similar to: [Bug 47] conntrack breaks nfs, corrupted packets

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From dg@ezcom.de 2003-06-30 16:17 ------- today i replaced my 8139too with a 3c59x and the corruptions are gone ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-05-14 02:39 ------- I've captured some non-fragmented tcp packets which show this behaviour with 2.4.21-rc2. They look badly damaged. The destination ip doesn't match the mac but they come from valid connections. Setting interface mtu to 1486 helps which makes me

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-03-16 09:36 ------- you seem to be running a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2003-06-16 00:38 ------- problem seems to be a dropped reference in remove_expectations, can be reproduced by unloading ip_conntrack after unloading a helper which is helping a connection. Attached patch fixes my problems. ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610 Summary: conntrack doesn't work Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: urykhy at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 09:02 ------- This is a really hard

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48 ------- Additional Comments From tatonet@tiscali.it 2004-02-25 15:05 ------- I know that this is an old bug report, but it's still opened... If we save the size of each single fragment we have to face another problem: how should we re-fragment the packet if original fragments were partially or totally overlapped?

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ip_conntrack |nf_conntrack ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-14 09:05 MET ------- ipv6 conntrack is

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-14 08:39 ------- what patches from patch-o-matic do you use? Do you know how to reproduce this behaviour? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=508 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2006-09-14 13:18 MET ------- Did you enable nf_conntrack and the ipv6 connection tracking module? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=447 Bug 447 depends on bug 440, which changed state. Bug 440 Summary: Space in filename causes Forged DCC command from x.x.x.x: 0.0.0.0:0 https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=440 What |Old Value |New Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 mschwendt@users.sf.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From mschwendt@users.sf.net

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64 ------- Additional Comments From tobias@portfolio16.de 2003-04-21 23:51 ------- Hi, I think I just found a problem with the patch... It was my fault to use a automatic build system and not check it... In the end the patch didn't apply in its whole and I didn't discover it, because the build system just went on.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |2 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612 Summary: conntrack returns src, dst, dport and sport all zeroed Product: libnfnetlink Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: libnfnetlink AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=517 ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2006-09-26 03:44 MET ------- *** Bug 519 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=508 Summary: ip6tables conntrack marks all incoming packets as INVALID Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com ------- Additional Comments From netfilter@linuxace.com 2005-02-24 02:10 MET ------- Any recent

Hello, Due to a recent change in the bridge code, we now need a way of knowing if a packet has been defragmented. The bridge code now checks on the packet size and drops packets that are too big for the output port. Defragmented packets will get refragmented later, so they shouldn't be dropped. I've been reading the defragmentation code and can't find an easy way of knowing if a