similar to: Status of tinc, and release plans for 1.0 and further.

Hi all, I just uploaded tinc 1.0pre1 to the server. I included and rpm, which has been made possible by the work of Lubom?r Bulej and Mads Kiilerich. Please test this version, so that any bugs left can be squished before 1.0 gets final. Also be aware that this version includes a new version of the protocol, and is thus NOT compatible with the protocol that 0.3 uses. Thanks for flying tinc.

Hi all, I just uploaded tinc 1.0pre1 to the server. I included and rpm, which has been made possible by the work of Lubom?r Bulej and Mads Kiilerich. Please test this version, so that any bugs left can be squished before 1.0 gets final. Also be aware that this version includes a new version of the protocol, and is thus NOT compatible with the protocol that 0.3 uses. Thanks for flying tinc.

Hello everyone, Today is exactly 10 years ago that tinc 1.0 was released. I would have hoped to celebrate this by releasing 1.0.22 and 1.1pre8 today, but this will instead happen in one week. Tinc 1.1 is close to becoming stable, and I hope to release 1.1.0 before the end of the year. The main features of tinc 1.1 are the improved security over tinc 1.0, and a much nicer interface that makes it

Hello everyone, Today is exactly 10 years ago that tinc 1.0 was released. I would have hoped to celebrate this by releasing 1.0.22 and 1.1pre8 today, but this will instead happen in one week. Tinc 1.1 is close to becoming stable, and I hope to release 1.1.0 before the end of the year. The main features of tinc 1.1 are the improved security over tinc 1.0, and a much nicer interface that makes it

Quoting Mads Kiilerich <Mads@Kiilerich.com>: > AARGH, > > Ivo, I hope I remember the file this time... ;) Lubomir, thanks for the comments/changes. I'm still busy writing: 1) a debian version of the init script that tries to do the same as the redhat one you and Mads have been working on, and a 2) perl script to create configuration files by asking the user questions. As

THis is the modified script that came with tinc 1.0pre2, and it now uses ifconfig in stead of ip-route. I changed the syntax to be correct (may already have been fixedin a newer version), it now checks whether or not there is a '/dev/tapX' or a '/dev/netlink/tapX' and it checks if there is a module or not. I also added the force_connect and the reload options. Force_connect send

Hello, regarding the debian init.d script, a perl rewrite of the shell script by Lubomir. The debian-specific (?) start-stop-daemon is used. It uses its own pid-file handling instead of the one build into tinc. Bug or feature? "old" ifconfig and route commands are used instead of iproute commands. Bug or feature? regards, -- Mads Kiilerich Sys.Adm. Cand.Polyt

Mads Kiilerich wrote: > Right now at this moment we have reached a level where I have > no further patches! :-) great! :) Guus is now doing a last protocol change, after that is tested, I'm going to make 1.0pre1 official, including an rpm (deb will have to wait due to some difficulties). > I don't think a configuration program will be needed. VPN is not > for

Hello, trying to start tinc I get the following at the client: Apr 17 16:34:50 otto tincd[10238]: tincd 0.3.3 starting, debug level 1. Apr 17 16:34:50 otto tincd[10238]: Generating 128 bits keys. Apr 17 16:34:50 otto tincd[10238]: Ready: listening on port 655. Apr 17 16:34:50 otto tincd[10238]: Connected to xxx Apr 17 16:34:50 otto tincd[10238]: Memory exhausted; exiting. - on a machine with 80

Hello Mads, In case you never saw any mail from me, I'm tinc's co-author. It would be helpful if you'd subscribe to the tinc developpers mailing list. It's not high volume, but it eases communication. There's a problem with tinc's boot scripts (at least the debian one, but that's fixed now). The netmask of the tap devices should be larger than the one specified with

Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn''t find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs [b]392G[/b] 120G 272G 31% /zfs VxFS /dev/vx/dsk/zonedg/zonevol

I updated DwarfDebug to use section offset, instead of hard coding 0, to handle LTO properly. r107202. Thanks for brining this up. - Devang On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote: > DW_AT_stmt_list attribute's value is a section offset to the line no > info for current compilation unit. If there is only one  compilation > unit

> There's still a problem for Darwin, or any other platform that use > subsections-via-symbols type layout tricks, though. There's no assembler- > time way to know how far apart the atoms in the section will be at > runtime, as the linker can, and will, move things around. Hmm, yes that does sound quite tricky. How do we currently deal with that for other pc-relative loads.

And, here''s a fix. -----Original Message----- From: David Zhao <dzhao@LURK.KELLOGG.NWU.EDU> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG <BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG> Date: Sunday, May 17, 1998 3:00 PM Subject: simple kde exploit fix >in kdebase/kscreensaver/kscreensave.cpp: > >change: >line 18: strcpy( buffer, getenv("HOME") ); > to >

Hello, I have a question that I was wondering if anyone had a fairly straightforward answer to: what is the quickest and easiest way to take advantage of the extra cores / processors that are now commonplace on modern machines? And how do I do that in Windows? I realise that this is a complex question that is not answered easily, so let me refine it some more. The type of scripts that I'm

Hi, We have a two node cluster running SLES 9 SP2 connecting directly to an EMC CX300 for storage. We are using OCFS(OCFS2 DLM 0.99.15-SLES) for the voting disk etc, and ASM for data files. The system has been running until last Friday when the whole cluster went down with the following error messages in the /var/log/messages files : rac1: Jul 7 14:56:23 rac1 kernel:

Hello, As more and more libraries are using a Prototype library - multiple versions of it may be loaded in the same project without people even noticing that. For example, we''re developing a JSF application and use Ajax4jsf library. We use a Prototype by ourselves (just upgraded to RC of 1.6) but Ajax4jsf also comes with it''s own Prototype (version 1.5.0). Ajax4jsf folks

Hi Devang, Thanks for working on that. Unfortunately after your change it still doesn't work (I've tried x86 and our backend under Linux). The problem is that you put difference between two labels .Lset7 = .Lsection_line_begin-.Lsection_line ## DW_AT_stmt_list and that will be evaluated by assembler to a constant. It has to be a label, not a constant, because it is the linker who knows

Hi Ivo, --On Freitag, 23. Juni 2000 01:15 +0200 Ivo Timmermans <zarq@icicle.yi.org> wrote: > I'm not sure I fully understand your patch. This is not so important since I'm trying to get 1.0pre2 running. Although I had no luck so far, I'll point out what's going wrong at the end of this mail. > For instance, you force a > key exchange when the connection is made,

Hello Mike, <mikef> hi. I installed tinc.rpm to two servers (both of which are acting as firewalls) <mikef> they can connect to each other successfully according to /var/log/messages, but I can't get traffic to move across it <mikef> anybody have any ideas? It's probably something with wrong settings for Virtual IP's and/or routing. Could you please