similar to: [Bug 618] New: connlimit doesn't work after upgrade to iptables 1.4.5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=515 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-21 19:33 MET ------- Please try the current snapshot from ftp.netfilter.org. Its going to be released as 1.3.6 very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the

Greetings folks, I've been researching the various iptables modules that are included with the stock CentOS4 distro; particularly the connlimit module. Is connlimit included by default? I thought it is since performing # iptables -m connlimit --help returns information on connlimit usage along with the general iptables help info: <SNIP> connlimit v1.2.11 options: [!]

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610 Summary: conntrack doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: urykhy at

hi, i try use iptables connlimit, # iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 where is problem ? thanks # rpm -qa | grep iptables iptables-1.3.5-4.el5 # uname -a Linux test 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:04:27 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=515 Summary: connlimit filter doesn't work in 1.3.5 version of iptables Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libiptc AssignedTo:

Hi, to the use of connlimit, I have found http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-June/059656.html Is there something new with centos 5.3 or 5.4? Helmut -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091223/803acd8e/attachment.html>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857 Summary: ConnLimit unable to work properly Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1207 Bug ID: 1207 Summary: connlimit rule fires too often Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) Assignee:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633 Summary: No chain/target/match by that name Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597 Summary: ip6tables connlimit - cannot set CIDR greater than 32 (includes fix) Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: ip6tables AssignedTo: laforge

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

Hi all, I've analyzed the packet stream resulting from a SIP session through Asterisk, and I found that Asterisk sends a lot of useless messages! In example, it repeats the three way handshake (invite-ok-ack) every time, also when it has just to forward the 'bye' message. Has anyone found the same srange thing? thanks..

Hi everyone, I see that shorewall has "ratelimit" but i''m interested in deny conexions by number of them, not by number/sec. Is connlimit feature supported by shorewall? Or maybe someone have an extraofficial patch for them? Regards, Angel Mieres ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

hallo the patch described at http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-3.html#ss3.5 works for the FORWARD chain as well ? thanks, petre -- Petre Bandac Network Scientist - petre@kgb.ro _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Would someone please explain to me the difference in effect between the following two IPTABLES conditions and the significance thereof in concurrent connection limiting? --tcp-flags SYN,ACK,FIN,RST SYN -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 --state NEW -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Summary: Incorrection in connlimit's man page Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi- bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/iptables/extensions/libipt_connlim it.man?rev=3816&view=markup

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467 mateusz@kaduk.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From mateusz@kaduk.net 2006-10-01

Hi all, I noticed on the web site that Wine 0.9.55 has been released on February, 8th, but still I don't see the update on Adept Manager. I'm using Kubuntu 7.10 64 Bits and I added the Wine's official repository on the Adept repository list. Is it just me or there is a problem on the Wine repository? Thank in advance. -- Marco Di Fresco

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Summary: Snapshot does not contain any file Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All URL: http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=408 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-25 14:58 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=201) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=201&action=view) patch Fixed by this patch, thanks for the report. -- Configure bugmail: