Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "[ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.23"
2003 Dec 01
0
[PATCH] 2.4.23 ext3 warning
Kill warning if CONFIG_QUOTA is disabled.
--- linux-2.4.23/fs/ext3/super.c.orig Fri Nov 28 21:04:40 2003
+++ linux-2.4.23/fs/ext3/super.c Sun Nov 30 12:16:00 2003
@@ -449,7 +449,6 @@
}
static struct dquot_operations ext3_qops;
-static int (*old_sync_dquot)(struct dquot *dquot);
static struct super_operations ext3_sops = {
read_inode: ext3_read_inode, /* BKL held */
@@ -1773,6 +1772,8 @@
2003 Dec 15
0
htree in 2.4.23
Hi All,
Is http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/ext3-dxdir/patch-ext3-dxdir-2.4.21rc5
the latest htree patch for 2.4 or should I be using bitkeeper to extract
the patch?
2003 Dec 08
1
tc troubles with pfifo_fast qdisc on 2.4.23 kernel
Hi!
I was updated kernel from 2.4.22 to 2.4.23
and now tc tools can''t correctly determine default (pfifo_fast) qdisc on interface:
# tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp0
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: [Unknown qdisc, optlen=20]
but, if I assign f.e. cbq qdisc for some device all show correctly:
# tc/tc qdisc ls dev ppp1
qdisc tbf 8009: rate 32Kbit burst 10Kb lat 1.5s
qdisc cbq 66: rate 10Mbit
2004 Jan 21
3
FW: DNAT and masq problem with kernel 2.4.23
Hi,
after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8
will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables:
Invalid argument" /
I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is
no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel.
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html
2003 Oct 27
2
EXT3 deadlock in 2.4.22 and 2.4.23-pre7 - quota related?
Hi all, and particularly Andrew and Stephen,
I recently "upgraded' one of my NFS fileservers from (patched)2.4.18
to 2.4.23-pre7 (in order to resolve a HIMEM related memory pressure
problem).
Unfortunately I have experienced what appears to be a deadlock.
The one I will describe was experienced while running 2.4.23-pre7,
though I had a very similar problem in 2.4.22 (but
2003 Nov 30
1
bad performance on 2.4.23
hi,
- big and ugly mail. If you don't like them, delete it now :-) -
I have collected and classified some information of:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
And I observed that ext3 performance is worse than previous
kernels(2.4.19...). -ac and -aa are here only as reference.
Complete information is in the upper URL.
dbench: Performance is worse.
dbench (Numbers are in