similar to: Security issues in tinc

Hello everyone, Last week the CVS version of tinc gained the ability to run under Windows, in a Cygwin environment (http://www.cygwin.com), making use of the virtual network driver from the CIPE project (http://cipe-win32.sourceforge.net/). Preparations were also being made to support Windows without Cygwin. Today James Yonan of OpenVPN (http://openvpn.sourceforge.net/) anounced a port of

Just spotted this on the VTun mailing list. Might be interesting, if there were a TUN/TAP driver for windows it would be a lot easier to make a M$ port of tinc. Not that I feel much motivation to do so... ----- Forwarded message from Michael Heyse <mh@designassembly.de> ----- From: "Michael Heyse" <mh@designassembly.de> To: "VTun mailing list"

There were a few notes in this thread that may indicate open areas for development. I forward merely as FYI. http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-January/024231.html ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz> Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why aren?t we using SSH for everything? To: calestyo at

Damien, What is the best document to use for documentation on SFTP? In other words, if I want to build an SFTP client library based on libssh.a, is there documentation about the series of messages I need to send over the wire? Thanks, ScottN -----Original Message----- From: openssh-unix-dev [mailto:openssh-unix-dev-bounces+scott_n=xypro.com at mindrot.org] On Behalf Of Damien Miller Sent:

Hello everybody, If you're there, and you're interested, you can find us at the time and place mentioned in the subject! See you there. ------------------------------------------- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net> ------------------------------------------- See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/ http://www.kernelbench.org/

I got some email from spsun@public1.wx.js.cn, and he found out that: - The nasty key exchange bug that will make connections go dead after an hour is part of the tinc 1.0pre4 release :(. It will only show up on VPNs with more than 2 daemons though. It is already fixed in the CVS version. - If IndirectData = yes, there is still an error in protocol.c: DEL_HOSTS are sent for hosts which

Hi everybody, I'm looking into replacing the linked lists in tinc with balanced trees. Using balanced trees will greatly improve performance for medium to large VPNs. As I see it, there are several options: 1) Use tsearch()/twalk()/etc functions from glibc. + It is in a very standard library - It relies solely on callback functions, which sometimes results in ugly, awkward code (I

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 03:19:16PM -0500, Steve Horne wrote: > First, please forgive me if the answer to my question is accessible somewhere That's all right. > I want to set up a vpn between a computer with a standard IP address (HOME), > and one hidden behind a firewall, without an externally accessible IP address > (WORK). I can reach HOME from WORK via TCP/IP but not the

On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:57:25AM +0000, cuBe wrote: > Having some probs with setting up tap0: > > aibo:~# ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00 > SIOCSIFHWADDR: No such device > > Now, I;ve checked everthing, and it all seems in order. I have compiled in > theUniversal TAP/TUN support, and Netlink (including CONFIG_NETLINK_DEV), > but to no avil, that error always

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:11:38PM +0100, Ralf Petry wrote: > more or less just a general question: i am running a suse linux 8.1 as > a server and ipcop 1.2 (and at another place ipcop 1.4) as > firewall/router. > i would like to achieve the following: allow a certain company (with > windows server and clients) to connect > to my network via vpn. where would i set up tinc? on

Hello, It's almost time for a new release: 1.0. We would like this release to support all the platforms supported by 1.0pre8: GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, MacOS/X (Darwin) and Solaris (SunOS). Furthermore, we also would like to see tinc ported to the following platforms: GNU/Hurd, Windows (Cygwin/MingW/native) However, all the main developers work mainly with Linux and have little

With much pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0. Here is a summary of the changes: * Lots of small bugfixes and code cleanups. * Throughput doubled and latency reduced. * Added support for LZO compression. * No need to set MAC address or disable ARP anymore. * Added support for Windows 2000 and XP, both natively and in a Cygwin environment. This version is compatible with

With much pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0. Here is a summary of the changes: * Lots of small bugfixes and code cleanups. * Throughput doubled and latency reduced. * Added support for LZO compression. * No need to set MAC address or disable ARP anymore. * Added support for Windows 2000 and XP, both natively and in a Cygwin environment. This version is compatible with

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 11:51:53AM +0100, Marcel Loesberg wrote: > I'm going to build a VPN and I want to use either Tinc or FreeS/WAN. > I've started building the VPN with FreeS/WAN and I find things are getting > rather complicated. > I looks like Tinc is much easier to configure but in the FAQ and in what I've > seen of the documentation so far there is no mention of

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:38:24AM -0400, Michael Adams wrote: > I've tried joining the tinc mailing lists to no avail. I wanted to make the > following posting... You need to subscribe to the mailing list before you can post to it. If you have a problem subscribing, please let me know what went wrong. > Greetings to all from Florida. My name's Mike Adams, and I've been

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 12:07:59AM -0800, Dave Taht wrote: [...] > https://github.com/dtaht/tinc > > I successfully converted tinc to use sendmsg and recvmsg, acquire (at > least on linux) the TTL/Hoplimit and IP_TOS/IPv6_TCLASS packet fields, Windows does not have sendmsg()/recvmsg(), but the BSDs support it. > as well as SO_TIMESTAMPNS, and use a higher resolution internal

Hello everybody, I have just released tinc 1.0pre4. Changes: - New authentication protocol (better security, and faster too). - TCPonly and IndirectData are back (but not fully tested). - Documentation revised, it's really up to date with the released package now. - tincd -K now stores public/private keys in PEM format, but keys of 1.0pre3 can still be used. - Faster and more secure

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 01:42:01AM +0100, Alexander Ypema wrote: > So as probably any Tinc user, I noticed there are two versions: 1.0 and > 1.1. On the website is explained that 1.1 is the stepping stone for 2.0 and > that it has a lot of neat features *planned*. However, in the repositories, > one usually finds version 1.0, and since I'm someone who prefers having >

Dev-Cpp is a IDE that can be used with MinGW and GCC but its causing problems. I installed MinGW since I am used to ./configure type builds but im unsure if this is a tinc issue or OpenSSL issue. I installed openssl 0.9.8e and I get to the following, $./configure ... checking openssl/evp.h usability... yes ... checking for openssl/engine.h... yes checking for SHA1_version in -lcrypto... no

Or polarssl ? www.polarssl.org Static link? On 12/28/2014 11:00 AM, Pedro C?rte-Real wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: >> Although the cryptography is now separated from the rest of the logic in >> tinc, it is not really replaceable, since only OpenSSL is supported. >> However, there is also a new protocol in tinc