verify, if you can push this commit to your repository? If it works, I'll send you the rest of my work, which contains: 1) some small improvements in logging (using flags instead of counters) 2) the

Hi Guus, I know this comes up from time to time. So it is time to update our expectations. Is there a roadmap for a 1.1 backward compatibility already? -rsd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20141228/fcb2b44a/attachment.html>

Hi, The target I am working on does not support i8 loading: it supports only 32 bit aligned loads. I had to custom lower i8 load so that only i32 loads are generated. My issue is the following: In a very specific case, the lowering stage generates the following pattern where the load is a i32 load: (and (load x), 255) This pattern is somehow converted by the DAG combiner back to: (zextload x,

Hello, Guus Sliepen, on Wed 02 Dec 2015 13:53:37 +0100, wrote: > That's great! It would be good though to split > handle_incoming_vpn_data() into a function that does the actual > recvfrom/mmsg() and one that processes each individual packet, to reduce > the level of indentation and make the functions a bit more readable. > Then I'll merge it :) Here it is. Samuel

Hi, I am learning Radrails and want to tie the web project all together by displaying 3 tables linked together. I want to select one item from the main table, and then link to the other two tables. they will be linked by the key of the first table. It seems that I should create a rhtml in a main table or should I just copy the list.rhtml created by the generator scaffold? I might not make any

hello, i just finish writing my database. when i start working on the web design i just found that the connection between dreamweaver and database cannot be done even my file in dreamweaver is rails is that true or no? thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m looking at SCO OpenServer 5.0.6, for various reasons. I contacted Citrix, and they weren''t interested in pursuing it as a new virtualization platform, so I''m stuck with VMware. But I''m finding VMware to be less snappy than I remember Xen being for other operating systems (and I''ve tried RHEL on both systems), and to have less graceful overall