similar to: [PATCHv5 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[PATCHv5 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server"

2009 Nov 02
0
[PATCHv6 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed your comments so far here. In particular I have added write logging for live migration, indirect buffers and virtio net header (enables gso). I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce
2009 Nov 02
0
[PATCHv6 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed your comments so far here. In particular I have added write logging for live migration, indirect buffers and virtio net header (enables gso). I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce
2009 Nov 03
0
[PATCHv7 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here. In particular I have added write logging for live migration, indirect buffers and virtio net header (enables gso). I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce
2009 Nov 03
0
[PATCHv7 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Rusty, ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here. In particular I have added write logging for live migration, indirect buffers and virtio net header (enables gso). I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce
2009 Nov 09
0
[PATCHv9 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here, and it still seems to work :). Please take a look. I basically ended up accepting all Rusty's suggestions, except I did not get rid of avail_idx field in vq: I don't (yet?) understand what's wrong with it, if any, and it seems required for correct implementation of notify on empty. I tried adding comment where it's changed
2009 Nov 09
0
[PATCHv9 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here, and it still seems to work :). Please take a look. I basically ended up accepting all Rusty's suggestions, except I did not get rid of avail_idx field in vq: I don't (yet?) understand what's wrong with it, if any, and it seems required for correct implementation of notify on empty. I tried adding comment where it's changed
2009 Nov 04
1
[PATCHv8 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here. Rusty, I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this
2009 Nov 04
1
[PATCHv8 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here. Rusty, I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? --- This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this
2009 Aug 13
0
[PATCHv3 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached
2009 Aug 13
0
[PATCHv3 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached
2009 Aug 11
1
[PATCHv2 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached
2009 Aug 11
1
[PATCHv2 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
This implements vhost: a kernel-level backend for virtio, The main motivation for this work is to reduce virtualization overhead for virtio by removing system calls on data path, without guest changes. For virtio-net, this removes up to 4 system calls per packet: vm exit for kick, reentry for kick, iothread wakeup for packet, interrupt injection for packet. Some more detailed description attached
2009 Aug 19
1
[PATCHv4 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Rusty, could you review and comment on the patches please? Since most of the code deals with virtio from host side, I think it will make sense to merge them through your tree. What do you think? One comment on placement: I put files under a separate vhost directory to avoid confusion with virtio-net which runs in guest. Does this sound sane? If not let me know and I'll move them. Thanks!
2009 Aug 19
1
[PATCHv4 0/2] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server
Rusty, could you review and comment on the patches please? Since most of the code deals with virtio from host side, I think it will make sense to merge them through your tree. What do you think? One comment on placement: I put files under a separate vhost directory to avoid confusion with virtio-net which runs in guest. Does this sound sane? If not let me know and I'll move them. Thanks!
2009 Aug 27
1
[PATCHv5 1/3] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules
vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47
2009 Aug 27
1
[PATCHv5 1/3] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules
vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47
2020 Apr 04
0
[PATCH 4/6] kernel: move use_mm/unuse_mm to kthread.c
These helpers are only for use with kernel threads, and I will tie them more into the kthread infrastructure going forward. Also move the prototypes to kthread.h - mmu_context.h was a little weird to start with as it otherwise contains very low-level MM bits. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd.h | 1 +
2009 Aug 13
0
[PATCHv3 1/2] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules
vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47 +---------------------------------- include/linux/mmu_context.h | 9 ++++++
2009 Aug 13
0
[PATCHv3 1/2] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules
vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47 +---------------------------------- include/linux/mmu_context.h | 9 ++++++
2009 Aug 19
0
[PATCHv4 1/2] mm: export use_mm/unuse_mm to modules
vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47