similar to: [Bug 597] New: ip6tables connlimit - cannot set CIDR greater than 32 (includes fix)

Greetings folks, I've been researching the various iptables modules that are included with the stock CentOS4 distro; particularly the connlimit module. Is connlimit included by default? I thought it is since performing # iptables -m connlimit --help returns information on connlimit usage along with the general iptables help info: <SNIP> connlimit v1.2.11 options: [!]

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=857 Summary: ConnLimit unable to work properly Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

hi, i try use iptables connlimit, # iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m connlimit --connlimit-above 16 --connlimit-mask 24 -j DROP iptables: Unknown error 4294967295 where is problem ? thanks # rpm -qa | grep iptables iptables-1.3.5-4.el5 # uname -a Linux test 2.6.18-92.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Sat Jun 21 19:04:27 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=515 Summary: connlimit filter doesn't work in 1.3.5 version of iptables Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libiptc AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1207 Bug ID: 1207 Summary: connlimit rule fires too often Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ip_tables (kernel) Assignee:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618 Summary: connlimit doesn't work after upgrade to iptables 1.4.5 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution|

Hi everyone, I see that shorewall has "ratelimit" but i''m interested in deny conexions by number of them, not by number/sec. Is connlimit feature supported by shorewall? Or maybe someone have an extraofficial patch for them? Regards, Angel Mieres ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

Hi, to the use of connlimit, I have found http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-June/059656.html Is there something new with centos 5.3 or 5.4? Helmut -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091223/803acd8e/attachment.html>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=475 Summary: Incorrection in connlimit's man page Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi- bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/iptables/extensions/libipt_connlim it.man?rev=3816&view=markup

hallo the patch described at http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-3.html#ss3.5 works for the FORWARD chain as well ? thanks, petre -- Petre Bandac Network Scientist - petre@kgb.ro _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=515 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-21 19:33 MET ------- Please try the current snapshot from ftp.netfilter.org. Its going to be released as 1.3.6 very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the

# iptables -m connlimit --help ......... connlimit v1.3.5 options: [!] --connlimit-above n match if the number of existing tcp connections is (not) above n --connlimit-mask n group hosts using mask ----------------------------------------- The library seems to exist also: /lib64/iptables/libipt_connlimit.so However, creating a rule that uses connlimit fails: #$IPTABLES -A

Would someone please explain to me the difference in effect between the following two IPTABLES conditions and the significance thereof in concurrent connection limiting? --tcp-flags SYN,ACK,FIN,RST SYN -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 --state NEW -j REJECT \ --connlimit-above 3 --connlimit-mask 32 -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do

I had problems with 2.6.19 kernel, appears to be some "binaries" problems about iptables and kernel modules, then I pass to try the 2.6.18.3 kernel to tests some things. When I put -j ROUTE into -t mangle table and PREROUTING chain, I have no problems, but when I try -j ROUTE into POSTROUTING chain, my system loss all network access (and it is posible it crash, I''m not there to

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467 mateusz@kaduk.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From mateusz@kaduk.net 2006-10-01

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633 Summary: No chain/target/match by that name Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Hello! I''ve read a lot of mail archives, but can''t find solutions for my problem. I have router with about 700 users. I''m using HTB with SFQ leaf qdiscs for every user (client ip). So, different IP can have its own rate limit. This scheme ir working fine for a long time. But how can I limit number of connections (sessions) from one host? I see from ip_conntrack

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610 Summary: conntrack doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: urykhy at

Hello, I forgot to put my #/etc/shorewall/policy file: # /etc/shorewall/policy ############################################################################### #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LIMIT: CONNLIMIT: # LEVEL BURST MASK # adm net DROP info tlm net DROP info # net adm DROP