similar to: [PATCH] vhost: access check thinko fixes

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] vhost: access check thinko fixes"

2016 Mar 25
0
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future device IOTLB conversion: 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect several regions with different size. 3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU To
2016 Jan 19
0
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:42:29 +0800 Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future > device IOTLB conversion: > > 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's > expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. > 2) need extra work of removing a large range
2016 Apr 27
1
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:34:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future > device IOTLB conversion: > > 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's > expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. > 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect >
2016 Apr 27
1
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:34:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future > device IOTLB conversion: > > 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's > expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. > 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect >
2009 Dec 20
0
[PATCH 2/3] vhost: add access_ok checks
On biarch kernels, it is not safe to do copy from/to user, even with use_mm, unless we checked the address range with access_ok previously. Implement these checks to enforce safe memory accesses. Reported-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 17 ++++++- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 111
2009 Dec 20
0
[PATCH 2/3] vhost: add access_ok checks
On biarch kernels, it is not safe to do copy from/to user, even with use_mm, unless we checked the address range with access_ok previously. Implement these checks to enforce safe memory accesses. Reported-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 17 ++++++- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 111
2016 Jan 18
2
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future device IOTLB conversion: 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect several regions with different size. 3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU To
2016 Jan 18
2
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future device IOTLB conversion: 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation. 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect several regions with different size. 3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU To
2018 Apr 10
0
[PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions
Currently vhost *_access_ok() functions return int. This is error-prone because there are two popular conventions: 1. 0 means failure, 1 means success 2. -errno means failure, 0 means success Although vhost mostly uses #1, it does not do so consistently. umem_access_ok() uses #2. This patch changes the return type from int to bool so that false means failure and true means success. This
2018 Apr 11
0
[PATCH v3 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions
Currently vhost *_access_ok() functions return int. This is error-prone because there are two popular conventions: 1. 0 means failure, 1 means success 2. -errno means failure, 0 means success Although vhost mostly uses #1, it does not do so consistently. umem_access_ok() uses #2. This patch changes the return type from int to bool so that false means failure and true means success. This
2014 Jun 05
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need for RCU here anymore. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Note: this is on top of my last pull request drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++-------- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++----- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- drivers/vhost/test.c | 9
2014 Jun 05
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need for RCU here anymore. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- Note: this is on top of my last pull request drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++-------- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++----- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- drivers/vhost/test.c | 9
2014 Jun 05
2
[PATCH 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need for RCU here anymore. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- This is on top of the recent pull request that I sent. drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++-------- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++----- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2014 Jun 05
2
[PATCH 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need for RCU here anymore. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- This is on top of the recent pull request that I sent. drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++-------- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++----- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2010 Oct 11
2
[patch 1/2] vhost: potential integer overflows
I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed to access_ok() and here are the results. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num, struct
2010 Oct 11
2
[patch 1/2] vhost: potential integer overflows
I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed to access_ok() and here are the results. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num, struct
2020 Feb 20
0
[PATCH V3 1/5] vhost: factor out IOTLB
This patch factors out IOTLB into a dedicated module in order to be reused by other modules like vringh. User may choose to enable the automatic retiring by specifying VHOST_IOTLB_FLAG_RETIRE flag to fit for the case of vhost device IOTLB implementation. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 7 ++
2019 Mar 06
0
[RFC PATCH V2 4/5] vhost: introduce helpers to get the size of metadata area
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c index 2025543..1015464 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c @@ -413,6 +413,27 @@ static void vhost_dev_free_iovecs(struct
2010 Apr 13
1
[PATCH] vhost-net: fix vq_memory_access_ok error checking
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > vq_memory_access_ok needs to check whether mem == NULL > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike at linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> This was already queued by me, you do not need to fill Dave's inbox with vhost patches. > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 ++++ >
2010 Apr 13
1
[PATCH] vhost-net: fix vq_memory_access_ok error checking
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > vq_memory_access_ok needs to check whether mem == NULL > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike at linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> This was already queued by me, you do not need to fill Dave's inbox with vhost patches. > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 ++++ >