similar to: [Bug 39] New: can't execute 'make modules'

Hi All, I am adding ip_queue module for snort inline IDS. I am using snort2.4.0 And iptables-1.3.4. Userspace Queuing(queue target) is enabled. It is built-in and not built as a module. The output of /proc/net/ip_queue is shown below: cat /proc/net/ip_queue> Peer PID : 0 Copy mode : 0 Copy range : 0 Queue length : 0 Queue max. length : 1024 IPTABLES 1.3.4 is

Hello , I am trying to compile ctdb. I pull latest version 2-Jun-2009. During make it fails with error: Compiling utils/ipmux/ipmux.c In file included from /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_queue.h:10, from /usr/include/libipq.h:37, from utils/ipmux/ipmux.c:31: /usr/include/linux/if.h:59: error: redefinition of `struct ifmap' /usr/include/linux/if.h:77:

Hi there, I''m not subscribed to this list so please cc: replies to me... I use Shorewall on all my wireless router PCs, and am also starting to use it on the Linksys WRT54G wireless router (running OpenWRT firmware). I would like to know if Frottle will work with Shorewall (any version). Frottle (http://frottle.sourceforge.net/) is a wireless QoS application that mitigates the

I want to use snort inline for ips and imq for bandwidth shaping When i have inserted imq module ip_queue module insertion giving error Is it possible to use both at the same time -- Failure seldom stops you. What stops you is the fear of failure. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

I am asking this on behalf of the HIPL developers; http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl They have been working on getting their code consistant to the new libnetfilter architecture. Finally have Fedora 18 and 19 available, but have hit a stumbling block with Centos 6. They tell me they are not finding libnetfilter_queue. Here is their message to me: On 08/08/2013 02:03 PM,

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752 Summary: ipq_read() will return an error (rc = -1) and the error message says "Received truncated message" Product: iptables Version: 1.3.5 Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P1

Hi. Does anyone know if it is possible to use ip_queue and IMQ at the same time - if I modprobe one then the other will fail to modprobe with init_module: Device or resource busy TIA Andy. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=495 Summary: Netfilter Connection Tracking Race Condition in Kernel 2.4.x Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack

hi all, i want to try htb3 with imq downloaded & patched imq & htb3 with kernel-2.4.18 on rh7.2 but got STUCK on step 1 :( this are what i did can anyone guide me what went wrong on the first step itself !! [root@cab1 root]# modprobe imq numdevs=1 modprobe: Can''t locate module imq [root@cab1 root]# [root@cab1 root]# tc qdisc add dev imq0 handle 1: root htb default 1 Cannot find

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=988 Bug ID: 988 Summary: manpage: mention that REJECT should be used with care Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

I made an atempt to run snort_inline and shorewall on the same system but I could not get snort to see the packets. Maybe someone with a little more iptables knowledge could tell me what I''m doing wrong or if its possible to have the systems setup so that it places packets that the firewall would allow into QUEUE. After setting up and starting shorewall I then issue the following

Hi, I''m trying to configure IMQ to work on the same machine with frottle (http://frottle.sourceforge.net). The problem is both feed themselves packets through netfilter queueing mechanism, but currently there can only be one netfilter queue per protocol family. To explain why I need IMQ in the first place I have to explain what frottle does. It is a deamon that tweaks the behaviour of a

Question to the list, Has anyone here had experience using Shorewall (multi-isp configuration) with Snort inline? First, is this possible? Second, if anyone has done this, what documentation, if any did they use to set it up? Third, does snort have to run inline on a firewall (I''m under the impression it does)?

Hi everybody, it is my first message here. I tried to browse throughout older posts but I found no immediate answer. I need to change rate of a tbf queue while ip packets are already enqueued by it. If I go: tc qdisc replace|change|link dev eth0 root tbf rate 180kbit burst 1540 limit 15400 as results all enqueued packets seems to disappear. I can see that from a: tc -s qdisc ls dev eth0

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-03 16:32 ------- *** Bug 38 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

--7ZAtKRhVyVSsbBD2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Netfilter Core Team Security Advisory =20 CVE: CAN-2003-0467 Subject: Netfilter / NAT Remote DoS Released: 01 Aug 2003 Effects: Under limited circumstances, a remote user may be able to crash

Hi there I am using IAX2 softphones dialing into meetme conferences. I also have jitterbuffer=yes, with typical jitterbuffer settings. The problem I am having is that as soon as there is a delay from a participant, then the delay continues until the participant hangs up and dials in again. When dialing in again the delay seems to go. It seems to me as though as soon as the server registers

Hello, You will find in attachment the layout of my current physical configuration. For now, the Cable ISP is not used. Since it is a dynamic ISP, my mailserver is rejected and my domain name registers on blacklists like ORDB and al. I want it to be used as a default gateway except for my mail server that would be seen as coming from my "honest" ADSL ISP. Here is