similar to: Excellent 6.3 QA Status Updates

In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been released to QA: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/

Greetings- Is there any updated news on the CentOS6 front? As per qaweb [1], today should be the day of QA signoff and syncing to internal mirrors. Are things still on track? --Tim [1] http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa

Posted, in case you haven't seen it already: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/116 Good news.

The QA web site at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog was really helpful for those of us who were curious as to how CentOS 6.0 was coming along. However, there doesn't seem to be much information as to how CentOS 6.1 is going from either the QA web site, the forums (Announcements), or Kananbir's twitter feed -- but it may be I'm just not looking in the right place. Does the QA

Hi gang - Just took a look at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar/ I dont see anything on there for 6.1 Not trying to start flames and I know its ready when its ready and all that - but I was just surprised to see "nothing" on the calendar. jerry

I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the information given on this site: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/calendar -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax:

For those who don't follow the QA RSS, see: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/120 to get the latest info on the status of 6.2. Looks good so far!

Does anybody know why this list is private and password protected? It would be nice to see progress, but it appears that part of the development is completely locked down and not open source. -- Steven Crothers steven.crothers at gmail.com

Hello guys, we have done some progress on the new web site project. We need your comments for the design of the front page. We have 3 proposals or the design of the frontpage. Please look at them, we need your help :) http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/websitever2/ Best regards, Marian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

Hi devs, If/when someone has a few minutes, could someone post an update on 6.1 on http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog ?. I suspect the devs have been busy with the just-released 5.7 version. :) -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "At what point did we

Thanks for the breakdown Paul - I've had to learn all my sysadmin stuff through organic interactions like this. Still though - someone manages the default repositories - so my question is, who decides when a package gets an update from whatever CentOS ships with default to a newer version? How does that process take place, and, can I affect it by adding microcode_ctl-2.1-18 ? On Wed, Jan 4,

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, david wrote: > > > > At 09:09 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote: >> >> > FOLLOWUP & REPORT >> > >> > I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try OpenVPN. I >> > already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was easy. The HOW-TO >> > guides were less

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 13:45, Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, cliff here wrote: > > > You should check the perms on the dirs, ssh will not allow it use > > the keys if they are too permissive. So I would check starting at > > /home > > This is the most likely cause; I'd check there too. > > If not, > > 1.

Thanks Mark and Christian, I have two Samba servers running those two versions. That reassure me! Thanks, Bernard On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does a fix has already been

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:02 PM Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2020, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am user of CentOS 8. > > When can we expect an image on AWS? > > I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that. > > I can't speak to AWS per se, but Digital Ocean has a CentOS 8

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: >> >> > Hello all, >> > >> > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for >> > up-to-date information on this matter, and have found >> > information that is anywhere from 15 to 5

Our new-to-us Isilon is handling NFSv4 ACLs differently than other NFS file servers we've had. In particular, something causes an 'O' to pop up in the permission field, but I cannot find any documentation of it. For example, [Linux]$ nfs4_getfacl TODO A::OWNER@:tTcCy A::GROUP@:tcy A::EVERYONE@:rwaxtTnNcy A:O:OWNER@:rwadxtTnNcCoy A:gO:admins at madboa.com:rwadxtTnNcy A:gO:readonly

On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 16:43, Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > I might actually be able to have a workable answer: > > > > alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs' > > /usr/bin/df \ > -x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \ > -x devpts -x devtmpfs -x efivarfs

On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > > information on this matter, and have found information that is > anywhere from > > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more > up to

There is a slight performance related reason for exporting disk partitions individually, the performance boost is server-side as Paul says. The advantage is that the no_subtree_check can be used without any additional security risk. It is probably the case that the /export/base/a is a partition, is exported with no_subtree_check, and therefore there is a small performance boost. Preventing