similar to: [PATCH] arch/tile: add /proc/tile, /proc/sys/tile, and a sysfs cpu attribute

Dear R People: Is there an "R equivalent" command for selecting the Tile Vertically option from the Windows toolbar, please? Thanks, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: erinm.hodgess at gmail.com

> > Hi Jiong, >> >> did you receive a full review by an LLVM committer who approved the >> full patch set (not just individual ones) with some kind of "Looks >> good to me"? This is the requirement Chris put for inclusion and only >> after this has happened (and there are no major concerns found during >> review) you should commit the back end.

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at huawei.com> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at huawei.com> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call

From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu at huawei.com> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one interrupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call

Hi all, I'm trying to print a number of wireframe plots (generated using the lattice package), and I want them to appear in a two-by two matrix along with some other (standard) plots. In other words I am trying to create a subplot or tiled plot that works for wireframes. I've tried the methods discussed in: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/help/07/07/21238.html but while they work

On 03/23/2013 10:51 AM, Jiong Wang wrote: > on 2013/3/23 1:52, Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> could you please comment on committing TILE-Gx backend into community? >> Hi Jiong, >> >> I don't have any special advice here. It sounds like the

Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one intterupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at

Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one intterupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at

Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one intterupt is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at

于 2013/3/24 0:07, Joerg Sonnenberger 写道: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:59:49PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> With Chris's reply you also got the general OK to upstream the >> patch, _AFTER_ the actual patches have been reviewed. > One thing I was asking on IRC for is whether it makes sense for new > backends to be committable in incremental steps. Especially for a >

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com> wrote: > 于 2013/3/24 0:07, Joerg Sonnenberger 写道: > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:59:49PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> >>> With Chris's reply you also got the general OK to upstream the >>> patch, _AFTER_ the actual patches have been reviewed. >>> >> One thing I was

于 2013/3/23 23:14, Tobias Grosser 写道: > On 03/23/2013 10:51 AM, Jiong Wang wrote: >> on 2013/3/23 1:52, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Chris, >>>> >>>> could you please comment on committing TILE-Gx backend into community? >>> Hi Jiong,

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 04:59:49PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > With Chris's reply you also got the general OK to upstream the > patch, _AFTER_ the actual patches have been reviewed. One thing I was asking on IRC for is whether it makes sense for new backends to be committable in incremental steps. Especially for a complete backend like this, e.g. the asm parser would make a

Author: duvander Date: Sun May 31 17:34:27 2009 New Revision: 12 Modified: trunk/source/mxn.cloudmade.core.js Log: Implemented most Cloudmade functions. Still requires image, tile and KML/GeoRSS overlays Modified: trunk/source/mxn.cloudmade.core.js ============================================================================== --- trunk/source/mxn.cloudmade.core.js (original) +++

On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > could you please comment on committing TILE-Gx backend into community? Hi Jiong, I don't have any special advice here. It sounds like the general functionality level is high enough. Taking it into mainline sounds great, so long as it is reviewed by someone. -Chris > > >

on 2013/3/23 1:52, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Jiong Wang <jiwang at tilera.com> wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> could you please comment on committing TILE-Gx backend into community? > Hi Jiong, > > I don't have any special advice here. It sounds like the general functionality level is high enough. Taking it into mainline sounds

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16978 Summary: "tile offscreen pixmaps" causing graphics corruption on NV50? Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

Hi Chris, could you please comment on committing TILE-Gx backend into community? ========== TILE-Gx Status =========== Features Supported === 1. general function. 2. PIC/TLS/JumpTable. 3. Instructoin Bundling for VLIW. 4. Asm Parser 5. MC Layer (aware of instruction bundle), MCJIT support. 6. Initial regression tests for CodeGen & MC Layer. Regression Result === Expected Passes : 13363

ngoonee wrote: > > vitamin wrote: > > > > ngoonee wrote: > > > Well, why does my WM know about other wine apps but not e-sword? > > > > Popup, tooltip, and like windows (most windows without caption) are created as unmanaged. It all depends on what kind of windows program is using. > > > I don't think e-sword is an unmanaged window. It has a