similar to: Dovecot not liking AD config from wiki??

Hi, I'm attempting to implement Dovecot 2.1.3 built on a FreeBSD 8.2 64 bit system from ports. I had the servicve up and running on a local vbox demo which did a very simple Maildir format sytem which was situated in ~/Maildir. I would now like to expand the system and tie it to a Windows domain. What is the best way to go about doing this? Can Dovecot be directly tied in or do I need to

I'm running samba 2.5 on a FreeBSD box using winbind to do authentication with my PDC/BDC. I'm able to configure shares that everyone on the NT network can access but when I configure private shares (only 1 or 2 users have access to) the users get prompted for a username and password and are not allowed access. What am I doing wrong? Below I have included a copy of my smb.conf and pam.conf

I'm setting up a freebsd server which will authenticate against an Active Directory I mean: the server will NOT have any local users (except mandatory and minimum required for management and configuration) and will authenticate requests for login and access FOR EVERY SERVICE against an Active Directory Server I have configured the samba service and currently I can login to local terminal,

Hi, I'm trying to configure a server to use SAMBA and Winbind to authenticate to Active Directory.... I managed to get this portion up and running even the Dovecot portion. For reference something similar to this guide: http://www.whitneytechnologies.com/?p=119 However PAM is slightly different: # cat /etc/pam.d/dovecot auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_user_check validate account

I've built a domain member. It works pretty good with the exception that I want on-the-fly home directories being built. I'm not sure this is doable with a domain member as everything I've tried isn't even called - as far as I can tell. Using log level 3. If anyone can shed light on how to dynamically create home directories, that'd be great. anyway, here's my

> What is in the pam.d/dovecot file? (Remember to strip passwords if > included) # cat /etc/pam.d/dovecot passdb { driver = pam # args = failure_show_msg=yes # args = max_requests=12 args = %s } and /etc/pam.d/{imap,pop3} were untouched; both as follows # # $FreeBSD: releng/10.3/etc/pam.d/pop3 170771 2007-06-15 11:33:13Z yar $ # # PAM configuration for the "pop3" service

>> auth: in openpam_parse_chain(): /etc/pam.d/dovecot(1): missing or invalid facility > > I do not think that it has something to do with the dovecot settings > itself but perhaps with the pam facility settings instead? i can believe that. any clues to debug? randy

Hi, I am currently in the process of setting up an IMAP repository for round 100 users.... Currently the user authentication method is being handled via a Windows Domain Controller. The host OS for Dovecot will either be FreeBSD or CentOS. Would Dovecot be able to authenticate to either the DC directly or would we need to go through LDAP?? Additionally what would be the best method to

Hello to everyone! I've got the latest (20040914) Wine. Everything works fine actually. But I've got this weird thing with Fallout 2. It seems to work but mouse and keyboard does not work. I tried enabling DirectX grab on config file, but it didn't work. It grabs but still the mouse and keyboard does not function. I tried turning on/off a few options in the config file, try to find it

Hello, I found that in the new FreeBSD 9.2 (probably in 10 also) updated OpenPAM sources. The big embarrassment was in pam_get_authtok.c. The problem is that even without a valid SSH login it's possible to know the server's hostname. az at az:/home/az % ssh 1.2.3.4 Password for az at real.hostname.com: Changes made by "des":

This is a tired old topic but I've at least got an angle on it: Outlook Express works perfectly with IMAP / SPA for users logged into our Windows domain; I just give the server address and username, and it logs in without any password required; beautiful! auth_ntlm_use_winbind = yes auth_winbind_helper_path = /usr/bin/ntlm_auth auth default { mechanisms = ntlm userdb static { args =

Hi, though this is a bit of a side question, has anybody had an issue while running Outlook 2010 with Dovecot? The reason why I am asking is that I have setup a Dovecot 2.1.7 server on FreeBSD which works fantastically with Thunderbird but Outlook seems to be twice as slow in transferring information across?? # dovecot -n # 2.1.7: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE

Hi, I'm trying to setup one-time passwords on freebsd5.2.1 >From what I've read so far, if the user is present in opiekeys, the opieaccess file determines if the user (coming from a specific host or network) is allowed to use his unix password from this specific network. As my opieaccess file is empty and the default rule (as mentionned in the man file) is deny, I should not be

pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be reused for other domain numbers. Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). Replace pci_get_bus_and_slot() with pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() and extract the domain number from 1. struct pci_dev 2.

pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be reused for other domain numbers. Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). Replace pci_get_bus_and_slot() with pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() and extract the domain number from 1. struct pci_dev 2.

More on this ... I short-sheeted ntlm_auth to see what was being passed to it. It is getting as arg1: --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp I tried running ntlm_auth at the command line as: ntlm_auth --username=user --password=password --helper-protocol=squid-2.5-ntlmssp It did nothing, just hung there. The ntlm_auth man page says: --helper-protocol=PROTO Operate as a stdio-based helper.

+nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org On 11/27/2017 11:57 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > pci_get_bus_and_slot() is restrictive such that it assumes domain=0 as > where a PCI device is present. This restricts the device drivers to be > reused for other domain numbers. > > Getting ready to remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function in favor of > pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). > >

Okay, I guess I?ll be the first to take Colin Percival up in that the following statement applies to me: ?If you find a security problem -- or even if you find something which might possibly be a security problem but you're not certain if it is or not -- then please let us know.? I recently installed pam_radius according to the instructions located at the following address:

Is it possible that no one on this list is authenticating Outlook with Dovecot and NTLM? --Mark -----Original Message----- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:51:01 -0500 To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: Need to authenticate Outlook and NTLM From: Mark Foley via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> More on this ... I short-sheeted ntlm_auth to see what was being passed to it. It is getting as

I'm about ready to smash my head through a wall...I could use a few answers. 1. When using security = ads, and completing net ads join, it was my understanding that samba authenticated username/pword against ads, and local posix accounts were nolonger needed, is this true? 2. If yes, I have not been able to get it to work. If I have a posix user account with the same name as one in