similar to: [Bug 13] have iptables compile without '-O2'

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=470 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Severity|blocker |normal ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2004-09-18 01:59 CEST ------- For the record, this patch allows it to compile: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-September/016718.html but not sure why this is important, or whether the above mindless fix misses anything. -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=470 Summary: Can't compile kernel with new iptables Product: iptables Version: 1.3.4 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OS/Version| |All ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=444 Summary: REDIRECT not working in kernel 2.6.16-rc[12] as before (<= 2.6.15.x) Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT

I *think* we are finally making some progress in tracking our elusive performance problems. After employing a second 10Mb link from our ISP, along with another firewall box and proxy, we were able to determine the problem *is* our firewall. We don''t know exactly why yet, but our sporadic slow web access seems to have gone away since swapping a new firewall in this morning. The

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1728 Bug ID: 1728 Summary: Regression: iptables lock is now waited for without --wait Product: iptables Version: 1.8.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: unknown

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161 Bug ID: 1161 Summary: The lock problem causes the iptables return with exit code 0 without adding my rules to kernel. Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732 Summary: Iptables 1.4.11 or 1.4.12 does not compile on CentOS 5.6 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:

I just recompiled a plain vanilla 2.4.28 kernel, and used the Shorewall.net kernel config as a guideline. For some reason, I get this: Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: Shorewall has detected the following iptables/netfilter capabilities: Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: NAT: Available Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: Packet Mangling: Available Nov 30 12:05:34 fw shorewall: Multi-port Match:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571 Summary: Compile of iptables 1.4.2 with testing Linux kernel 2.6.29-rc2 fails - workaround included Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1333 Bug ID: 1333 Summary: 1.8.2: build fails with gcc 9 Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 ------- Additional Comments From scrizt@ludd.ltu.se 2006-06-26 17:57 MET ------- Is this bug forgotten ? Anyhow, I ran into it when setting up this strange network of mine.. I dont think my setup is causing anything strange however.. It appears even if no machine is connected to the "inner" port of the bridge.. I

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=451 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-18 19:35 MET ------- Which

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=833 Summary: iptables --with-kernel=/usr/src/linux against kernel {3.9.9, 3.10} fatal error: asm/cache.h: No such file or directory Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=444 ------- Additional Comments From spiney@spiney.org 2006-02-08 19:18 MET ------- Created an attachment (id=207) --> (https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=207&action=view) kernel 2.6.15, telnet localhost 10025 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -------

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=886 Summary: iptables-xml segfaults on "-APOSTROUTING" Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: unknown AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh at medozas.de --- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> 2011-03-03 14:20:30

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rusty@netfilter.org Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW