similar to: [Bug 445] New: ipt_account reports: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2063

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account

Hi, I''d like to account the data going out to an interface after shaping and policing. At the moment, I''m using ipt_ACCOUNT for per-IP accounting, but it counts packets regardless if they are dropped or not. Using tc counters directly would force me to install one tc rule per IP which I''d rather avoid. My idea was to use tc actions with ipt_ACCOUNT, but I have no idea

Hi, at my local university network, I have to make sure no student uploads more than x GB/day. So far, I give them unlimited bandwidth until they have more than y GB (y<x) upload. After that, I use the u32 filter to associate the affected IP address with a HTB class limited to the rate (remainingtraffic/remainingtime). Since the accounting is done with ipt_ACCOUNT right now and the netfilter

Hi, My branch office as got a 256Kbps b/w from their service provider at a very very high rate per Mb. They don''t require 256Kbps at all but the ISP does not offer anything low. Can we restrict the bandwith to say 64Kbps nothing fancy? How do I go about it? With warm regards, -Payal

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Hey guys, I am planning to buy some components for a Linux router that will handle the Internet access of 200 computers (includes tc shaping) and some inter sub-network routing (at least 100MBps per eth - and there are 3 eth cards). I was thinking of a: Pentium 4 - 3GHz 256 or 512MB RAM Network Cards. Now - I wonder what is more important: the processor speed or the amount of RAM. And can you

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2063 Bug ID: 2063 Summary: RFE: export principal which was used for .k5login Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> wrote: > > N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is > using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet. Further, no mirrors have been spotted, which is not to say there

Quoting Karolin Seeger (kseeger at samba.org): > Release Announcements > ===================== > > This is a security release in order to address CVE-2010-2063. > > > o CVE-2010-2063: > In Samba 3.3.x and below, a buffer overrun is possible in chain_reply code. As this issue also affect the 3.2 series of samba (which is no longer officially supported by the Samba

Hello Everybody, I have configured a Linux box that does traffic shaping. Its working wonderfully fine, just as expected...Now i want to measure the bandwidth consumed by each of my hosts....But I dont want SNMP to run on all the hosts[as required by MRTG] I used iptraf on my linux box, but it only measures the bandwidth on interface basis only.... I tried installing traffic-vis, its not working