Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] vhost: access check thinko fixes"
2016 Mar 25
0
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future
device IOTLB conversion:
1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's
expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation.
2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect
several regions with different size.
3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU
To
2016 Jan 19
0
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:42:29 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future
> device IOTLB conversion:
>
> 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's
> expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation.
> 2) need extra work of removing a large range
2016 Apr 27
1
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:34:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future
> device IOTLB conversion:
>
> 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's
> expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation.
> 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect
>
2016 Apr 27
1
[RFC PATCH V2 1/2] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:34:33AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future
> device IOTLB conversion:
>
> 1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's
> expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation.
> 2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect
>
2009 Dec 20
0
[PATCH 2/3] vhost: add access_ok checks
On biarch kernels, it is not safe to do copy from/to user, even with use_mm,
unless we checked the address range with access_ok previously. Implement these
checks to enforce safe memory accesses.
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 17 ++++++-
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 111
2009 Dec 20
0
[PATCH 2/3] vhost: add access_ok checks
On biarch kernels, it is not safe to do copy from/to user, even with use_mm,
unless we checked the address range with access_ok previously. Implement these
checks to enforce safe memory accesses.
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro at zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 17 ++++++-
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 111
2016 Jan 18
2
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future
device IOTLB conversion:
1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's
expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation.
2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect
several regions with different size.
3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU
To
2016 Jan 18
2
[PATCH RFC] vhost: convert pre sorted vhost memory array to interval tree
Current pre-sorted memory region array has some limitations for future
device IOTLB conversion:
1) need extra work for adding and removing a single region, and it's
expected to be slow because of sorting or memory re-allocation.
2) need extra work of removing a large range which may intersect
several regions with different size.
3) need trick for a replacement policy like LRU
To
2018 Apr 10
0
[PATCH v2 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions
Currently vhost *_access_ok() functions return int. This is error-prone
because there are two popular conventions:
1. 0 means failure, 1 means success
2. -errno means failure, 0 means success
Although vhost mostly uses #1, it does not do so consistently.
umem_access_ok() uses #2.
This patch changes the return type from int to bool so that false means
failure and true means success. This
2018 Apr 11
0
[PATCH v3 2/2] vhost: return bool from *_access_ok() functions
Currently vhost *_access_ok() functions return int. This is error-prone
because there are two popular conventions:
1. 0 means failure, 1 means success
2. -errno means failure, 0 means success
Although vhost mostly uses #1, it does not do so consistently.
umem_access_ok() uses #2.
This patch changes the return type from int to bool so that false means
failure and true means success. This
2014 Jun 05
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed
under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need
for RCU here anymore.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
Note: this is on top of my last pull request
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++--------
drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
drivers/vhost/test.c | 9
2014 Jun 05
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed
under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need
for RCU here anymore.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
Note: this is on top of my last pull request
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++--------
drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
drivers/vhost/test.c | 9
2014 Jun 05
2
[PATCH 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed
under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need
for RCU here anymore.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
This is on top of the recent pull request that I sent.
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++--------
drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2014 Jun 05
2
[PATCH 1/2] vhost: move acked_features to VQs
Refactor code to make sure features are only accessed
under VQ mutex. This makes everything simpler, no need
for RCU here anymore.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
This is on top of the recent pull request that I sent.
drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 11 +++--------
drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++-----
drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
2010 Oct 11
2
[patch 1/2] vhost: potential integer overflows
I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed
to access_ok() and here are the results.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
struct
2010 Oct 11
2
[patch 1/2] vhost: potential integer overflows
I did an audit for potential integer overflows of values which get passed
to access_ok() and here are the results.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index dd3d6f7..c2aa12c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
struct
2020 Feb 20
0
[PATCH V3 1/5] vhost: factor out IOTLB
This patch factors out IOTLB into a dedicated module in order to be
reused by other modules like vringh. User may choose to enable the
automatic retiring by specifying VHOST_IOTLB_FLAG_RETIRE flag to fit
for the case of vhost device IOTLB implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 7 ++
2019 Mar 06
0
[RFC PATCH V2 4/5] vhost: introduce helpers to get the size of metadata area
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
---
drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
index 2025543..1015464 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
@@ -413,6 +413,27 @@ static void vhost_dev_free_iovecs(struct
2010 Apr 13
1
[PATCH] vhost-net: fix vq_memory_access_ok error checking
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> vq_memory_access_ok needs to check whether mem == NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
This was already queued by me, you do not need to
fill Dave's inbox with vhost patches.
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 ++++
>
2010 Apr 13
1
[PATCH] vhost-net: fix vq_memory_access_ok error checking
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 09:59:10AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> vq_memory_access_ok needs to check whether mem == NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
This was already queued by me, you do not need to
fill Dave's inbox with vhost patches.
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 4 ++++
>