similar to: Should we run Amavisd on our final delivery hosts?

CentOS-6.6 Postfix-2.11.1 (local) ClamAV-0.98.5 (epel) Amavisd-new-2.9.1 (epel) opendkim-2.9.0 (centos) pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1 (epel) Is there something going on in selinuxland with respect to clamav, amavisd-new and postfix? Since the most recent update of clamav I seem to be detecting more avc's. It may be that it is because I am looking for them more frequently but it seems to me that

CentOS-6.6 Postfix-2.11.1 (local) ClamAV-0.98.5 (epel) Amavisd-new-2.9.1 (epel) opendkim-2.9.0 (centos) pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1 (epel) /var/log/maillog Dec 11 16:52:09 inet18 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/perl from read access on the file online. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 62006e35-dcc8-4a4f-8e10-9f34757f3a4a Dec 11 16:52:10 inet18 setroubleshoot: SELinux is

Hi, I want to move my mail server from sendmail to postfix over christmas. I've got a test server running with the following: postfix dovecot postgrey amavisd-new clamav spamassassin I've followed the howto's on the wiki <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos> with the exception that I installed amavisd-new and clamav from the EPEL repo rather than rpmforge. Things work OK with

hey friends, I am trying to configure amavisd-new with postfix 2.1.5. amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1 clamav-0.88.2-1 there are no Razor or Dcc files on the system. I am getting this error when I try to send any mail. amavis[12095]: (12095-07) (!) PRESERVING EVIDENCE in /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20060522T180431-12095 May 22 18:04:31 cluster1

On 4/28/2015 1:40 PM, Tobias Franz?n <lists.zxinn at otaking.se> wrote: > On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote: >> On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >>> On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote: >>>>> LMTP adds a new Delivered-To:<rcpt-to at address> header when there is >>>>> a single RCPT TO. You

I've been following the instrunctions in <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd> for installing Amavisd, Clamav and SpamAssassin on top of postfix/dovecot . Dovecot is working fine, but I want to deal with spam email. (I am using sendmail/dovecot with procmail and spamassassin on another server, but decided to go over to postfix on this server when I saw it is now the CentOS default.)

hey friends, my problem is solved, the culprit was the typo mistake in master.cf file of postfix. Thanks & Regards Ankush Grover On 5/22/06, ankush grover <ankushcentos at gmail.com> wrote: > > hey friends, > > I am trying to configure amavisd-new with postfix 2.1.5. > amavisd-new-2.4.1-1.el4.rf > spamassassin-3.0.5-3.el4 > Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1 >

On Fri, December 5, 2014 04:53, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > On 12/04/2014 03:22 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: >> On Thu, December 4, 2014 12:29, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> Re: SELinux. Do I just build a local policy or is there some boolean >>> setting >>> needed to handle this? I could not find one if there is but. . . >>> >> Anyone see any problem

Trying to set up a mail server under CentOS7 - having done this with CentOS5 and CentOS6 over the last decade with no issues and reliable service, it was time to upgrade (?) to CentOS7. Shouldn't be a problem, right? Getting to grips with systemd has been challenging - to say the least. So a brief overview of what I am trying to set up: postfix / amavisd-new / spamassassin / clamav so we

I'm resurrecting this again because I'm getting pretty close to possibly being ready to install a brand new dovecot server (finally), but I still need for dovecots LMTP to add the x-original-to header. So... was this completed quietly, or is support for it still not there? Thanks, Charles On Tue Apr 28 2015 15:27:07 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Charles Marcus <CMarcus at

I have a problem getting spamd and sendmail (both stock CentOS4 rpms) to work together on a couple of smtp relay machines. This is clearly a configuration issue and no doubt revolves around my lack of comprehension of how this is to work. Basically, the setup consists of two frontend public smtp transports that redirect all email through a firewall to an internal imap server for final

I just checked the status of amavisd: # systemctl -l status amavisd ? amavisd.service - Amavisd-new is an interface between MTA and content checkers. ?? Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/amavisd.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) ?? Active: active (running) since Thu 2019-02-07 08:16:59 EST; 7h ago ???? Docs: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#doc ? Process: 5715

Hi List, I've been working on documenting an amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav installation for postfix on CentOS5 with regards to writing this up for the Wiki (with invaluable help from forum member WhatsHisName - thanks!). I hope to make a start on a Wiki page in the next week or so, so if anyone has any experience with this combo and would like to offer advice, tips and

On 2014-01-08 14:32, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2012-04-09 8:53 AM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> On 9.4.2012, at 15.50, Charles Marcus wrote: >>>> LMTP adds a new Delivered-To:<rcpt-to at address> header when there is >>>> a single RCPT TO. You can force a single RCPT TO from Postfix side by >>>> setting

Hello all, I just rebuilt my mail server with postfix and cyrus-imapd. Can anyone tell me how to setup spamassassin or amavisd for this? Thanks, James

On 22/08/16 02:10, Jay Hart wrote: > Hello gents, > > First time poster here! > > Current system running Centos 6.8. Buddy of mine posted a few days back about me wanting to move > from Postfix 2.6.x to 2.8 to above, still under centos 6.8. I might move over to 7, but probably > not for a while, don't have the resources presently to make this happen. > > Running

Hello all, I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but learned there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me which of the various spam fighting packages i.e., sa, sa-milter, clamav, clamave-milter, and so forth? I ran into

On Thu, April 2, 2015 17:11, J Martin Rushton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sorry to mention the "opposition" here, but I have a family member's > laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's > the current best recommendation? > Thanks, We (Harte & Lyne Limited) formerly used F-Prot out of

I acknowledge beforehand that this list is not the primary place to discuss these specific applications, but I am pressed for time and many of you have a great deal of experience with these two products. We have MailScanner configured to use SpamAssassin and it works exactly as we wanted. Up until now. I now need to allow messages classified as spam to be delivered to a single mailbox. I

When I try sudo yum install amavisd-new I get the message ------------------------- Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: perl(Unix::Syslog) Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: clamav-server Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: clamav-server-systemd Error: Package: