similar to: [Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 Summary: tunnel0 and br0 Product: iptables Version: 1.2.11 Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: tom@tomdeb.org I have a ipsec

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-06-28 02:57 MET ------- Tom - did

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:05:59 +0000 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 08:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It's not really an oops, just a warning that stack space got quiet > > tight. > > > > The problem seems to be that the br netfilter code is nesting far too > > deeply and recursing several times. Looks like a design

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE

Hi, I found this block of code in br_dev_queue_xmit() @ br_forward.c, after applying 'netfilter' patch for 2.4.21 kernel Can someone explain what this block of code is doin? #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER if (skb->nf_bridge) memcpy(skb->data - 16, skb->nf_bridge->hh, 16); #endif 1. What is 16 bytes here...? Ethernet hdr is just 14 bytes 2. Why the ethernet

Hi, I've some problems with this network : [ host1 eth0: 10.22.2.4/8 ] [ host2 eth0:10.22.2.5/8 default route host3] \ / SWITCH internet | | |

Hi, I have 2 servers which are connected to a gateway machine. The gateway and one server are running Linux 2.6.16.2, while the third machine is running 2.6.16.5. The two ethernet ports on the gateway which are connected to the servers are combined into a single ethernet bridge device. Ever since 2.6.16, I have noticed that I can no longer cross-mount the two servers' /home directories via

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hi all, I have a strange problem with GPL PV 0.8.8 (0.6.4 did work). On my 2nd vif I cannot establish TCP connections. The 3rd IP packet (ACK from XEN-Image) is not forwarded by XEN/DOM0-Bridge. If I boot Windows without /GPLPV option, everything works fine. I did some investigation and found out that the packages arrive differently if GPLPV is enabled. "br_inet" is a bridge

Hi, I have a few questions about the inner workings of netfilter (a graphical layout of my network setup @ https://aequorin.homeunix.net:62389/local/media/network-graph.png) 1) These are the syslog entries for some simple connection tests. Shorewall/netfilter has been set to record all stateful connections SSH is recognized as phys(eth0) -> $FW traffic. This is because PHYSIN is

Dear All, I try to upgrade, my old shorewall from 4.4.13-3 to 4.5.2.3-1 on CentOS, after upgrade i can''t start shorewall with this message: "/Shorewall: Address Ranges require the Multiple Match capability in your kernel and iptables/" I try to search on the net about this, but no still no light. Somebody can help me? Great appreciate for any help. Regards,

The bridging documentation (http://shorewall.net/2.0/bridge.html) has been expanded and there is a refresh of the bridging code (ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging and http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Bridging). -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hello, I have started playing around with docker (https://www.docker.io/) and am having trouble to integrate the "docker0" bridge it creates on the fly into my shorewall setup (version 4.5.16.1) on debian testing. IP forwarding is on and I have defined a "doc" ipv4 zone and the interfaces has an entry like so, > doc docker0

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=511 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-15 06:42 MET ------- So you're saying the problem is that the receiver updates its window multiple times without receiving any data in between, thereby falsely triggering the "dead-peer detection" (as you call it)? -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=460 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

Hi all, Does anyone know, if it's possible to reroute all (i.e. HTTP / FTP / DNS / SMTP / POP3 / IMAP / etc) from an ADSL connected machine via another server, which is currently hosted with IS and has full internet access? i.e. Can I setup another machine, on a different public IP than the dynamic ADSL IP as default gw? OR do I need todo something on that machine to work as a router for

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=531 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |kaber@trash.net ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-01-11 19:00 MET ------- Very nice catch. I guess it

Hi Vene, Would appreciate any help you can give as I am not sure which NAT you are talking about. A little more background. I am replacing a Windows 2000 routing and remote access machine that was acting as the gateway and performing NAT for Internet access for our local clients. In this setup the cisco VPN clients had no problem connecting to the vpn concentrator. The only difference in any

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=503 siqhamo@newlunar.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=507 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-08-29