similar to: [Bug 473] New: 2.6.16.x translates addresses of RELATED packets incorrectly

Hi! I am trying to use hping to chek the latency of our network. Somehow things are not going to plan and I thought someone might be able to shed some light on the subject. Here is the setup: (the IP addresses gvien here are fake, but they do represent the correct state of the networking setup) vlan interface IP mask V2 eth0 192.168.20.20 32

> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:05 AM > To: Steve Herber > Cc: Shorewall Development > Subject: Re: [Shorewall-devel] RE: [Shorewall-users] SMTP outbound > problem (fwd) > > > On Mon, 13 May 2002, Steve Herber wrote: > > > I think we should add an FAQ entry for tcp_ecn. > >

Hi... I have installed ip route 2 package on Linux kernel 2.4.25 I am using 2 tables: ################################### ebox:100.254~# ip route list table ALTER default via 192.168.100.253 dev br0 ebox:100.254~# ip route list table main 10.0.0.254 dev ppp0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.1 192.168.100.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.100.254 192.168.100.0/24 dev

Hi, I am setting up a firewall on CENTOS 4.4. I have done default block iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP I have enabled ICMP to www.google.com iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp -d 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -s 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT Ping works fine as below [root at firebox rc.d]# ping 64.233.189.104 PING 64.233.189.104 (

hi, I have a debian system with shorewall acting as a router between my adsl line and my local network. One of the things on that local network is my playstation, and I''m having trouble playing an online game with it - the game tries to access the internet, and then fails at the stage where it tries to find the game servers. The debian machine is 192.168.0.3, and the playstation is

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Summary: REDIRECT target translates all packets' destination to main IP of interface Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=472 kaber@trash.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-04-21

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-01-25

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:473-01 Moderate: lesstif security update Files available: lesstif-0.93.15-4.AS21.5.i386.rpm lesstif-devel-0.93.15-4.AS21.5.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1342 Bug ID: 1342 Summary: IPv6 NAT translates to addresses outside of specified range Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=473 Summary: cannot update password using PAM on HP-UX system that has been tsconverted Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: older versions Platform: All OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

Hi List Asterisk 16.28.0 in use. PJSIP in use Two endpoints Both using IPv6 One Endpoint on UDP, the other via TLS. Both with: t38_udptl=yes ;fax_detect=yes ;fax_detect_timeout=30 rtp_ipv6=yes Both sides are T.38 capable and detect fax tone so no need for fax detection on asterisk. Voice calls between the two work fine. But on a Fax call, I see this situation: A <=> Asterisk

On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Martin Maechler wrote: > >>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian D Ripley <ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: > > BDR> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Trenkler, Dietrich wrote: > >> I think I've discovered what went wrong. > >> > >> My workspace included a function wilcox.test formerly copied from > >>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > severity 384638 important Bug#384638: Dom0 dows not boot with kernel package linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 version 2.6.16-18 Severity set to `important' from `critical' > reassign 384638 xen-3.0 Bug#384638: Dom0 dows not boot with kernel package linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 version 2.6.16-18 Bug reassigned from package

Hello, Is there some things removed from the kernel.org kernels before the get into xen-unstable? I was just about to compile a new dom0 kernel, and couldn''t find the option for Buslogic SCSI driver i xen-unstable kernel synced earlier this morning. I find this a bit strange, as I know the option is there in kernel.org''s 2.6.16-rc2. The config option was somehow lost in 2.6.15

New version of iproute2 is available. No major changes, mostly just small bug fixes. http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.16-060323.tar.gz James Lentini Increase size of hw address allowed for ip neigh to allow for IB. Russell Stuart Fix missing memset in tc sample Add sample divisor Alpt Add more rt_proto values Dale Sedivec Warn when using

Hi, are there any patches for getting linux kernel 2.6.16.* working with xen 3.0.2. A friend told me .1 works fine, and .5 does not work at all, but maybe that information is outdated? Also there seem to be a number of security issues (2.6.16.9 was released today), so it would be nice if we could use the latest stable kernel with these fixes. are there patches to fix any problem with xen

Hello All, This is my first post to this list, though I''ve been following Xen''s development since the beginning (well, after news about it first broke, anyway). I''ve been wanting to try it out, and hopefully consolidate a few servers here, so I finally made the decision to do just that. I''ve downloaded the RHEL 4.1 RPMs from the xensource.com website, and

I tried building a 2.6.16 kernel from -unstable and also the -xenU kernel provided by FC5 and both will not run under 3.0-testing (changeset 8761:484a14acfc26). The 2.6.16 kernel will start and die with nothing of value in xend.log or xend-debug.log. If I run "xm create name -c" it will say it can''t open "/dev/pts/XX" and that is all the information I can

Not sure if this is a pkg-xen issue or for the debian kernel people, trying here first since the patch I applied is created from the pkg-xen project % apt-get source xen-3.0 % cd xen-3.0-3.0.2+hg9646/ % make mkpatches % cd /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.16 % patch -p1 < ../linux-2.6-xen.patch % cp ../config-2.6.16-1-amd64-k8 .config % make-kpkg --append-to-version -1-xen-3.2.0-d0 binary