similar to: CentOS 6 bridging problem.

Hello What I''m looking for is how to configure the Linux QoS module to do global rate limitation for two (or more) 802.1q pseudo network devices. I naturally suppose there is a possibility with IFB. I don''t want to use IMQ because it''s not integrated to my kernel v2.6.21.1 and I didn''t find IMQ patches for it nor for the iptables package I use (v1.3.7).

I''m working on setting up a new router/server/etc. box. I''m using Proxmox as the base system (Debian Lenny basically). I''m trying to figure out the right way to configure Shorewall on it. I''ve looked at some of the bridging info but they seem to all be talking about single-interface setups. Could someone look over my setup and give me some input into the

Hi, I have two public ip''s and i want to dedicate one ip for incoming and outgoing to one server. I followed http://www.shorewall.net/shorewall_setup_guide.htm and used the example of the daughter system. I have a machine connected on vmbr0 with address 10.10.10.1 listening on port 80 www. Still I can''t connect to this system. I''m forgetting something? Sincerely,

I have this rule in place: -------------------------------------- DNAT net dmz:10.0.0.7 tcp 80,443 - 94.23.242.44 -------------------------------------- When I change this policy: -------------------------------------- net dmz DROP -------------------------------------- to: -------------------------------------- net dmz DROP info

When I use my kickstart file (which works on 5.1 x86_64) with 5.2 I get the following error. I put my kickstart file at the end. Do I have something incomaptible in the file? jerry -------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call first): File "/usr/lib/anaconda/network.py", line 341, in lookupHostname ret = isys.pumpNetDevice(dev.get('device'),

Hi all, I have a question about a multi-homed Samba file server and interoperability with AD. It's a bit complicated, so please bear with me. I've been running Samba 4.11.6 as an AD server (two DCs) for a while (in RFC2307 mode) in a mixed Windows/Linux environment. I have a server running Proxmox (Debian) with Samba 4.9.5 and it is sharing my huge ZFS volume via Samba to Windows

1. Link state monitoring added. We discovered the following problem with the existing bridge code. The code doesn't monitor the link state of the interfaces. When using two cisco switches with two Linux bridging firewalls the following problem exists. When the Cisco switch that has the blocking (stp) Linux bridge attached dies, the Linux bridge no longer receives stp packets and changes

Hello, When I use a standard Redhat kernel, it's ok. Everything's working right. That the Linux bridge configuration does not work afer I upgraded the kernel to 2.6.33.2. Why? [root at node78 ~]# cat /etc/issue Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga) Kernel \r on an \m [root at node78 ~]# uname -a Linux node78 2.6.33.2 #1 SMP Wed Apr 14 10:10:29 CST 2010 x86_64

I can’t seem to find info about layer 2 tinc tap interface bridge with local physical nic. I have successfully created two nodes configuration with tinc acting as switch. My problem is ethernet packets only flow between two nodes and not to hosts on bridged nic. Example: Server 1 - eth0 bridged with tinc tap device, then bridge gets IP via dhcp server on physical nic subnet. Server 2 - local

Hi, I am trying to get my kickstart file that worked under 5.1 to work under 5.2 centos x86_64. This is the error that I get. On the screen it says Exception occured and gives me the option to save it. This is that file. I dont see any odd that would cause it to crash. Can anyone help. My kickstart file is in the mix below. Seems to be related to network, my line seems fine (I think) for

hello before asking my question I come My name is Santiago and I''m from Spain but I''m in Colombia I followed this guide: https://www.doas.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html but when I run shorewall check, this error occurs: Checking... Initializing... Determining Zones... IPv4 Zones: net loc Firewall Zone: fw Validating interfaces file... ERROR: Invalid

I have struggled for a week trying to get domain users to map and/or browse Samba shares without entering a password. If I login to the domain with a WinXP client and try to map or browse a Samba share, I get prompted for user/pass. If I then login with a local machine account (same user/pass) it works. This same configuration also works just fine on W2K clients logged into the domain. I am

Hi, I'm trying to create a snapshot from a KVM VM: # virsh snapshot-create one-5 error: unsupported configuration: internal checkpoints require at least one disk to be selected for snapshot How can I debug this error message and what does it mean? Some system information: * Ubuntu 13.04 64Bit * virsh --version: 1.0.2 * The XML of the VM is below Thanks for all help... Cheers, Tobias

I''ve been using Puppet now for a month or so and I''ve come to a problem that may warrant an additional Puppet metaparameter. I''m advocating the addition of a metaparameter called "preaction" (or something like that), which will perform some arbitrary action before the resource is modified. There may be a way to do this within Puppet already (with some

I have had an IP Address Record of the name Z37 which was 192.168.2.203. Using nslookup I find it, but samba-tool queries the name and shows 0 Records? $ nslookup Z37 Server: 192.168.2.1 Address: 192.168.2.1#53 Name: Z37.calcdom.local Address: 192.168.2.203 $ samba-tool dns query localhost calcdom.local @ ALL Name=, Records=4, Children=0 SOA: serial=119, refresh=900,

Hi all. We currently want to deploy a test private IaaS. It will look something like below: 2 Gb switches several hardware nodes for virtualization (?) 2 10Gb switches redundant storage (?) What are you proposing to use on every level? Eucalyptus/OpenStack/something else for cloud management? And why? KVM/Xen/something else for virtualization? iSCSI/NFS/something else for storage? Please

Hi everybody. I''m trying to configure shorewall folowing this manual: http://www.montanalinux.org/proxmox-ve-with-shorewall.html But with shorewall check it tells me thah: Checking /etc/shorewall/interfaces... ERROR: Unknown zone (dmz) : /etc/shorewall/interfaces (line 16) How can I define it in the zone file? thanks for the help. best regards, Santiago.

I upgraded my office installation from 13.10 to 13.11 yesterday and now I am having problems registering phones. Here is what I get on the CLI: [Sep 2 15:38:46] WARNING[2098]: res_config_mysql.c:1162 require_mysql: Realtime table general at ps_contacts: column 'qualify_timeout' cannot be type 'int(10)' (need char) [Sep 2 15:38:46] WARNING[2098]: res_config_mysql.c:1162

I have a linux server with 3 public IPs, and I use SSH tunnelling to connect to each of them. Let's call them: 1.1.1.1 (venet0:0), 1.1.1.2 (venet0:1), 1.1.1.3 (venet0:2). When I tunnel using 1.1.1.1, outgoing IP for the public is: 1.1.1.1. But when I tunnel using 1.1.1.2 or 1.1.1.3, the outgoing IP for the public is still 1.1.1.1. I've been googling for days, and tried relevant channels

Beta 3 is now available for testing. http://www.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4/shorewall-4.4.0-Beta3 ftp://ftp.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/development/4.4/shorewall-4.4.0-Beta3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N 4 . 4 . 0 Beta 3