similar to: [Bug 633] New: No chain/target/match by that name

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631 Summary: Unable to zero packet and byte count for policy. Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

hi, i try use iptables connlimit, # iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 where is problem ? thanks # rpm -qa | grep iptables iptables-1.3.5-4.el5 # uname -a Linux test 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:04:27 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=515 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-21 19:33 MET ------- Please try the current snapshot from ftp.netfilter.org. Its going to be released as 1.3.6 very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618 Summary: connlimit doesn't work after upgrade to iptables 1.4.5 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610 Summary: conntrack doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: urykhy at

Greetings folks, I've been researching the various iptables modules that are included with the stock CentOS4 distro; particularly the connlimit module. Is connlimit included by default? I thought it is since performing # iptables -m connlimit --help returns information on connlimit usage along with the general iptables help info: <SNIP> connlimit v1.2.11 options: [!]

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467 mateusz@kaduk.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From mateusz@kaduk.net 2006-10-01

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-18

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Summary: Snapshot does not contain any file Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All URL: http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=408 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-25 14:58 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=201) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=201&action=view) patch Fixed by this patch, thanks for the report. -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=559 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-04-11 21:02 MET ------- Looks like 32/64 bit issues. Bugzilla

Would someone please explain to me the difference in effect between the following two IPTABLES conditions and the significance thereof in concurrent connection limiting? --tcp-flags SYN,ACK,FIN,RST SYN -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 --state NEW -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-04-28 08:25 ------- The misnomer is true. I

i''m running SW v4.5.14 i''ve created a basic /rules set, referencing a single action: cat /etc/shorewall/rules ############################################################################################################################################### #ACTION SOURCE DEST PROTO DEST SOURCE ORIGINAL RATE USER/ MARK CONNLIMIT TIME HEADERS

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=481 ------- Additional Comments From joseba.beltran@gmail.com 2006-05-31 19:09 MET ------- Many pptp nat helper users are suffering this problem: http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4118&highlight=pptp http://www.chillispot.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=958&highlight=pptp

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=527 ------- Additional Comments From vapier@gentoo.org 2006-12-30 05:34 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=280) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=280&action=view) iptables-more-exact-check-grep.patch this tweaks the grep: egrep -e '(^|[[:space:]])(-g|-pg|-DIPTC_DEBUG)([[:space:]]|$)'

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857 Summary: ConnLimit unable to work properly Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

I had problems with 2.6.19 kernel, appears to be some "binaries" problems about iptables and kernel modules, then I pass to try the 2.6.18.3 kernel to tests some things. When I put -j ROUTE into -t mangle table and PREROUTING chain, I have no problems, but when I try -j ROUTE into POSTROUTING chain, my system loss all network access (and it is posible it crash, I''m not there to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463 Bug ID: 1463 Summary: nft --json table list ruleset crashes Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=472 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-04-21