similar to: [net-next RFC PATCH 0/5] Series short description

Hello All: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Test Environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes - Two directed connected 82599 Test Summary: - Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR

Hello All: This series is an update version of multiqueue virtio-net driver based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Please review and comments. Test Environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz, 8 cores 2 numa nodes - Two directed connected 82599 Test Summary: - Highlights: huge improvements on TCP_RR

From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:20:51 +0800 > @@ -1283,10 +1314,15 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile, > skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0); > > rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb); > + > #ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS > - local_bh_disable(); > - netif_receive_skb(skb); > - local_bh_enable();

From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:20:51 +0800 > @@ -1283,10 +1314,15 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile, > skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0); > > rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb); > + > #ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS > - local_bh_disable(); > - netif_receive_skb(skb); > - local_bh_enable();

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi all: This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: 1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net 2) Build XDP buff 3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once through msg_control during sendmsg(). 4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed, or build skb based on XDP

Hi all: We do not support XDP batching for TUN since it can only receive one packet a time from vhost_net. This series tries to remove this limitation by: - introduce a TUN specific msg_control that can hold a pointer to an array of XDP buffs - try copy and build XDP buff in vhost_net - store XDP buffs in an array and submit them once for every N packets from vhost_net - since TUN can only

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi all: This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: 1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net 2) Build XDP buff 3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once through msg_control during sendmsg(). 4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed, or build skb based on XDP

Hi all: This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: 1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net 2) Build XDP buff 3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once through msg_control during sendmsg(). 4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed, or build skb based on XDP

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

commit 3d0ad09412ffe00c9afa201d01effdb6023d09b4 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> Date: Thu Oct 30 18:27:12 2014 +0000 drivers/net: Disable UFO through virtio Turned off UFO support to virtio-net based devices due to issues with IPv6 fragment id generation for UFO packets. The issue was that IPv6 UFO/GSO implementation expects the fragment id to be supplied in

commit 3d0ad09412ffe00c9afa201d01effdb6023d09b4 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> Date: Thu Oct 30 18:27:12 2014 +0000 drivers/net: Disable UFO through virtio Turned off UFO support to virtio-net based devices due to issues with IPv6 fragment id generation for UFO packets. The issue was that IPv6 UFO/GSO implementation expects the fragment id to be supplied in

The virtio net protocol supports UFO but does not provide for passing a fragment ID for fragmentation of IPv6 packets. We used to generate a fragment ID wherever such a packet was fragmented, but currently we always use ID=0! Ben. Ben Hutchings (2): drivers/net: Disable UFO through virtio drivers/net,ipv6: Select IPv6 fragment idents for virtio UFO packets drivers/net/macvtap.c | 16

The virtio net protocol supports UFO but does not provide for passing a fragment ID for fragmentation of IPv6 packets. We used to generate a fragment ID wherever such a packet was fragmented, but currently we always use ID=0! Ben. Ben Hutchings (2): drivers/net: Disable UFO through virtio drivers/net,ipv6: Select IPv6 fragment idents for virtio UFO packets drivers/net/macvtap.c | 16