similar to: Suggestion: use Open-Mesh/BATMAN to help with layer 2/3 routing?

Hi Michael, when I was looking for information on tinc in combination with IPv6, I also found your new tutorial at that time (earlier this month). Somehow a couple of things are less clear to me in the newer tutorial (maybe the nice network topology image is missing). OK, you added the unique local addresses to the setup. But I dont't get it how the routing is done in your setup. You

Hello, does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with -enable-multipath? I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP. Thanks, Cristi Carstea

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

Hello All, Does anyone happen to be running Quagga on CentOS 5 with SELinux in enforcing mode? Have you had to create SELinux policies or did it "just work" out of the box? (I'll get around to building this out on CentOS 6 as well.) I'm simply trying to write my config (for the zebra daemon) and it can't be written... Looks like this bug from Fedora 8 in 2008 [0] remains

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of

Hi, I''ve setup quagga on a shorewall firewall server. The only purpose for this is to use BGP to connect to a "peering platform" supplied by our data centre supplier. There are some very large ISP''s (and other various providers including google) on this peering platform and connecting to it will speed up access to/from our services and hosted servers. The physical

Hello,I am using ubuntu 11.10 , wine 1.3.36.i have installed batman arkham city from the dvd which i bought.when i try to run the game this error comes up http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=6nynjxw3s49aohf and here is the details http://tinypaste.com/e8becda2 here is the terminal log http://tinypaste.com/221ac935 i am using .Net 2.0 and gfwl.how can i fix this problem? please help

It doesn't run [Crying or Very sad] wingnux at wingnux-desktop ~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Eidos/Batman Arkham Asylum Demo/Binaries $ wine BmLauncher.exe err:ole:CoGetContextToken apartment not initialised fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System.Windows.Forms" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse L"System" fixme:shell:URL_ParseUrl failed to parse

tinc uses direct UDP communication for performance, not reliability. If you want to establish more metaconnections for increased reliability, you can use AutoConnect (though it probably won't work across NATs). A better solution is to use two central nodes (instead of one) for redundancy. On 11 June 2015 at 18:59, Daniel J. Grinkevich <danielgrinkevich at gmail.com> wrote: > If we

Here is the situation that I would like to create: Call comes in Receptionist sees that the caller ID is Jenny <8675309> Receptionist picks up phone and transfers call to Batman Batman looks at his phone and sees that the caller ID is Jenny <8675309> I can't seem to figure out how to forward the caller ID. Is this possible with Asterisk?

We have a handful of nodes set up. Some are NAT'd but a few have direct access to the Internet. Sample confs: HostA: Name = HostA AddressFamily = any Interface = tap0 Mode = switch Connectto = HostB GraphDumpFile = /tmp/mesh HostB: Name = HostB AddressFamily = any Interface = tap0 Mode = switch Connectto = HostA GraphDumpFile = /tmp/mesh And so on. If I use HostA as the main meta sever.

Hi There, we only have a /29 internet routable network from our ISP and a Cisco 1601 router with serial interface doing all the routing. I was thinking of replacing that cisco with a linux box with a sangoma card, also using quagga with ospf on for my internel networks has anyone have expierence with this? thanks Sew

Hello all, Some time before Christmas, a project was started. The task was to enhance an existing LiveCD solution with User-mode Linux. A number of requirements was stated, where the greatest challenge was to fit 10 virtual routers within an old no-name PC with only 256MB Ram. And the solution must still be run from a LiveCD. Thanks to Xen, the task was possible to complete. -But, what does it

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, yesterday I sent this eMail to quagga mailing list, however I didn't receive an answer yet. Unfortunately, I really need this stuff running or have to switch to another strategy achieving the goals. Maybe one of you has some experience on this topic and can shed some light on it -- I really appreciate it. -

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: normal If quagga is running, and I start & stop a domain, the VIF interface doesn't go down properly (in addition to other problems). Here's what I do: 1. Boot the computer. By default, quagga is running (zebra + ospfd). 2. xm create test7.cfg, wait until the domU starts. 3. xm shutdown test7, wait until the domU

Hey, I have a very trivial parsedfile based type - http://pastie.org/311146 - that works fine when deployed and run under puppetd -t. However, when being run by the daemonized puppet, it results in this error: Mon Nov 10 03:50:48 +0000 2008 //Node[ams-proxy-2]/quagga/Quagga::Daemon[zebra]/Quagga_service[zebra] (err): Failed to retrieve current state of resource: No ability to determine if

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE

Hello, Since the present tinc documentation is not very clear about this, please explain the following: is it mandatory to include the local IP address classes in the global VPN address class? Namely, please consider the following setup (which works great in practice): 1. A tinc VPN, full mesh, with n nodes (n > 3) 2. tinc runs on the firewall, which is also the default gateway for each

Hi list, I have a problem I thought was simple first, but now I''m stuck. In a nutshell, it''s about redundant uplinks at an outside location. Crude ASCII-Art follows: Internet | | +------------+ | cisco with | | uplinks | +------------+ | | ATM interface +----------+ ... | alvarion | | | wireless

I''m getting an error when shorewall is trying to add the default routes for my multi-isp configuration. I''ve attached a shorewall dump... If anyone can give some input I''d appreciate it. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument ERROR: Command "ip -4 route replace default scope global table 254 nexthop via 67.110.119.245 dev eth3 weight 1 nexthop via 66.29.181.113