similar to: Pointer bug in win32-taskscheduler?

Hi all, Windows 2000 Ruby 1.8.2 R7 VC++ 6.0 I noticed that if I try to call new_work_item and give the task a name that already exists, I get a segfault: C:\eclipse\workspace\win32-taskscheduler>ruby test.rb "0.1.0" test.rb:22:in `new_work_item'': NewWorkItem() function failed (Win32::TaskSchedul erError) from test.rb:22 test.rb:22: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby

I''ve updated taskscheduler.c and taskscheduler.h. The method names are now more Ruby-like (though I have to change a couple yet), and I''ve shortened the constant names, as well as moved the constants over to the .h file. I was thinking we should merge a few of these methods. I think "set_target_computer" and "new_work_item" could both be rolled into the

Hi, This library has needed some work for a while, so I''m finally getting around to it. I''ve made some changes and updates in CVS, so grab the latest source to test the issue below. The first issue I''d like to tackle is why the TaskScheduler#account_information (GetAccountInformation) method fails if there''s no user associated with a given task. The docs

Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Scott Harper <sharperct@gmail.com> Subject: Win32 Utils TaskScheduler Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 17:04:24 -0400 Size: 4971 Url:

Well, I''m going to release the first version of win32-taskscheduler today. For now, I''ve kept the API about the same as it originally was because I was spending way too much time futzing around and I wanted to get something out the door. For now, I''m calling this a BETA release, with the API subject to change. See the ''Future Plans'' section of

Hi all, I think I would like to add the TaskScheduler#active? and TaskScheduler#exists? methods. I''m not sure how they should be implemented however. For TaskScheduler#exists? I suppose I could use the IEnumWorkItems and iterated over the list. Is there a better way? The TaskScheduler#active? would just tell me if a given task has been activated or not, but I''m not sure

Bugs item #3924, was opened at 26/03/2006 22:12 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=3924&group_id=85 Category: win32-taskscheduler Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: David FAROI (dfaroi) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Segmentation fault under Windows Initial Comment: I''m trying to make

Hi all, Thought I should say something - it''s been a little while. :) Anyway, I''m still futzing with how I want the Ruby API to look. The more I look at the Perl version, the more I think it was too faithful to the C API. Right now I''m looking at the trigger() method. For example, I don''t see any reason to make the "type" key take a hash as an

Hi, I was going to modify the TaskScheduler#save method to take an optional file name. But, I need to convert a Ruby string to an OLE string. I thought I could use this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms692615(VS.85).aspx But, it only appears to accept literal string constants. Any other suggestions? Thanks, Dan

For future reference, it looks like we should avoid DONT_RESOLVE_DLL_REFERENCES in any extensions. http://weblogs.asp.net/oldnewthing/archive/2005/02/14/372266.aspx Regards, Dan

hi there, i thing i just have a logical problem. i have following models. class Area < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :taskschedule belongs_to :service end class Service < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :taskschedules, :through => :areas has_many :areas end class Taskschedule < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :services, :through => :areas has_many :areas end Following View

Hi all, I think I''ve narrowed down the problem with win32-file. It appears that EncryptFile() and DecryptFile are only supported on Win2k or later. So, I made some minor modifications to the extconf.rb and source files and released win32-file 0.4.2 tonight. That *should* solve that problem. As for win32-shortcut, I''m not sure why it doesn''t like IID_IPersistFile, or

The Wine development release 1.7.10 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Window maximization in the Mac driver. - AVI compressor implementation. - Thread local storage support in dynamically loaded libraries. - Beginnings of a Task Scheduler implementation. - Extended IPX protocol support. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the

Puppet 2.7.7rc1 is available. This release fixes several issues with Mongrel and Puppet 2.7.x, Windows fixes and updates, test fixes, documentation updates and more. Release Notes for 2.7.7 series -- https://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Release_Notes This release is available for download at: http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/puppet/ See the Verifying Puppet Download section at:

Am 21.07.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Russell R Poyner: > Jeremy, > > I think this is exactly a complex interaction between FreeBSD and > Samba. Best guess would be some system call that is fast in linux but > slow in FreeBSD holding things back. > > Russ > > On 07/21/2016 01:00 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:23:01PM -0500, Russell R Poyner

The Wine development release 1.1.2 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Control panel improvements and new appwiz panel. - Restructurations of state handling in Direct3D. - Support for timer queue functions. - Many MSXML improvements. - Several fixes to Solaris support. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

Puppet 2.7.8rc1 is available. 2.7.8rc1 contains everything that was being previewed in the 2.7.7rc series as well as some new content. Key highlight in this release (beyond items from 2.7.7rc series) are: * Allow providers to be selected in the run they become suitable * Showdiff is now not auto-enabled when running in noop mode * Provide default subjectAltNames while bootstrapping

I''m preety new at RoR (and programming), I tried a few tutorials, and really like the RoR simplicity, but my knowledge of the framework still isn''t very good (to be true, i understand the basics, but not everything that''s in the tutorials). But still I''d like to create a website which has: - front end interface (with no edit functions) - admin interface