Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "[Bug 479] New: tunnel0 and br0"
2006 May 22
6
[Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479
------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-05-22 14:42 MET -------
It is not entirely clear what you are trying to show with that LOG line.
How is the traffic flowing, what do you expect? And why is it visible
in plaintext on the br0 device? Please also include your kernel version.
--
Configure bugmail:
2006 Jun 28
7
[Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479
netfilter@linuxace.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com
------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-06-28 02:57 MET -------
Tom - did
2005 Feb 13
2
GRE tunnel problems
Hello,
Here is my network:
------------------ -------------
----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ----------
------------------ -------------
What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the
GRE tunnel.
No packets are being passed thought the GRE
2004 Aug 12
0
Advanced Routing and FreeSwan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I''m trying to setup a central IPSEC-Gateway with several ipsec tunnels.
Some are to be routed over one leased line, some over the other leased
line. Both leased lines have their own public ip adress.
The setup looks kinda like this:
eth1(ipsec0)--ISP0--Internet--eth1-Linux1-eth0--Subnet1
/
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] When I add br0 (brctl addbr br0), and I show bridge list (brctl show) it's eth0 which is in the list. It's a bug ?
All is in subject.
Example :
root@harobed:~ # brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
root@harobed:~ # ifconfig
lo Lien encap:Boucle locale
inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0.0
adr inet6: ::1/128 Scope:H?te
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:16510 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] why ./brctl showmacs br0 display nothing?
hi:
my box use eth0 connect my pc. but I type command "./brctl showmacs br0", no mac addr display and the" brctl showmacs program" not exit,always exec
# ./brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.000123456789 no eth0
hdlc0
# ./brctl showmacs br0
2010 Jul 07
0
xend start (not building br0 or vif interfaces)
I''ve just gotten xen-4.0.1-rc4-pre on top of Ubuntu 10.04 using the 2.6.32.15 kernel source installed and booting into Dom0 thanks to you guys!
I was under the impression that xend would setup at least a basic bridge interface and some vif interfaces automaticlly.. I don''t get any of that. And when I try to start xend manually after reboot I get:
ifdown: interface eth0 not
2005 Dec 22
0
eth0/xen-br0 Problems
Hello,
I am working with Xen 2.0.7; when I create my Dom0 it does not move eth0
onto the xen-br0 like it suppose to resulting in no network connectivity
in Dom0. Why does this happen and what must I do to fix it? Thanks.
Kashif
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2013 Oct 16
0
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using Libvirt 1.1.2 with Openstack Havana (RC2, nova-network) and
> openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-9.1. Libvirt vif driver (
> nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtGenericVIFDriver) generates config likes this:
>
> <interface type='bridge'>
> <mac
2013 Oct 16
2
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
On 16 October 2013 13:55, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a host mis-configuration related to kernel bridge support
> to me.
>
Could you tell me what might be mis-configured? I am using kernel 3.10.11,
modules openvswitch, bridge, stp and llc are loaded.
regards
--
Maciej Gałkiewicz
Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin
http://shellycloud.com/,
2013 Oct 16
0
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:04:47PM +0200, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote:
> On 16 October 2013 13:55, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like a host mis-configuration related to kernel bridge support
> > to me.
> >
>
> Could you tell me what might be mis-configured? I am using kernel 3.10.11,
> modules openvswitch, bridge, stp and llc
2019 Feb 24
0
SAMBA DNS interfaces set to br0
Am 24.02.19 um 16:51 schrieb Brian Davis via samba:
> On a machine with virtual networking is enabled and two ether net
> controllers eth0/192.168.1.2 and eth1/192.168.1.3 and having SAMBA smb.conf
> set to:
>
> dns interfaces = lo br0
>
> is there a chance for:
>
> 1) The system not to boot with DNS working
> 2) The DNS server bounce between eth0 and eth1
> 3)
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] how to silence the "br0: port X(ethX) doing something" messages?
Greetings,
I'm just wondering how one can make the bridging tools stop spamming the virtual
consoles? I would rather have all those "entering forwarding state", "entering
learning state" and "entering disabled state" messages go to a log than have
them plastered all over whichever console I happened to be logged into to work.
Thanks!
--
Martin-Eric Racine
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] modprobe: modprobe cannot locate br0 modules
Hi,
I added below code in /etc/rc.d/rc.local in order to load the bridge
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth0
brctl addif br0 wlan0
ifconfig br0 up
but it fail, i found error in /var/log/message
said
localhost: modprobe: modprobe cannot locate br0 modules
but i found it said suceedly up the br0 interface
anyone know?
=====
Ô¸ÄúÓÀÔ¶ÐÒ¸££¬¿ìÀֺͰ²Ïê Happy & Healthy Always ! ^_^ !
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] Crash on "brctl stp br0"
Hello!
"brctl stp br0" would crash brctl provided that br0 is a bridge. This is
caused by incorrect number of arguments in the commands table. "stp" needs
at least 2 arguments after "stp". The patch against version 1.0.4 is
attached.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
-------------- next part --------------
--- brctl/brctl_cmd.c
+++ brctl/brctl_cmd.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Re: bridge can't get ip by "dhcpcd br0"
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:53:08 +0800 (CST)
"vanyew" <vanyew@mail2000.com.tw> wrote:
> Dear Stephen,
>
> I'm a Linux embedded developer.
> We want to build the bridge function on our product.
>
> We use brctl to build the bridge device.
>
> [root@localhost /]# brctl show
> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
>
2013 Oct 16
2
libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
Hi
I am using Libvirt 1.1.2 with Openstack Havana (RC2, nova-network) and
openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-9.1. Libvirt vif driver (
nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtGenericVIFDriver) generates config likes this:
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='fa:16:3e:44:30:a4'/>
<source bridge='br0'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (2.6.12.3)
Hi Robert,
2. Any ideas of something to try in order to make this repeatable?
> =
What i would do to reproduce it, is make a script establishing the bridge, =
then flooding the bridge with some external ping -f, then shuting down the =
bridge. If there is a refcount release problem, it should appear on eavy =
load (some buffer overflow, or something like that).
Also, are you playing with
2017 Jul 03
2
Broken br0
Hello,
I wanted to get an extra IP on my local NIC, so I ran `sudo ip addr add
192.168.1.130/24 dev enp4s0`. This didn't work as intended, so I thought
I'd restart the Ubuntu system to have things back to how they were.
Alas, this didn't happen. While the host still has network as usual, none
of the VMs are able to get a DHCP lease from the router, or any
connectivity at all.
I can
2019 Mar 26
0
Re: Error starting domain: internal error: Unable to add port vnet0 to OVS bridge br0
I added libvirt-users@redhat.com back to the Cc for this response.
Please don't remove the list address when responding to postings on a
mailing list. A message to the list is *much* more likely to reach
someone who knows the answer than is a private message to a single person.
On 3/26/19 10:03 AM, Harsh Gondaliya wrote:
> Mar 26 19:25:01 dpdk-OptiPlex-5040 libvirtd.service: 20423: