similar to: [Bug 73] ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "[Bug 73] ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd"

2003 Apr 02
0
[Bug 73] New: ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73 Summary: ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:
2003 Apr 02
0
[Bug 72] New: ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 Summary: ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo:
2003 Apr 02
0
[Bug 72] ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@taner.net 2003-04-03 00:48 ------- *** Bug 73 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2004 Sep 09
0
[Bug 72] ICMPs sent by REJECT are not getting SNAT'd
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 gandalf@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From gandalf@netfilter.org
2014 Dec 30
2
[Bug 993] New: nft produces incorrect output when a reject rule is added using nft -f
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993 Bug ID: 993 Summary: nft produces incorrect output when a reject rule is added using nft -f Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft
2018 Nov 16
2
[Bug 1298] New: Issue with REJECT in custom chains
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 Bug ID: 1298 Summary: Issue with REJECT in custom chains Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo
2014 Dec 02
3
[Bug 988] New: manpage: mention that REJECT should be used with care
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988 Bug ID: 988 Summary: manpage: mention that REJECT should be used with care Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:
2014 May 07
4
[Bug 926] New: icmp: ICMPv6 types are not supported
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=926 Summary: icmp: ICMPv6 types are not supported Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2013 Jan 29
2
[Bug 808] New: Wrong packet and byte counters when using DROP/REJECT targets and UDP protocol match
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=808 Summary: Wrong packet and byte counters when using DROP/REJECT targets and UDP protocol match Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables
2013 Aug 27
0
[Bug 531] Bridge + ip_forward + REJECT with tcp-reset not working as intended
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com AssignedTo|kaber at trash.net |netfilter-buglog at lists.netf
2003 Mar 20
2
[Bug 66] INPUT REJECT target needs state creation in OUTPUT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-20 11:00 ------- what kernel are you running? which patches (from patch-o-matic) did you apply? please give us some more information :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2013 Jun 20
0
[Bug 696] Extra tcp options for REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset-both / tcp-reset-destination
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com --- Comment #2 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-20
2014 May 07
1
[Bug 925] New: icmp: ICMPv4 types are not supported
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=925 Summary: icmp: ICMPv4 types are not supported Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy:
2013 Aug 02
1
[Bug 837] New: Large ICMP packets are lost
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=837 Summary: Large ICMP packets are lost Product: libnetfilter_queue Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: libnetfilter_queue AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2013 Jun 21
0
[Bug 696] Extra tcp options for REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset-both / tcp-reset-destination
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696 --- Comment #4 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-21 20:09:31 CEST --- > The kernel manages the seq and > ack_seq counters itself, so it doesn't have to try ...for locally terminated connections, yes. But what about forwarded traffic? That is where the difficulty comes in. Netfilter would need to be able to
2013 Aug 28
0
[Bug 531] Bridge + ip_forward + REJECT with tcp-reset not working as intended
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Phil Oester <netfilter
2013 Jun 22
0
[Bug 696] Extra tcp options for REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset-both / tcp-reset-destination
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696 --- Comment #5 from Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> 2013-06-22 10:05:55 CEST --- (In reply to comment #4) >> The kernel manages the seq and ack_seq counters itself, so it doesn't have >> to try > > ...for locally terminated connections, yes. But what about forwarded traffic? > That is where the difficulty
2020 Mar 01
0
[Bug 1412] New: ip6tables-nft not accepting "icmp" as shorthand for "icmpv6"
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412 Bug ID: 1412 Summary: ip6tables-nft not accepting "icmp" as shorthand for "icmpv6" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5
2003 Feb 26
0
[Bug 55] New: ICMP translation problem with local NAT
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55 Summary: ICMP translation problem with local NAT Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org
2011 Mar 03
2
[Bug 706] Iptables randomly reject some packets that have accept rule
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jengelh at medozas.de --- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh at medozas.de> 2011-03-03 14:20:30