Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v3] virtio_blk: unlock vblk->lock during kick"
2012 Jul 28
1
[PATCH V4 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, Jens & Rusty
This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with
Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and
writethrough' patch.
Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up
patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a
user.
Jens, could you please
2012 Jul 28
1
[PATCH V4 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, Jens & Rusty
This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with
Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and
writethrough' patch.
Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up
patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a
user.
Jens, could you please
2012 Aug 08
2
[PATCH V7 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
Changes in v7:
- Using vbr->flags to trace request type
- Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter
- Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function
- Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
2012 Aug 08
2
[PATCH V7 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
Changes in v7:
- Using vbr->flags to trace request type
- Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter
- Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function
- Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
2017 Oct 10
2
small files performance
2017-10-10 8:25 GMT+02:00 Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com>:
> Hi Gandalf,
>
> We have multiple tuning to do for small-files which decrease the time for
> negative lookups , meta-data caching, parallel readdir. Bumping the server
> and client event threads will help you out in increasing the small file
> performance.
>
> gluster v set <vol-name> group
2012 Jul 13
5
[PATCH V3 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
2) Fusion IO device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
2012 Jul 13
5
[PATCH V3 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
2) Fusion IO device
With bio-based IO path, sequential
2012 Aug 07
4
[PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by
Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%,
2012 Aug 07
4
[PATCH V6 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi, all
This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by
Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk device
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16%
Latency improvement: 32%,
2012 Aug 02
9
[PATCH V5 0/4] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi folks,
This version added REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and
rebased against latest linus's tree.
Jens, could you please consider picking up the dependencies 1/4 and 2/4 in your
tree. Thanks!
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk
2012 Aug 02
9
[PATCH V5 0/4] Improve virtio-blk performance
Hi folks,
This version added REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and
rebased against latest linus's tree.
Jens, could you please consider picking up the dependencies 1/4 and 2/4 in your
tree. Thanks!
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement:
1) Ramdisk
2017 Oct 10
0
small files performance
I just tried setting:
performance.parallel-readdir on
features.cache-invalidation on
features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
performance.stat-prefetch
performance.cache-invalidation
performance.md-cache-timeout 600
network.inode-lru-limit 50000
performance.cache-invalidation on
and clients could not see their files with ls when accessing via a fuse
mount. The files and directories were there,
2012 Jun 13
4
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (2):
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++
2012 Jun 13
4
[PATCH RFC 0/2] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (2):
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++
2012 Jun 18
13
[PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (3):
block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
2012 Jun 18
13
[PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve
performance.
Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16%
latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively.
Asias He (3):
block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper
block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper
virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
2012 Aug 10
1
virtio-scsi <-> vhost multi lun/adapter performance results with 3.6-rc0
Hi folks,
The following are initial virtio-scsi + target vhost benchmark results
using multiple target LUNs per vhost and multiple virtio PCI adapters to
scale the total number of virtio-scsi LUNs into a single KVM guest.
The test setup is currently using 4x SCSI LUNs per vhost WWPN, with 8x
virtio PCI adapters for a total of 32x 500MB ramdisk LUNs into a single
guest, along with each backend
2012 Aug 10
1
virtio-scsi <-> vhost multi lun/adapter performance results with 3.6-rc0
Hi folks,
The following are initial virtio-scsi + target vhost benchmark results
using multiple target LUNs per vhost and multiple virtio PCI adapters to
scale the total number of virtio-scsi LUNs into a single KVM guest.
The test setup is currently using 4x SCSI LUNs per vhost WWPN, with 8x
virtio PCI adapters for a total of 32x 500MB ramdisk LUNs into a single
guest, along with each backend
2018 Mar 20
0
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
Excellent description, thank you.
With performance.write-behind-trickling-writes ON (default):
## 4k randwrite
# fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=32 --size=256MB --readwrite=randwrite
test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32
fio-3.1
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1
2018 Mar 20
2
Gluster very poor performance when copying small files (1x (2+1) = 3, SSD)
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net>
wrote:
> Hi Raghavendra,
>
>
> On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes
> has been merged on master:
> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364
>
>