similar to: [Bug 522] SIP helper(?) mangles packets even when inactive

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=522 Summary: SIP helper(?) mangles packets even when inactive Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

I have a RedHat 6.0 x86 server which is serving a number of minor things, which I wish to add shell access to. I'm currently running sshd and am quite happy with it, the exceptiong being that I am unable to make sshd perform a chroot for shell account users. I have been reading man pages and howto's, many of which discuss sshd or chroot, but never the two together. Is this not an

Hi, I''m running into something weird here. I''m using RH5.1 with tcp_wrappers 7.6. The syntax for hosts.allow and hosts.deny is: <service list> : <access list> [ : <shell_command> ] Everything works when I _don''t_ use the shell_command. I used the _exact_ line as in the man-pages utilising "safe_finger" (comes with tcp_wrappers), tcpdchk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ##### ## ## ###### ## ### ## ## ##### ## # ## ## ## ## ### ## ##### . ## ## . ###### . Secure Networks Inc. Security Advisory

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-02-25 22:58 MET ------- > When ip_conntrack_pptp / ip_nat_pptp modules are loaded in addition to ftp ones, the oops happens in one of the latter two modules. I'm not sure I understand. ip_conntrack shouldn't be unloadable while these modules are still loaded, so how

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=517 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-09-26 03:44 MET ------- *** Bug 519 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From dg@ezcom.de 2003-06-30 16:17 ------- today i replaced my 8139too with a 3c59x and the corruptions are gone ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=498 cfilin@intermedia.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chip@innovates.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are

Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() family of modifiers to handle broken userspace Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, and sway 1.5 Signed-off-by: James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 26

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:57:57AM -0700, James Jones wrote: > Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK() > family of modifiers to handle broken userspace > Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. > > Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver, > weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc, > gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04, > and sway 1.5 > >

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=538 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-26

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 mschwendt@users.sf.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From mschwendt@users.sf.net

> Bug ID: 6398177 > Synopsis: zfs: poor nightly build performance in 32-bit mode (high disk activity) Part of the problem appear to be these kmem_caches: # mdb -k ... > ::kmastat cache buf buf buf memory alloc alloc name size in use total in use succeed fail ------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ---------

Dear all, I have a data frame whose name is m1. I want to write this data frame in text file as output.I am using this code- write.table(m1, file = "kas.txt", append = FALSE,row.names=F,quote=F,sep="\t") When I am opening my kas.txt file,the column names are not coming exactly above the column. What should I do.Please help me. Thanking you, Warm Regards Vikas Bansal Msc

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-05-14 02:39 ------- I've captured some non-fragmented tcp packets which show this behaviour with 2.4.21-rc2. They look badly damaged. The destination ip doesn't match the mac but they come from valid connections. Setting interface mtu to 1486 helps which makes me

Hi, my ip_conntrack table is filling up and now my server is dropping packets. I'm running CentOS release 4.4 (Final) on a fairly busy webserver. The table is full of various connections, including a lot of "ESTABLISHED" tcp connections from my webserver (the src is my webserver ip), and some other random connections to my webserver, and many "ASSURED" connections. So why

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=511 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-15 06:42 MET ------- So you're saying the problem is that the receiver updates its window multiple times without receiving any data in between, thereby falsely triggering the "dead-peer detection" (as you call it)? -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:14 ------- did you load iptable_nat at the time the problem with wrong-destip does happen? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Hey guys, I have several Linux routers in place at high-usage locations (student apartment complexes). I''m having trouble with some of the routers which use 6Mbit DSL lines as their Internet feed. The routers use PPPoE and perform NAT. During peak usage periods, the routers are dropping alot of packets. I''m lead to believe this is because there are too many active

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=404 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-03-12