similar to: [PATCH RFC] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself

Changes from v2: added padding between avail idx and flags, and changed virtio to only publish used index when callbacks are enabled. Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout. I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi. Posting for early flames/comments. Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring

Changes from v2: added padding between avail idx and flags, and changed virtio to only publish used index when callbacks are enabled. Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout. I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi. Posting for early flames/comments. Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring

kvm (and lguest!) want to get more speed out of the tun device. We already have an ABI for guest<->host comms, called virtio_ring; extending tun to understand this (with its async nature and batching) make for an efficient network. But moreover: the same things that make virtio a good guest<->host transport make it appealing as a userspace<->kernel transport. So rather

kvm (and lguest!) want to get more speed out of the tun device. We already have an ABI for guest<->host comms, called virtio_ring; extending tun to understand this (with its async nature and batching) make for an efficient network. But moreover: the same things that make virtio a good guest<->host transport make it appealing as a userspace<->kernel transport. So rather

Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout. I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi. Posting for early flames/comments. Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where Guest is up to in consuming the ring. However, to completely understand what's going on from the

Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout. I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi. Posting for early flames/comments. Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where Guest is up to in consuming the ring. However, to completely understand what's going on from the

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. TODO: - Refinements and bug fixes; - Split into small patches; - Test indirect descriptor support; - Test/fix event

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. TODO: - Refinements and bug fixes; - Split into small patches; - Test indirect descriptor support; - Test/fix event

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff

On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >

On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some simple functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/12 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected (with EVENT_IDX disabled). But there are below known issues: 1. Reloading the guest driver will break the Tx/Rx; 2. Zeroing the flags when

Hello everyone, This patch set implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/3/33 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected. RFC (v6) -> v1: - Avoid extra virtio_wmb() in virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed_packed() when event idx is off (Jason); - Fix bufs calculation in

Hello everyone, This RFC implements a subset of packed ring which is described at https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-docs/blob/master/virtio-v1.1-packed-wd08.pdf The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. It's not a complete

Hello everyone, This patch set implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/3/33 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected. v1 -> v2: - Use READ_ONCE() to read event off_wrap and flags together (Jason); - Add comments related to ccw (Jason); RFC (v6) -> v1: -

Hello everyone, This patch set implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/3/33 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected. v1 -> v2: - Use READ_ONCE() to read event off_wrap and flags together (Jason); - Add comments related to ccw (Jason); RFC (v6) -> v1: -

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost (RFC v5): https://lwn.net/Articles/755862/ Both of ping and netperf worked as expected. TODO: - Refinements (for code and commit log); - More tests and bug fixes if any; - Send the formal patch set; RFC v5 -> RFC v6: - Avoid

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some simple functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/12 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected (with EVENT_IDX disabled). TODO: - Refinements (for code and commit log); - More tests; - Bug fixes; RFC v3 -> RFC v4: - Make ID allocation

This adds wrappers to switch between native endian-ness (virtio 0.9) and virtio endian-ness (virtio 1.0). Add new typedefs as well, so that we can check statically that we didn't miss any accesses. All callers simply pass in false (0.9) so no functional change for now. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Sending this early so I can get feedback on this style.