similar to: Rebalance failures

I started rebalancing my 25x2 distributed-replicate volume two days ago. Since then, the memory usage of the rebalance processes has been steadily climbing by 1-2 megabytes per minute. Following http://gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/High_Memory_Usage, I tried "echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches". This had no effect on the processes' memory usage. Some of the

I've got a strange situation with musiconhold. It works if I dial my extension 6000: >From extensions.conf: exten => 6000,1,Answer exten => 6000,2,MusicOnHold() Debug output if I call 6000: -- Executing Answer("SIP/gs1-b6ee", "") in new stack -- Executing MusicOnHold("SIP/gs1-b6ee", "") in new stack -- Started music on hold,

On 9/23/2015 2:58 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > 1.) why 'cd /greenstone/gs3 && ant start' when you could just run > '/greenstone/gs3/ant start'. thats *not* equivalent, unless ant is in /greenstone/gs3 *and* . is in the path, and even then, ant looks for build.xml in the current path when its invoked, so the cd /path/to/build/ is appropriate. -- john r

Hi I am trying to get Greenstone3 http://www.greenstone.org/download to work with systemd. So far I have come up with the following which works but feels more like a hack than a solution. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to do this better ? # cat /etc/tmpfiles.d/greenstone3.conf d /run/greenstone3 0755 gs3 gs3 - # cat /etc/systemd/system/greenstone3.service # Systemd unit file for

On 24.09.2015 00:06, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/23/2015 2:58 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> 1.) why 'cd /greenstone/gs3 && ant start' when you could just run >> '/greenstone/gs3/ant start'. > > thats *not* equivalent, unless ant is in /greenstone/gs3 *and* . is in > the path, and even then, ant looks for build.xml in the current path > when

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +1200, Clint Dilks wrote: > # cat /etc/systemd/system/greenstone3.service > # Systemd unit file for Greenstone 3 > [Unit] > Description=Greenstone 3 Server > After=syslog.target network.target > > [Service] > Type=forking > PIDFile=/run/greenstone3/greenstone3.pid >

Hi, On 23 April 2018 at 18:52, Frank Ruehlemann <ruehlemann at itsc.uni-luebeck.de> wrote: > Hi, > > after 2 years running GlusterFS without bigger problems we're facing > some strange errors lately. > > After updating to 3.12.7 some user reported at least 4 broken > directories with some invisible files. The files are at the bricks and > don't start with a

Hi, What is the output of 'gluster volume info' for this volume? Regards, Nithya On 23 April 2018 at 18:52, Frank Ruehlemann <ruehlemann at itsc.uni-luebeck.de> wrote: > Hi, > > after 2 years running GlusterFS without bigger problems we're facing > some strange errors lately. > > After updating to 3.12.7 some user reported at least 4 broken > directories

Replying and adding gluster-users. That seems more appropriate? ________________________________________ From: gluster-devel-bounces+jwalker=gluster.com at nongnu.org [gluster-devel-bounces+jwalker=gluster.com at nongnu.org] on behalf of Emmanuel Dreyfus [manu at netbsd.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 6:51 AM To: gluster-devel at nongnu.org Subject: [Gluster-devel] volume rebalance still broken

Hello all, I had gluster volume distributed over 7 machines with a single brick each. After adding two more bricks I started the rebalance command, but the memory usage of the glusterfs process handling this ate up all the available memory on the machine I started the rebalance on. I tried again on another peer with more memory and here it also ate up 60 GB and showed no sign of getting

Hi, I ran the gluster volume rebalance command after add more bricks to the exist volume. The existing data is about 3T. However, the rebalance failed after running for a day, while still in "fix layout" stage, and it continue to fail a few times after I manually start rebalance again..... Do you have any idea how to fix that? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi Guys, I have a rebalance that is going so slow it may never end. Particulars on system: 3 nodes 6 bricks, ~55TB about 10%full. The use of data is very active during the day and less so at night. All are CentOS 6.3, x86_64, Gluster 3.2.6 [root at node01 ~]# gluster volume rebalance data01 status rebalance step 2: data migration in progress: rebalanced 1378203 files of size 308570266988

Filesystem rebalancing (BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE) affects the entire filesystem and may run uninterruptibly for a long time. This does not seem to be something that an unprivileged user should be able to do. Reported-by: Aron Xu <happyaron.xu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Hello, The past couple of weeks I had some issues with firmware on the OS hard drives in my gluster cluster. I have recently fixed the issue, and am bringing my bricks back into the volume. I am running gluster 3.7.6 and am running into the following issue: When I add the brick and rebalance, the operation fails after a couple minutes. The errors I find in the rebalance log is this: [2017-06-05

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tahereh Fattahi" <t28.fattahi at gmail.com> > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 12:21:53 AM > Subject: [Gluster-users] Rebalance without changing layout > > Hi > Is it possible to rebalance data in gluster without changing layout? > When I use rebalance with force, the layout changed. I dont

Hi, We had a BOF on Rebalance at the Gluster Summit to get feedback from Gluster users. - Performance has improved over the last few releases and it works well for large files. - However, it is still not fast enough on volumes which contain a lot of directories and small files. The bottleneck appears to be the single-threaded filesystem crawl. - Scripts using the fix-layout and file migration

Hello, We are running glusterfs 6.6 on Ubuntu. We have a Gluster storage system that is a few years old. There are 4 VMs running a Dispersed (NOT replicated) system - a 3 + 1 configuration. Generally performance is well tuned for our needs, but the problem arose last time we added bricks: we attempted a rebalance which is reported as failed. From the mounted POSIX view of the file system, we

Hi Is it possible to rebalance data in gluster without changing layout? When I use rebalance with force, the layout changed. I dont want changing layout, just balancing data over layout. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170518/f545fec3/attachment.html>

Hi all, I'm using glusterfs for a few years now, and generally very happy with it. Saved my data multiple times already! :-) However, I do have a few questions for which I hope someone is able to answer them. I have a distributed, replicated glusterfs setup. I am in the process of replacing 4TB bricks with 8TB bricks, which is working nicely. However, what I am seeing now is that the space

I met a big problem,the cluster rebalance takes a long time after adding a new node gluster volume rebalance web status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------