similar to: [Bug 63] New: fwmark loopback routing issue

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-30 21:29 ------- I can confirm this bug, it

I''m having trouble routing on high fwmarks, I want to use a lot of different marks for 2 routes so that I can QoS based on the marks ip rule looks like this: 0: from all lookup local 32751: from all fwmark 31 lookup dslout 32752: from all fwmark 30 lookup dslout 32753: from all fwmark 29 lookup dslout 32754: from all fwmark 28 lookup dslout 32755: from

Hello all, I am working with kernel 2.2.20 with the necessary options configured into the kernel to support all of the wonderfully fancy routing features: - routing based on ToS - routing based on fwmark - multiple routing tables This same kernel is in use elsewhere, and is routing based on fwmark with success. This leads me to believe that my kernel is OK and that I have another

I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via DSL1. So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to go. On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked ssh. # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup

Hi list, I''m new to this list, I just subscribed because I have some ackward about IPRoute2. First, while playing with NetFilter'' "MARK" target, I met a weird behaviour once I tried to use this marks in the RPDB : the packets where successfully marked, but it seemed that RPDB didn''t succed in matching them (for those who already know the answer, I only used

Hi all, I need to route local generated packages depending on which tcp or udp service I need to use. To accomplish this I have configured two routing tables: [root at lothlorien ~]# ip ru ls 0: from all lookup 255 32762: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup FirstLan 32763: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup SecondLan 32764: from 172.25.80.10 lookup SecondLan 32765: from 172.25.70.18 lookup FirstLan

Hi, I''ve got 2 lines from two diffrent ISP''s, one is a leased line and another a DSL line, I route certain ips over the DSL line for faster access and would like email to go over the leased line as it has a static ip and is our sending mailserver ip I would like to send mail to the same ips that is routed over DSL via the leased line, otherwise my server gets blacklisted with

Hi, I have a computer which is used as router/firewall/VPN with four network card. One connected on the LAN (br0, 10.0.0.0/24), the three others to three different ISP, eth0 192.168.1.0/29, eth1 192.168.0.0/24, eth2 192.168.2.0/29. This computer is under Linux 2.6.11 with the Julian Anastasov routes patch. The configuration by default is to balance the load on the three interfaces. Then, I

Hi everybody, I''m trying to set up routing for 2 links to the internet on a box which produces traffic itself (e.g. DNS) and will route all our local traffic. AS one route is quick and expensive and the other one slow and cheap, I want to be able to route packets for some high-level protocols to the second link. If I correctly understood table 3-2 in

Hi all, Below is my network diagram: - eth0 (adsl 1) eth1 (adsl 2) | | | | | | | | ----------------- | | | Gateway | | | ----------------- | | | tun0 Below is my iptables scripting to mark certain ports: -

Hello.. How can I specify a class for htb based on a fwmark and user ip ? For instance: I have some routes marked with fwmark and their are very-high speed connections... But only to some IP''s.. For the rest , I must limit the user to 64Kbits Now , how can I limit the high speed connections ? I must create a rule and take in account both fwmark and IP ? To be more specific , I want

Hi, Here I am trying something simple. My objective is to make ip rule fwmark command work :) Network Diagram: --- 192.168.250.197 (eth0) Linux Box (eth1) 192.168.8.88 -------------192.168.8.122 (eth0) Windows XP Client Configuration done on Linux Box:- (1) [root@g webauth]# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 5 [root@g webauth]# iptables -t mangle -L Chain PREROUTING (policy

Witam wszystkich After few days with yours help I''ve succeeded with setup of load-balancing. Now I have problem with next step. I want to mark some packets and than put them to the one of the routing tables to force them going via only one interface with only one ip. Easy?? Ofcourse, but not for me :(. I''m NOT using NAT. Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 71 packets, 24227

Hi, I''ve read ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO/implementation.htm l#AEN166 and I''ve a doubt from script: [ ... ] # DNS name resolution (small packets) iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p udp -j MARK --set-mark 21 [ ... ] That is a bug ? I think that " DNS name resolution (small packets) " is better

Could someone comment on the benefits of using CLASSIFY vs fwmark (or vice versa) in iptables? I''m getting ready to implement some basic tc for VoIP and most of the examples seem to use the (older?) fwmark syntax. Should I convert these to CLASSIFY? Can the two syntaxes be mixed? Also with U32? TIA, Edwin -- <=+=+=+==+=+=+==+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=> Edwin Whitelaw, P.E. New River

Hi all, I want to divide the incoming traffic between what should go to the firewall and what should be forwarded to the local network behind it. I started with the IMQ example config, but added an extra htb class right below "10:1" to get the two sfq''s to borrow each other''s bandwidth. However, I can''t figure out how to set the two marks. According to this

I made a script to test if in a moultiple gateway setup all default connection are up, regardless of the fact that that gateway is the default gw. Suppose adsl1 and adsl2 are present, and all traffic goes by default to adsl1, and you want to test if adsl2 is ok. 1. I use mangles from iptables to mark icmp packets to some test machines 2. I set up a routing table for each adsl 3. I use

Hello, I''m trying to get my shaper to work, but have only a partial success. Can someone help me with that. My setup unfortunately is not so trivial, but I think some people could have similar one... 1. There is a router connected to the internet line via interface eth0 2. There are users connected to the router via two interfaces : eth1 and wlan0 3. All users are assigned private IP

Hi, I had a nice router which was able to split my outgoing webtraffic over a dsl line, then I got a power failure and now my settings are lost and I don''t get it to run. I''ve configured a iptable rule like: /sbin/iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth1 -s 192.168.1.10 -p TCP --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 1 and ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup 10 ip route add default via

Hi, not sure if it will work, i''ve 2 leased lines, behind line 1 is a webserver, this server should answer all incomming http requests through leased line 1, the webserver self parses other webserver, this outbound traffic should go over leased line 2. i''ve successfully added fwmark with iproute, but if i set the policy for the webserver to use leased line 2 (for parsing other