similar to: [ANNOUNCE] xorg-sgml-doctools 1.6

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This package provides a common set of SGML entities and XML/CSS style sheets used in building/formatting the documentation provided in other X.Org packages. It's typically only needed by people building from source who want to produce formatted documentation from their builds, or those who have installed the HTML version of the documentation,

This package provides a common set of SGML entities and XML/CSS style sheets used in building/formatting the documentation provided in other X.Org packages. It's typically only needed by people building from source who want to produce formatted documentation from their builds, or those who have installed the HTML version of the documentation, which refers to the included common xorg.css

Hi all, Sorry, the previous announcements had broken sums for the .tar.gz files; I've pasted the corrected sums here. Thanks Tilman, or else I wouldn't have noticed. http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/app/luit-1.0.2.tar.gz MD5: 1acd244a489bae605a03a84d0754fb00 luit-1.0.2.tar.gz SHA1: 3ea4328256a6576e12fcdac278263d2fef6edf63 luit-1.0.2.tar.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It's a bit after 11pm, on the 11th day of the 11th month of the year, so what better time for a new release of X11! Release Candidate 1 of X11R7.6 has been posted at: http://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.6-RC1/ This includes all the source tar files for the versions of the modules currently considered part of the core release set (aka the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This package provides the X Window System documentation that doesn't belong in a more specific package. It used to provide a lot of docs that did belong in more specific packages, but that has largely been corrected in this release: git diff --shortstat xorg-docs-1.5..xorg-docs-1.5.99.901 155 files changed, 27570 insertions(+), 112431

After upgrading to 8.1.1911, bcc-tools and bpftrace seem to be broken. Current package versions I have: bpftrace-0.9-3.el8.x86_64 and bcc-tools-0.8.0-4.el8.x86_64 Both of these seem to be pulling in LLVM version 7, rather than the version 8 that is in 8.1.1911: [root at localhost ~]# bpftrace bpftrace: error while loading shared libraries: libclangFrontend.so.7: cannot open shared object file:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0540 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0540.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 6107dbc2ecc841048ae183d9fe610c303f21190ceed55a6f477339b65fd85cbf sgml-common-0.6.3-33.el6.noarch.rpm

I have a package that will have an sgml file. One of the demos in ./demo will use it. Where should I put it? I tried putting it in ./demo but it did not survive the build so currently I put it in ./inst and it gets copied to the same level as the DESCRIPTION file and the demo gets it from there. Is that right or is there a better choice? I assume I can't use ./data since its not in the

Dear list, I have some help file for S-Plus 2000 in .d and .sgml format. Is there a way to translate these files to .Rd files to use in an R package? Thanks Fredrik Lundgren

I have help files in several formats. Up until now I have converted nroff files to S-Plus 6 sgml and html files using Splus doc_to_S ... (creates .sgml file) Splus HINSTALL ... (creates .sgm and .html files) I maintain master help files in R .Rd files, and for some of my functions converting from .Rd to .sgm using R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm ... produces better .sgm files than beginning with

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Red Hat, Inc. Red Hat Security Advisory Synopsis: Updated sgml-tools packages fix insecure temporary file handling Advisory ID: RHSA-2001:027-02 Issue date: 2001-03-09 Updated on: 2001-03-14 Product: Red Hat Linux Keywords: sgml-tools /tmp tempfile Cross

Hi: The FreeBSD10-Beta3 kernel is recompiled successfully with the following in /etc/make.conf WITH_NEW_XORG=yes WITH_KMS=yes WITH_GALLIUM=yes But after installworld, there is no sight of new xorg-server-1.12.4 in pkg cache nor in /usr/ports: How to install new xorg and where is the source? # pkg search xorg linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 xorg-7.7 xorg-apps-7.7 xorg-cf-files-1.0.5_1

doc/Makefile.am | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 1 + doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 18 +++++++++++++++++- libswfdec/swfdec_loader.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ libswfdec/swfdec_player.c | 8 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree 00252e7f75acd6466c2ae7c6fc446f4741dab7a1 (from 07b4bd5159998882ec3b665b5a0f8216663d8b43)

Philippe, What's the output with '--allowerasing' switch? We are experiencing a similar issue, dnf update: ... Problem 53: problem with installed package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 - package perl-Encode-devel-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires perl-Encode(x86-64) = 4:2.97-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed - package perl-Encode-4:2.97-3.el8.x86_64 requires

Just as a followup even g++ is broken: [piot at paris ~]$ g++ bash: g++: command not found... Install package 'gcc-c++' to provide command 'g++'? [N/y] y * Waiting in queue... The following packages have to be downgraded: cpp-8.2.1-3.5.el8.x86_64 The C Preprocessor glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.i686 The GNU libc libraries glibc-2.28-42.el8.1.x86_64 The GNU libc libraries

doc/Makefile.am | 12 ++++ doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 4 + doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 13 +++++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 11 +++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_types.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_types.h | 7 +- 6 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree

doc/Makefile.am | 1 doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 2 doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 39 +++++++++++ libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.h | 5 - 5 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree 2203783339a0ece4ce8d264d0ec28c77034c3288 (from

All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for

doc/Makefile.am | 1 doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 1 doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 23 ++++++++ libswfdec/Makefile.am | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec.h | 9 +-- libswfdec/swfdec_as_array.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_boolean.c | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 46

configure.ac | 2 doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 2 libswfdec/js/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_buffer.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++--- libswfdec/swfdec_buffer.h | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_js_movie.c | 292 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- test/trace/Makefile.am | 2 7 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree