similar to: [Bug 52] masquerading not working with iproute2

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52 Summary: masquerading not working with iproute2 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org

hi all, we were trying to configure our system with 2 ethernet catds connected to two different providers using iproute2 so that it recieves and transmits data from both of them. We have followed the configuration as given on lartc''s howto But the most wierd part of the story is that after we restart the system (We have put the script in rc.local) the system works fine and we can ping

Now that 2.6.9 is final. Here is an update of the iproute2 utilities that contains all the patches in my queue. * lnstat to replace rtstat and ctstat (from Harald Welte) * latest xfrm related changes * several small typo''s and build fixes for older systems http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.9-041019.tar.gz

Hi all! I try to make port based routing, because a have two connections to the internet. My router is a "one disk floppy router for linux". It is a big router project www.fli4l.de. I try also to make a opt, it is like a plugin for this router. This project uses Kernel 2.2.19 compiled with libc5 (because it is small and you can use one floppy disk). At the moment, iproute2 is not

Hi. I have Fedora core 1 (kernel 2.4.22) and I downloaded http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.7-ss040608.tar.gz Before upgrading, tc -V shows "iproute2-ss020116", and after shows the same. I had a lot of errors during install (make and make install). Is this lastest version for kernel 2.4? How can I upgrade?? Thanks a lot. Leandro

hi list, i got a small problem. here is my setup: WAN | | | bridged $FW-------DMZ | | masqueraded | LOCAL my shorewall machine ($FW) got three interfaces: eth0 eth1 eth2 * eth0 is connected to the WAN * eth1 is connected to my DMZ * eth2 is connected to LOCAL network i manage a whole C class (public adresses) in my DMZ, let''s say X.Y.Z.0/24 * my router

I''m using Debian (sarge) I do now have 2 ISP, one DSL and one cabel. I want to use the DSL as my primary and only use the cabel-modem if the DSL fails. The setup is: IP1 -> Router -> NAT_IP1 -> eth0 -> eth2 (LAN) IP2 -> Cable-Modem -> eth1 -> eth2 (LAN) I wrote the following in my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables ip rule add from NAT_IP1 lookup 1 ip route add

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=318 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-07-01 22:40 MET ------- Brian - have you been able to test this on a more recent kernel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=318 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-01-28 17:29 MET ------- Please execute"echo 255 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_log_invalid" after loading ipt_LOG and post the results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this

Sorry I wasn''t paying attention to this thread, but am about to try it myself and think I might know what is the problem if you haven''t fixed it yet... > try replacing eth0 with ''xenintbr'', shouldn''t need forwarding enabled > though? Is this a situation where you have eth0 configured non-bridged, > and forwarding to a dummy bridge which in

Hi all, i have a problem i have this topology 192.168.1.7 GW 192.168.2.252 link 1 ------------------------------------ link 2 | | eth1 PROXY eth0 192.168.1.245 192.168.2.245 The default gw of the PROXY is 192.168.1.7 and the link2 is a Secondary link that i need to go out to internet!!!! My internal IP of the network is

I am trying to build a firewall and from my reading of the list archives and other places, I''m worried about unintended interactions between iptables and iproute2. Here is my situation I have an internal network on eth0 and two separate dmzs on eth1 and eth2 respectively (a wireless network and a kiosk). On the outbound side, I have a cablemodem provider and a dsl provider. What I

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=503 siqhamo@newlunar.co.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are

Hi all. I have a NAT problem. I have read FAQs and a lot of masquerading docs, but this seems such a simple problem, that I guess noone else will consider this a problem... This is my setup: shorewall version 1.4.6.c uname -a Linux server 2.4.21-0.13mdksecure #1 SMP [root@server shorewall]# ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 ------- Additional Comments From tobias@portfolio16.de 2003-04-21 23:51 ------- Hi, I think I just found a problem with the patch... It was my fault to use a automatic build system and not check it... In the end the patch didn't apply in its whole and I didn't discover it, because the build system just went on.

Hi, I have a linux box which balances load between two interfaces ( say WAN1 and WAN2). I have masquerading on for any request coming from LAN to the outside world. The setup is in such a way that WAN1 drops packets with source ip belonging to WAN2''s network and viceversa. For some strange reason, I find that packet coming out from the WAN interface has source address of WAN2 and

Hi, I am new in LARTC list. I had intermediate skills in networking. What I tried to do: Use 2 links with loadsharing + falt toletant (to add bandwitdh) ok ! I am use Debian Etch in router/fw With kernel debian default + routes-2.6.17-12.diff patch The Problem: The iproute2 just route thought the last gateway of nexthop rule. I was running tcpdump in 2 terminals, tcpdump -nni eth0 ...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-16 09:36 ------- you seem to be running a

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690 Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |kadlec at netfilter.org Resolution|