Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[Bug 25974] New: Mesa won't compile. Undeclared constants at nv20_context.c."
2010 Feb 02
2
[RFC] Merge of a reincarnation of the nouveau classic mesa driver.
For a long time the gallium pipe drivers for nvidia fixed function cards
(nv0x, nv1x and, to some extent, nv2x) have remained unmaintained and
godforsaken -- especially nv0x and nv1x had seen almost no progress
since their creation.
They've recently grown a classic mesa driver which implements many new
features: texturing, hardware-accelerated tnl. However the killer
feature is "it
2014 Jan 14
0
[PATCH] nouveau: add framebuffer validation callback
Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> writes:
> Fixes assertions when trying to attach textures to fbs with formats not
> supported by the render engines.
>
> See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73459
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
> ---
Hi Ilia,
>
> In a perfect world I'd have separate callbacks for depth and
2014 Jan 10
2
[PATCH] nouveau: add framebuffer validation callback
Fixes assertions when trying to attach textures to fbs with formats not
supported by the render engines.
See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73459
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu>
---
In a perfect world I'd have separate callbacks for depth and color, but given
the list of supported values, I don't think this matters. Also I used
2012 Apr 06
1
[WIP PATCH] dri/nouveau: Add S3TC support for nv20.
---
Hi,
this is still WIP, but already passes piglit's s3tc-teximage, s3tc-texsubimage and fbo-generatemipmap-formats(s3tc tests)
and even Wolfenstein:Enemy-Territory works on my nv25. It's based on Ben's newlib branch. I have few issues though:
1) So far it needs libtxc_dxtn, but I might expose the s3tc extensions even without encoder using driconf option -
Is that desirable?
2)
2010 Jan 18
0
[PATCH] nv04-nv40: Rewrite and unify miptree and transfer code (v2)
Changes:
- Fixed some nv##_miptree that were not converted to nv04_miptree.
- Disable swizzling on non-RGBA 2D textures, since the current 2D
code is mostly broken in those cases. A later patch will fix this.
Thanks to Andrew Randrianasulu who reported this.
This patch rewrites all the miptree layout and transfer code in the
pre-NV50 Gallium drivers.
The code is also unified among them and
2010 Jan 18
0
[PATCH] nv04-nv40: Rewrite and unify miptree and transfer code
This patch rewrites all the miptree layout and transfer code in the
pre-NV50 Gallium drivers.
The code is also unified among them and put in the nv04 directory.
The current code is broken in several ways:
1. 3D textures are laid out first by face, then by level, which is
incorrect
2. Cube maps should have 128-byte aligned faces
3. Swizzled textures have a strange alignment test that seems
2004 Jul 14
1
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
>From: John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu>
>Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:11:03 -0500
>
>
>The DataTypes.h header file is generated by the configure script and placed
>into your build tree. My best guess is that your system's header files do
>not correctly define these macros, so they are missing.
>
I did a search on the build and source trees, but neither
2004 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Personally I think that we've waited much too long for the 1.3 release,
BTW, for those who are interested in the differences between 1.2 and CVS,
check out: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew
Note that the release notes still need to be polished, but you'll get the
basic idea.
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:05:21 -0500 (CDT)
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> BTW, for those who are interested in the differences between 1.2 and CVS,
> check out: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew
It might be a good idea to add a check-in script that puts the latest
version of the pending ReleaseNotes.html into the web site directory and
then link
2004 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:05:21 -0500 (CDT)
> Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>
> > BTW, for those who are interested in the differences between 1.2 and CVS,
> > check out: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#whatsnew
>
> It might be a good idea to add a check-in script that puts the latest
>
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
Silly me. Perhaps then just a more prominent link on the main page with
something like a "what's coming in the next release" label ?
Reid.
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:16:33 -0500 (CDT)
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> That is exactly what the http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ directory is: a
> mirror of the docs directory in CVS. It's autoupdated on every
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared(firstuse this function)
>From: "Reid Spencer" <reid at x10sys.com>
>Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:33:30 -0400
>
>On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT)
> Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>>Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks...
>
>Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on
>CPR? Anything else? We're starting to
2004 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared(firstuse this function)
>From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>
>Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0500 (CDT)
>The file you need to modify is here:
>llvm/include/Support/DataTypes.h.in
>
>There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments
>protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef
>to include internix.
>
Sorry, Chris, but my
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > Another thing that is on my short list for 1.3 is to get as many .bc
> > format changes out of the way as possible so the backwards compat code in
> > the .bc reader is simpler. In particular, I would at least like to get
> > placeholders for PR263 and maybe PR400.
>
> This I strongly agree with. We need to minimize impact
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared(firstuse this function)
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Henrik Bach wrote:
> >There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments
> >protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef
> >to include internix.
> >
>
> Sorry Chris, but my DataTypes.h.in seems to be outdated (due to I'm porting
> LLVM 1.2), so I'm not at the moment able to edit the
2004 Jul 14
1
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (first use this function)
Hi
By manipulating a #define for G++ I've managed to compile int64_t type with
ostream.
Now, I'm stopped by some to me unknown constants:
-----------------------------------
Compiling Constants.cpp
Constants.cpp: In static member function `static bool
llvm::ConstantSInt::isValueValidForType(const llvm::Type*, long long
int)':
Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT)
> Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> > Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks...
>
> Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on CPR?
> Anything else? We're starting to get some traction with more developers and
> I think doing
2004 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT)
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks...
Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on CPR?
Anything else? We're starting to get some traction with more developers and
I think doing a release sooner rather than later might be worth it for all
parties
2004 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:57:20 -0500 (CDT)
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> CPR would be really nice. There is also this ephemeral PPC support that
> may or may not make it, but would be really awesome it if did. I would
> also like to turn on some sort of interprocedural alias analysis by
> default (for performance).
CPR might make it in the next couple of weeks.
2004 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared(firstuse this function)
>From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>
>Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:49:01 -0500 (CDT)
>
>There is currently support for building in non-cygwin windows environments
>protected by _MSC_VER. You just need to broaden the scope of the #ifndef
>to include internix.
>
Sorry Chris, but my DataTypes.h.in seems to be outdated (due to I'm porting
LLVM 1.2), so I'm not