similar to: "ConnectTo" to two server for fault-tolerance

Greetings- I'd like to configure multiple copper NICs on a server running CentOS 6.2 in a LAGG configuration for better throughput to the core switch. After quite a bit of searching, I'm not seeing anything of the sort. Is LAGG specific to the BSD world and the HP switches I'm running? Or, does it go by a different name? Bonding perhaps? If so, is bonding compatible with LAGG? --Tim

Well i'm using Ubuntu [Lucid] and running WoW via Wine [latest version] but there are some issues with the graphics, and moreso the lagg. Graphic issues: Black under players and npcs and Bugged textures for player armor and skin [Image: http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3918/screenshot1wj.png ] http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/3918/screenshot1wj.png Lagg Game laggs rly bad, like as if i

Hi, I have an Nvidia GTX 560 and I have my TV connected to it and get sound from the graphics-card to the TV. I'm using Ubuntu 11.04 and in the sound config I can choose to have the sound output simultaneous through the regular soundcard and through the Nvidia card out to my TV. However when I use that option the sound in Wine, only wine, starts to lagg like crazy. It's fine if I use

Ok.. so i heard playing WoW on linux often runs better than in windows but im having some trouble with bugs and glitches.. i tried setting graphics to openGL and turning the settings to minimum but to no avail. :/ I've also done the regedit and added the registry value but that just makes it crash or lagg to the point where it's unplayable. here's what it looks like: [Image:

Hi, Our company''s main line is quite busy the whole day and my shaping is working perfect, however even if I give icmp priority the pings still jump around quite a bit. We do have a backup line which hardly get used only if the main line drops. I''ve set ip rule to route all icmp through that and now the pings are perfect. Will this make a difference for the game players etc,

On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> said: >> - They?re serious server-grade machines, not borderline flimsy boxes competing largely on price. Built in and supported from Silicon Valley, not China. :) > > iXsystems sells rebadged SuperMicro stuff, nothing special (not made

I am running NUT as part of FreeNAS 9.2.0. I have looked through the manuals, but I don't see how to address my issue. The box has 4 NIC's in a LACP LAGG group. It takes a while for LACP to finish, and NUT tries to start before packets are flowing. NUT will complain endlessly about communication errors and never establish SNMP communication with my APC UPS. If I stop NUT and restart

well, I tried to narrow this down a bit by removing lagg from the equation, but the switch requires LACP to be active on those ports so I can't test in isolation unfortunately. Is anyone running 7.2 on a DL360 G5 with working ether ? -pete.

On 07/08/12 17:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:34:43 +0200 > From: Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Configure LAGG Interface? > To: centos at centos.org > Message-ID: <50201C53.2070300 at uni-x.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Am 06.08.2012 19:44, schrieb

Hello! I have encountered a bug using tincd with Microsoft Windows: Below you'll find my Setup and my Logs. In short, i do the following: 1. office running tincd 1.0.7 and waiting for connections (no ConnectTo, but this does not resolve the issue) 2. the supporter starts up tincd 1.0.7 on windows (native) 3. ping from windows ("support") to the office: Here the error occours:

[please use Reply-All to keep the list CC'd, thanks] On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Jason Gould <jgould at cddiagnostics.com> wrote: > Thanks. I should also mention the freenas server is setup with an lacp lagg. > > I will also mention that even when not setting pollfreq (leave as default) the issue still occurs. > It looks like the default for pollfreq is actually 30 on

Doug, Look at the list. It seems you and Nitesh Divecha may be having the same problem. Maybe you guys can confirm that you have the same issue and figure out what is in common, such as Asterisk version or whatever. Thanks, Steve Doug Reid wrote: > Hi Steve > > I have tried a constant ping and get no problem on that. I assume that the > registration would use UPD and ping would

I missed that snmp-ups set pollfreq to 30 by default. I'd hope that it would set deadtime to an appropriate value as well than, no? Is there a way to query what the settings are or what the defaults are? I'm going to set POLLFREQ=30 and DEADTIME = 90 and see if that has any effect. I'll check for the logs. And if that doesn't get my anywhere I'll look at trying to simulate

Today has been the day for satellite questions, apparently, so I'll proxy one out to the rest of the community... I asked this tangentially a month or two ago, but I'll put it in a more blunt way: If you have IAX2 trunking mode experience over satellite, please let us know your experiences with that protocol/transport combination. I've got several people asking about IAX2 and

On Nov 18, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11/18/2015 07:31 AM, Tim Evans wrote: >> Would like to hear recommendations here. > > https://www.ixsystems.com/freenas-mini/ For those who don?t know why you?d pay $1000 for a diskless 4-bay NAS box when there are $300-500 boxes that are superficially similar from QNAP, Synology,

Hi there!!! I'm returned to TINC :D I've got a question: I've setted up a server in a provider's NAT, and all users of this VPN are in the same provider's NAT... Well, I let the main server connect to all users, but... only the first ConnectTo works... in fact I've noticed that if the first user connects to another one, the last can connect to the server, while he

Hi, ist there a way to tell tinc to connect to all available certificates? Something like ConnectTo = hosts/* This would allow to just distribute the certs without changing the .conf file. rm

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:37:24PM +0530, Anil Moris wrote: > I have a use case where my tinc.conf ConnectTo can go upto 20 + hosts. > > I am planning to automate a periodic cleanup of ConnectTo in the tinc.conf > file, the issue is I am not able to figure out which ConnectTo is been used > and which are stale, say NOT used in last 2 to 3 days. > > I want to remove those

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:37:28AM +0530, Anil Moris wrote: > if I use AutoConnect = yes then will it automatically remove connections > that are no longer in use? > What are the security issues with 'AutoConnect = yes' I should be worried? > for my use case I might go upto 20 to 30 + tinc hosts connected to single > tinc box. > as per the doc AutoConnect = yes is

X-up is being called when any connection is being built between node A and node X, it doesn't have anything to do whether you have connectTo in the config file or not. Because tinc is a mesh network, if node A have a direct connection to node B, and node B have a connection to node X, you can have a connection between A and X, and X-up is being called at the moment when it built a connection