similar to: 1.0.14 error on Windows-XP

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "1.0.14 error on Windows-XP"

2006 Feb 07
1
REGARDING TO DOWNGRAING OCFS FROM 1.0.14-1 TO 1.0.9-12
Hi, all. My name is Kenichiro Ochi, in Oracle Japan Support. Customer examines upgrading OCFS from 1.0.9-12 to 1.0.14-1. And customer asked us a question about the way of downgrading to 1.0.9-12. (customer presumes a case in case after the upgrade.) We tested the following... 0.After the upgrade 1.umount OCFS volume on all nodes 2.uninstall rpm (V1.0.14-1) # rpm -e ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 # rpm
2009 Dec 15
1
Configure deliver to add ', S=<size>' to maildir message name
Hi, I want to use the zlib plugin to compress my mail storage. According to the wiki, only messages with size attribute in the message id should by compressed. If I added the size part, dovecot assumes it is a new message. While dovecot undertands the ',S=<size>' attribute (IMAP shows that size), I could not configure deliver to add the size to message name. I'm using
2010 Dec 25
4
[ win32utils-Bugs-28801 ] unclosed handle in Process.setpriority/getpriority
Bugs item #28801, was opened at 2010-12-25 11:02 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=28801&group_id=85 Category: win32-process Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Rafa? Michalski (royaltm) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: unclosed handle in Process.setpriority/getpriority Initial Comment: Using
2011 May 22
1
Problem connecting between debian and Ubuntu
Hi, I've two computers, one with Debian the other with Ubuntu. The Debian computer has v1.0.14, the Ubuntu v1.0.11. They do not manage to connect with error "wrong keylength": the Ubuntu computer sends a 512 byte key to the Debian computer which expects a 256 byte key. Is it expected ? Is there a configuration option somewhere that I've set differently on
2008 Jun 16
1
dovecot-auth assertion failed
Hello, I have been running some tests on a new Dovecot v1.0.13 server and have seen the following message appear in the logs a few times. It appears to occur when there are a lot of requests being sent to the LDAP servers from both Dovecot and Sendmail (I am guessing about this, since I have also seen "Server busy" messages regarding LDAP auth). dovecot: auth(default): file db-ldap.c:
2008 Apr 14
1
dovecot-deliver auth-master error
Hi all, I'm trying to get the sieve plugin to work, but with little result. I'm following http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA, http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix and http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve but it won't work. As I have virtual users from several virtual domains, I added the "virtual users - with lookup" section from http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA, but now dovecot fails
2008 Nov 06
5
(1.0.13) fsync failed: Disk quota exceeded for some accounts
Hello all, We've recently migrated the mail server used by our 5000 students, from Tru64/UW-IMAP/Procmail/Postfix/mbox to Debian Etch/Dovecot/Deliver/Postfix/Maildir E-mails are not stored directly on the server (except for index and control files), but on an NAS that exports the students' homedirs on NFS. Each student has a 100MB quota on the NAS. Here is the configuration : vega:~#
2006 Feb 27
1
Problems dialing to another Asterisk server
Hi, I have a problem dialing a SIP phone which is logged in as different Astesrik machine from the one I am working with. I want to call a phone in Another astersik machine in , if it answers, calling a SiP phone registered in my ASterisk: My dialplan is: [mariaSIP] exten => _1.,1,Wait(1) exten => _1.,2,Dial(SIP/6021@192.168.0.51:5038,20) exten => _1.,3,HangUp() exten =>
2005 Aug 04
3
Ocfs and EMC Powerpath
A couple years ago, we moved to Oracle RAC on Linux using ocfs that is SAN attached to an EMC CLARiiON. At the time, there was a reason that we did NOT use EMC's Powerpath (I just can't recall what that reason was). What I'd like to know is if there are any issues with introducing Powerpath now. * RHEL 2.1 AS * 2.4.9-e.38enterprise * ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.13-1 * EMC
2015 Aug 06
3
Asterisk uses "Anonymous", but why?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Murthy Gandikota <murthy64 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:07:35 -0500 > > From: rmudgett at digium.com > > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk uses "Anonymous", but why? > <snip> > >> Here
2010 Jul 17
1
AGI execution after Dial
Hello, I'm currently developing a simple asterisk application using SFS (Skype For SIP) which tries to call to an outbound number, play a message and read DMTF digits. My first approach used the Manager to originate calls and then called an agi script to deal with the rest. Anyway, this ended up being not so clear because the call did not start on the Originate extension that it was supposed
2002 Sep 04
2
uid transition and post-auth privsep (WAS Re: possible fundamental problem with tru64 patch) (fwd)
What do we loose by not having post-auth privsep? What code is executed between authorization and actual setting of the effective uid? On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford <harbaugh at nciaxp.ncifcrf.gov> said: > > It appears that the integration of the sia session setup will either > > have to be rethought or abandoned
2008 Mar 03
3
processus
Salut Alex. Peut tu me conseiller pour que je puisse renomer le processus et changer la priorité de mon application. merci. sebastien http://beusse.liveror.com/ _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users
2008 Mar 31
2
Allow_nets + MySQL failing when using range notation
Hello all, I am testing my dovecot installation in order to restrict access via POP3 for IPs outside my network. I have read and understood the instructions in the wiki and I have reached a configuration that works ONLY when single IPs are listed in allow_nets but not when ranges in the notation x.x.x.x/y are listed. Some examples should be more explanatory. I am using 1.0.rc15 patched as
2015 Aug 06
4
Asterisk uses "Anonymous", but why?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Murthy Gandikota <murthy64 at hotmail.com> wrote: > Tested with X-Lite and it worked fiine. Is there some way to replace > "Anonymous" with a config parameter? > > Thanks for your kind help > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: murthy64 at hotmail.com > > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com >
2013 Jan 21
6
the at command
I was trying to use the 'at' command. Does it not have "resolution" to the second? When I run it with 'at -f /tmp/tt.sh "01/21/2013 15:20:45" syntax error. Last token seen: 15:20 Garbled time How do I run a command in the future including "seconds". Thanks, Jerry
2000 Oct 15
1
Patch for Digital Unix SIA authentication
A while back, I sent in a patch that added Digital Unix SIA authentication to OpenSSH. Well, I just figured out that it didn't handle everything correctly (locked accounts could still log in). I thought I had checked that, but I guess I missed it. Anyway, here is a patch against OpenSSH 2.2.0p1 that fixes this. -- Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net> Systems and Network Administrator
2008 Jun 02
2
v1.0.14 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.14.tar.gz.sig Since v1.1.0 release is getting near, this could well be the last v1.0 release. I'll still fix important bugs, but if the bugfix is large or affects only few people it'll probably get fixed only in v1.1 releases. * mbox: Enable mail_privileged_group while creating INBOX. -
2008 Jun 02
2
v1.0.14 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.14.tar.gz.sig Since v1.1.0 release is getting near, this could well be the last v1.0 release. I'll still fix important bugs, but if the bugfix is large or affects only few people it'll probably get fixed only in v1.1 releases. * mbox: Enable mail_privileged_group while creating INBOX. -
2015 Aug 06
2
Asterisk uses "Anonymous", but why?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Murthy Gandikota <murthy64 at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:55:28 -0500 > > From: rmudgett at digium.com > > To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk uses "Anonymous", but why? > > > > > > > > On