similar to: [PULL] virtio

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:53 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Existing PowerPC remaps PIO to MMAP so it works fine today. > > Future platforms may not do this but future platforms can use a > different device. They certainly won't be able to use the existing > drivers anyway. > > Ben, am I wrong here? Well, we do remap PIO, though it's ugly and annoying so we'd

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:53 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Existing PowerPC remaps PIO to MMAP so it works fine today. > > Future platforms may not do this but future platforms can use a > different device. They certainly won't be able to use the existing > drivers anyway. > > Ben, am I wrong here? Well, we do remap PIO, though it's ugly and annoying so we'd

When running on PowerPC, we don''t have native PIO support. There are a few hacks around to enable PIO access on PowerPC nevertheless. The most typical one is the isa-mmio device. It takes MMIO requests and converts them to PIO requests on the (QEMU internal) PIO bus. This however is not how real hardware works and it limits us in the ability to spawn eventfd''s on PIO ports

On 08/05/15 12:49, Mario Pio Russo wrote: > Hi all > > just going back to this, Steve can you please expalin where did you take > this number from? 11644473600 > > that seems not to work correctly on my system so I was lookin g how to > tailor down the right value > > thanks > > >

OK we talked about this a while ago, here's a summary and some proposals: At the moment, virtio PCI uses IO BARs for all accesses. The reason for IO use is the cost of different VM exit types of transactions and their emulation on KVM on x86 (it would be trivial to use memory BARs on non x86 platforms if they don't have PIO). Example benchmark (cycles per transaction): (io access) outw

OK we talked about this a while ago, here's a summary and some proposals: At the moment, virtio PCI uses IO BARs for all accesses. The reason for IO use is the cost of different VM exit types of transactions and their emulation on KVM on x86 (it would be trivial to use memory BARs on non x86 platforms if they don't have PIO). Example benchmark (cycles per transaction): (io access) outw

great thanks Steve ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin, Phone & FAX: +353 1 815 2236, eMail: mariopiorusso at ie.ibm.com IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited registered in Ireland with number 92815. Registered Office: IBM House, Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 (Embedded

On 6/4/2015 9:57 AM, Mario Pio Russo wrote: > guys sorry to take this thread onboard once more, but I still can't get > this sorted. > > I have compiled the latest tarball from samba, 4.2.2 . compilation works > fine and after that I am able to upgrade from samba 3 with the following > command: > > samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir=/var/lib/samba-ccdc1/dbdir/

Thanks Sven, good Idea let's see if i am getting this right: 1) use MS ADSI editor to add few more attributes to the "users" class 2) use ldapmodify from my ubuntu server to populate those attributes would that work? ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin, Phone & FAX:

Cool, I'll have a look at this too, thanks All! ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin, Phone & FAX: +353 1 815 2236, eMail: mariopiorusso at ie.ibm.com IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited registered in Ireland with number 92815. Registered Office: IBM House, Shelbourne Road,

> PDC20265: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:11.0 > PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 0000:00:11.0 > PDC20265: chipset revision 2 > PDC20265: 100% native mode on irq 10 > PDC20265: (U)DMA Burst Bit ENABLED Primary PCI Mode Secondary > PCI Mode. > ide2: BM-DMA at 0x8000-0x8007, BIOS settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio > ide3: BM-DMA at 0x8008-0x800f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio,

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:57:16PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:46:15AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:57:16PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 10:46:15AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >

Thanks Kelvin I'm a bit confised tho, is this patch already avaiable? if yes, what is the parameter that disable ssl into the smb.conf? Maybe the guys from Enterprise samba have already included the patch into their releases so it's just a maatter of enabling the flag. I'm using sernet-samba-4.2.2 Thanks!

On 15/07/15 15:10, Mario Pio Russo wrote: > OR > > is there any way, or magical hidden parmeter in the smb.conf that allows to > enumerate the users in the Domain Users? tbh this has a huge impact on the > file share server as many directorys have "domain users" as group I don't think you understand this at all :-) If a user is a member of an AD domain, then they are

On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:53 AM, Martin J. O'Riordan <Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com> wrote: > I am migrating the llvm/clang derived compiler for our processor from the > v3.1 to v3.2 codebase. This has mostly gone well except that instruction > latency scheduling is no longer happening. > > The people who implemented this previously sub-classed 'ScheduleDAGInstrs'

sorry guys , I think I didn't explain well. basically I have a samba 4 domain (created by upgrading+migrating a samba 3 PDC). For every new user that we add to this domain I need to save some additional info which are very specific for our company/department, but the problem is that I cannot create custom attributes into the Samba4 ldap back-end. For this reason I was thinking to use some

ok, what do you suggest then? maybe changing the authentication to another group like "domainusers" ? ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Mario Pio Russo, System Admin SWG IT Services Dublin, Phone & FAX: +353 1 815 2236, eMail: mariopiorusso at ie.ibm.com IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited registered in Ireland with

hi, latest changes in dev/ata broke this, on older -stable ... ata0-master: pio=PIO4 wdma=UNSUPPORTED udma=UNSUPPORTED cable=40 wire ad0: success setting PIO4 on National chip ad0: 977MB <SanDisk SDCFB-1024 Rev 0.00> at ata0-master PIO4 on latest -stable: ata0-master: pio=PIO4 wdma=WDMA2 udma=UNSUPPORTED cable=40 wire and no disk. cheers, danny

In data lunedì 29 giugno 2015 02:36:57, Chen, Hanxiao ha scritto: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: libguestfs-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:libguestfs-bounces@redhat.com] On > > Behalf Of Pino Toscano > > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 8:12 PM > > To: libguestfs@redhat.com > > Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH v3.1 1/9] uuid: add support to change uuid of