similar to: [Bug 429] -j REDIRECT does not appear to work correctly

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=429 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-02-26 00:29 MET ------- When you do this: netstat -an | grep LISTEN do you see 0.0.0.0:9080 or does the 9080 line list a specific IP? Also, is 216.152.242.200 the primary IP address of the incoming interface, or a secondary? -- Configure bugmail:

Hello, everyone! I would like to solve the following problem. Btw, I''m terribly sorry about the pseudo-asciiart, but that''s all I can paint as a tropology. I''m hoping it''ll be enough. ----Internet---- | | | eth0 machine A routing+ipchains eth1 | ------------------ machine B So, given I''m running kernel 2.4.19 and using ipchains

Been running this for quite a while and noticed that have intermittent problems getting out. Find that if I ping the same site from 2 computers it may work on one and fail on the other. Also was surprised that some time they are going out different interfaces at the same time. Seems to work all the time from the firewall. Running 2.6.10 kernel with the multipath routing patches on a debian

Hi, i''m a shorewall users and i have the following problem: I have one class C range of IP''s and i have three zones (net, dmz , loc) I need create one rule to dnat one valid ip address (but not in use in one computer) to one invalid host in my loc zone. How i do? I try this: DNAT net:200.200.200.200 dmz:200.193.137.38 tcp 137,138,139,445 -

Hello I have a PC with 2 IPs publics IP1 in eth0 and IP2 in eth0:0 I want to do a redirection of IP2 to an other public IP IP3 in an other laptop (other network) - for all ports : IP2 ---> IP3 - for juste www : IP2:www --> IP3:www i tried many combination with shorewall-3.0.7-4, but no sucess no help from google, Thanks in advance Laurent

I have a NetGear FV318 living in my DMZ, with one of its LAN-ports living in my LOC zone. What rules are needed in shorewall to allow a certain subnet to make connections to this device from the net zone? Do I define it as a tunnel in shorewall/tunnels, or do I just allow some selected traffic to the DMZ IP? I am not sure which of the docs are right for me in this case?

Hi all, I''ve a routing problem. I''m setting up a router based on debian (kernel 2.4). I need to setup routing to export an ftp service (ftp server is in dmz) to 2 wan (both). I setup prerouting ad forward rule with no problem. The problem is that reply packet use default gateway (default wan) even though they are enter using the other wan. I solved it marking packets in input

I''m having another little problem with my new firewall. I want outgoing port 25 from my mail server to appear on the address 65.223.121.227 so I created the file masq: eth2 192.168.124.18 65.223.121.227 tcp 25 eth1 eth5 eth1 eth3 eth1 eth4 eth1 == net0 == 209.189.103.196/27 eth2 == net1 == 65.223.121.237/28 eth3 == dmz0 eth4 == dmz1 eth5 == loc ==

I am setting to a shorewall system with 4 NIC''s as per the outline specification below. Can anyone please have a look and let me know what I have missed and what I have got wrong as I want to take this system live ASAP but do not want to kill internet access and the hosting for too long ! I have listed below the system outline & have attached the config files that I have changed, if

I suppose a few questions pop up on this list about access Samba through a firewall. ?I have been very successful running Samba through a firewall, until today. ?I hit a stumbling block. I have a Linux Firewall with the public IP Address of 134.x.x.140 <it is not the exact ip address, but close>. ?I am using NAT and port forwarding to send traffic destined for 137, 138,139, and 445 for BOTH

Does anyone have any idea what to try next? Here are the steps I have taken and the problem: (I wanted to post my question on the first line before I explained the problem and what I have tried) ---------- Node 0 has the file system mounted just fine and works great. When trying to mount on Node 1: `mount.ocfs2 /dev/mapper/data /cluster/ data` I get this error after about 30 seconds:

Is there a way to add a rule to the nat table (CentOS 5.7) that would alter the port number of tcp packets destined for the server itself? I have ip_forwarding enabled, but the packets don't seem to hit the prerouting chain. I have the following redirect rule in the prerouting table. I also tried DNAT, but if the packets don't hit PREROUTING, it won't work either. iptables -t nat

Hi, I have a linux box with two dsl modems on it (connection is done via pppoe), I''m trying to route default traffic on the primary connection (ppp0) and mail traffic on another one (ppp1). This traffic will come from the localhost. I run Slackware 9.1 (Kernel 2.4.22), recompiled with necessary options for using iproute2. According to the advanced routing howto, I did the following

Hi There, I've been having an issue trying to figure out a way to policy route outbound packets from a multihomed machine through the proper interface using IPFW to no avail. I've tried several different incantations of IPFW fwd/forward statements, and none of them seem to do the trick. Basically, I have a host that has multiple Internet connections. This host is running FreeBSD 4.9

hy Hope everyone is fine, I have one issue coming in asterisk , What i am doing is i am generating a callback if some one calls at a specif access number on asterisk, Asterisk sends a busy signal to the calling party that he received a request from party and then sends the call back to the person from where asterisk received a request but in From field as you can see below astrisk is sending the

I have a simple script: #!/bin/bash # index=0 total=0 names=() ip=() while read -r LINE do NODENAME=` echo $LINE | cut -f 1 -d ','` IP=` echo $LINE | cut -f 2 -d ','` names[index]="$NODENAME" ip[index]="$IP" index=`expr index+1` total=`expr total+1` done <<< $(cat list.txt) simple file: more list.txt name1,ip1 name2,ip2 name3,ip3 output when

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10035 Summary: rsync hangs in solaris Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: nestor.urquiza at gmail.com QAContact:

Dear All. I want to use 'not' for 2 addresses (for both) in ipfw2 rule. The only way that looks like what I need is # ipfw add count from IP1 to not IP2,IP3 But does this rule indeed makes what I want? Does it count all packets destined to addresses other then IP2 AND IP3?! No other syntax works. For example more logically correct not IP2 AND not IP3 or even not { IP2 or IP3 } are

WINS nsswitch module -------------------- The WINS nsswitch module has been rewritten to address memory issues and to simplify the code. The module now uses libwbclient to do WINS queries. This means that winbind needs to be running in order to resolve WINS names using the nss_wins module. This does not affect smbd. my problem: old versions >> ping google.com >> PING google.com

Hi All, I''m a big user of the LARTC document but am currently stuck with a question around section 4.2 (http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html) in relation to "Routing for multiple uplinks/providers". I''m wanting to do a similar setup to the diagram where I have - lets just say for the moment - two uplink providers where I want to route over two