similar to: [Bug 557] New: Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[Bug 557] New: Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl"

2007 Apr 18
1
[Bug 557] Makefile doesn't need to link agains libnsl
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Version|CVS (please indicate |1.1.2 -------
2003 Mar 04
2
[Bug 57] Default extensions Makefile breaks with NO_SHARED_LIBS and DO_IPV6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From
2005 Jan 25
0
ACLs agains :(
Hello, I am running Slackware 9.1. Kernel: linux-2.4.22 Samba 3.0.10 with acl Kernel supports ACL with XFS. My problem: On Windows XP e can't see the entire directory ACL. I can only see POSIX ACL(owner+group+world) And I cant modify any ACL from windows. Always get access denied. On Linux side everything works great(getfacl, setfacl, etc). How can I see the entire ACL list
2014 Apr 08
2
OpenSSL Heartbeat exploit agains KVM guest systems
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl, is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost itself? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James
2014 Apr 08
2
OpenSSL Heartbeat exploit agains KVM guest systems
Is it possible to use this exploit against a kvm guest to read memory used by the host? In other words: if an exploitable service, say httpd with mod_ssl, is running in guest system 'vm1' hosted on system 'virthost' then what implications does that have with respect to guests vm2 and vm3 and to virthost itself? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James
2007 Sep 01
4
OT: 4 dual cores agains 2 quad cores
Hi people, Do you have pointers to web documents that help me make comparisons between buying a server with two quad core 2.33 ghz or buying a 4 dual core 2ghz server? I am trying to answer a question of performance. It is not important the redundancy/failover or the price of the server. Just the performance. obviously all the hardware specs are the same, the question is the CPU. --
2000 Apr 11
2
LDFLAGS of the Makefile
I have compiled and installed OpenSSH 1.2.3 under AIX 4.3.3. The call to configure was: CFLAGS="-I/client/include -L/usr/ruf/lib" \ ./configure --with-egd-pool=/dev/urandom \ --with-afs=/usr/afsws \ --with-kerberos4=/client \ --with-tcp-wrappers \ --with-pid-dir=/etc \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --with-ipv4-default \
2007 Feb 10
0
[Bug 543] New: ANY shows as 0 for proto on 1.3.7
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=543 Summary: ANY shows as 0 for proto on 1.3.7 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2003 Feb 27
0
[Bug 57] New: Default extensions Makefile breaks with NO_SHARED_LIBS and DO_IPV6
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57 Summary: Default extensions Makefile breaks with NO_SHARED_LIBS and DO_IPV6 Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: iptables
2006 Oct 31
0
6362982 namespace pollution/protection in libc
Author: raf Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4e0d2d9869b6e03153797c60bb3786268667c14c Log message: 6362982 namespace pollution/protection in libc 6369040 there should be but one synonyms.h file outside of libc Files: create: deleted_files/usr/src/lib/common/inc/mtlib.h create: deleted_files/usr/src/lib/libc/sparcv9/gen/llabs.s create:
2006 Dec 30
0
[Bug 527] New: the check make target has a greedy debug grep
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Summary: the check make target has a greedy debug grep Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2007 Mar 04
0
[Bug 552] New: Strange DNAT behaviour... packet don't pass to PREROUTING and go directly in INPUT !!
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=552 Summary: Strange DNAT behaviour... packet don't pass to PREROUTING and go directly in INPUT !! Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2
2007 May 01
0
[Bug 564] New: quota match: working or not?
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=564 Summary: quota match: working or not? Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
2002 Feb 27
0
[ANNOUNCE] Security Advisory about IRC DCC connection tracking
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! It is my duty to inform you about this very unfortunate security issue in the IRC DCC connection tracking code. The following mail has just been sent to bugtraq, Linux Vendors have been informed two weeks in advance in order to prepare their advisories.
2015 Jun 23
1
is it safe to have two backed used for the same user?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Steffen Kaiser wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, lejeczek wrote: > >> I wonder if it is safe (and wise) to have two passw-user databases for the >> same one user. >> I'm thinking, >> mail to me via pam >> mail to me at this.domain via ldap > > the first passdb wins. No problem. >
2006 Feb 09
1
[Bug 445] ipt_account reports: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2063
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account
2016 Oct 05
3
Failure gpupdate
Yes, I performed tests on both DC's. 2 DC's working normally. The sysvolreset works in both DC's after I disabled full_audit. The gpupdate / force works perfectly. And also through the RSAT, I do not get more permission error when I edit any GPO. If this is a bug, who can inform / report? What I find strange in DC's, is when I view the sysvol permissions. The DC2 appears the
2006 Dec 21
1
Problems with xen: what do you need in the bug report
Hi everybody, I have some issues with the xen package as distributed in etch. I have tried posting on the xensource lists as well as debian-user without any success. So before filling a bug report, I would like to know what exactly do you need in the bug report. The problem: I am using etch on a dual athlon 4G of ram. I am trying to setup dom0 and domu with the package xen-3.0.3 and the right
2004 May 24
0
[Bug 748] HP-UX 11.11 (aka 11i) needs BROKEN_GETADDRINFO
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748 ------- Additional Comments From baby_p_nut at yahoo.com 2004-05-25 09:20 ------- Patch Name: PHNE_27796 Patch Description: s700_800 11.11 libnss_dns DNS backend patch Creation Date: 02/11/26 Post Date: 03/01/07 Hardware Platforms - OS Releases: s700: 11.11 s800: 11.11 Products: N/A Filesets:
2004 Apr 01
3
[Bug 830] Check immediate EOF coming on stdin
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=830 Summary: Check immediate EOF coming on stdin Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: ignasi.roca at