similar to: [Bug 65] Problem with error message when tcp-flags doesn't recognize a flag

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65 Summary: Problem with error message when tcp-flags doesn't recognize a flag Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=534 Summary: --mss in tcp.man Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rusty@netfilter.org Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82 Summary: iptables doesn't compile if no optimization flags are set Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: other OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110 Summary: TCP connection tracking Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: connection tracking AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601 Summary: log messages with flags "ACK PSH FIN" Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo: laforge at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=466 Summary: u.tcp used where u.udp should be, in tftp nat helper Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1450 Bug ID: 1450 Summary: Using certain simple set combinations with TCP flags causes error in mergesort.c from nft list ruleset Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: arm OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Summary: iptables doesn't support multiple times the same match in one rule Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542 laforge at netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge at netfilter.org |kaber at trash.net -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=574 Summary: nf_conntrack_ftp.c ignores RFC 1123 regarding parentheses in FTP passive mode message 227 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |minor Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From aliz@gentoo.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 Summary: pptp-conntrack-nat and sparc64 structures/padding/maskcomp bug Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: sparc64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: connection

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56 Summary: super-long erroneous timeouts in conntrack table (semantics of list_del() change) Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: other URL: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|linux-2.4.x |patch-o-matic ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-25 10:03 ------- I don't know what