similar to: [Bug 479] New: tunnel0 and br0

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "[Bug 479] New: tunnel0 and br0"

2006 May 22
6
[Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-05-22 14:42 MET ------- It is not entirely clear what you are trying to show with that LOG line. How is the traffic flowing, what do you expect? And why is it visible in plaintext on the br0 device? Please also include your kernel version. -- Configure bugmail:
2006 Jun 28
7
[Bug 479] tunnel0 and br0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-06-28 02:57 MET ------- Tom - did
2005 Feb 13
2
GRE tunnel problems
Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE
2004 Aug 12
0
Advanced Routing and FreeSwan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m trying to setup a central IPSEC-Gateway with several ipsec tunnels. Some are to be routed over one leased line, some over the other leased line. Both leased lines have their own public ip adress. The setup looks kinda like this: eth1(ipsec0)--ISP0--Internet--eth1-Linux1-eth0--Subnet1 /
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] When I add br0 (brctl addbr br0), and I show bridge list (brctl show) it's eth0 which is in the list. It's a bug ?
All is in subject. Example : root@harobed:~ # brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces root@harobed:~ # ifconfig lo Lien encap:Boucle locale inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0.0 adr inet6: ::1/128 Scope:H?te UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:16510 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] why ./brctl showmacs br0 display nothing?
hi: my box use eth0 connect my pc. but I type command "./brctl showmacs br0", no mac addr display and the" brctl showmacs program" not exit,always exec # ./brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.000123456789 no eth0 hdlc0 # ./brctl showmacs br0
2010 Jul 07
0
xend start (not building br0 or vif interfaces)
I''ve just gotten xen-4.0.1-rc4-pre on top of Ubuntu 10.04 using the 2.6.32.15 kernel source installed and booting into Dom0 thanks to you guys! I was under the impression that xend would setup at least a basic bridge interface and some vif interfaces automaticlly.. I don''t get any of that. And when I try to start xend manually after reboot I get: ifdown: interface eth0 not
2005 Dec 22
0
eth0/xen-br0 Problems
Hello, I am working with Xen 2.0.7; when I create my Dom0 it does not move eth0 onto the xen-br0 like it suppose to resulting in no network connectivity in Dom0. Why does this happen and what must I do to fix it? Thanks. Kashif _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2013 Oct 16
0
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote: > Hi > > I am using Libvirt 1.1.2 with Openstack Havana (RC2, nova-network) and > openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-9.1. Libvirt vif driver ( > nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtGenericVIFDriver) generates config likes this: > > <interface type='bridge'> > <mac
2013 Oct 16
2
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
On 16 October 2013 13:55, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > Sounds like a host mis-configuration related to kernel bridge support > to me. > Could you tell me what might be mis-configured? I am using kernel 3.10.11, modules openvswitch, bridge, stp and llc are loaded. regards -- Maciej Gałkiewicz Shelly Cloud Sp. z o. o., Sysadmin http://shellycloud.com/,
2013 Oct 16
0
Re: libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:04:47PM +0200, Maciej Gałkiewicz wrote: > On 16 October 2013 13:55, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Sounds like a host mis-configuration related to kernel bridge support > > to me. > > > > Could you tell me what might be mis-configured? I am using kernel 3.10.11, > modules openvswitch, bridge, stp and llc
2019 Feb 24
0
SAMBA DNS interfaces set to br0
Am 24.02.19 um 16:51 schrieb Brian Davis via samba: > On a machine with virtual networking is enabled and two ether net > controllers eth0/192.168.1.2 and eth1/192.168.1.3 and having SAMBA smb.conf > set to: > > dns interfaces = lo br0 > > is there a chance for: > > 1) The system not to boot with DNS working > 2) The DNS server bounce between eth0 and eth1 > 3)
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] how to silence the "br0: port X(ethX) doing something" messages?
Greetings, I'm just wondering how one can make the bridging tools stop spamming the virtual consoles? I would rather have all those "entering forwarding state", "entering learning state" and "entering disabled state" messages go to a log than have them plastered all over whichever console I happened to be logged into to work. Thanks! -- Martin-Eric Racine
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] modprobe: modprobe cannot locate br0 modules
Hi, I added below code in /etc/rc.d/rc.local in order to load the bridge brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 wlan0 ifconfig br0 up but it fail, i found error in /var/log/message said localhost: modprobe: modprobe cannot locate br0 modules but i found it said suceedly up the br0 interface anyone know? ===== Ô¸ÄúÓÀÔ¶ÐÒ¸££¬¿ìÀֺͰ²Ïê Happy & Healthy Always ! ^_^ !
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] [PATCH] Crash on "brctl stp br0"
Hello! "brctl stp br0" would crash brctl provided that br0 is a bridge. This is caused by incorrect number of arguments in the commands table. "stp" needs at least 2 arguments after "stp". The patch against version 1.0.4 is attached. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin -------------- next part -------------- --- brctl/brctl_cmd.c +++ brctl/brctl_cmd.c @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@
2007 Apr 18
0
[Bridge] Re: bridge can't get ip by "dhcpcd br0"
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:53:08 +0800 (CST) "vanyew" <vanyew@mail2000.com.tw> wrote: > Dear Stephen, > > I'm a Linux embedded developer. > We want to build the bridge function on our product. > > We use brctl to build the bridge device. > > [root@localhost /]# brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >
2013 Oct 16
2
libvirtError: Unable to add bridge br0 port vnet0: Operation not supported
Hi I am using Libvirt 1.1.2 with Openstack Havana (RC2, nova-network) and openvswitch 1.4.2+git20120612-9.1. Libvirt vif driver ( nova.virt.libvirt.vif.LibvirtGenericVIFDriver) generates config likes this: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='fa:16:3e:44:30:a4'/> <source bridge='br0'/> <model type='virtio'/>
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] unregister_netdevice: waiting for br0 to become free. Usage count = 1 (2.6.12.3)
Hi Robert, 2. Any ideas of something to try in order to make this repeatable? > = What i would do to reproduce it, is make a script establishing the bridge, = then flooding the bridge with some external ping -f, then shuting down the = bridge. If there is a refcount release problem, it should appear on eavy = load (some buffer overflow, or something like that). Also, are you playing with
2017 Jul 03
2
Broken br0
Hello, I wanted to get an extra IP on my local NIC, so I ran `sudo ip addr add 192.168.1.130/24 dev enp4s0`. This didn't work as intended, so I thought I'd restart the Ubuntu system to have things back to how they were. Alas, this didn't happen. While the host still has network as usual, none of the VMs are able to get a DHCP lease from the router, or any connectivity at all. I can
2019 Mar 26
0
Re: Error starting domain: internal error: Unable to add port vnet0 to OVS bridge br0
I added libvirt-users@redhat.com back to the Cc for this response. Please don't remove the list address when responding to postings on a mailing list. A message to the list is *much* more likely to reach someone who knows the answer than is a private message to a single person. On 3/26/19 10:03 AM, Harsh Gondaliya wrote: > Mar 26 19:25:01 dpdk-OptiPlex-5040 libvirtd.service: 20423: