similar to: winbind stop working

Hi, When I use "valid users" in smb.conf to limit access on my share, I have this message with smbclient : [global] workgroup = MYDOM domain master = no local master = no security = user passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://x.x.x.x:389 ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com ldap suffix = dc=company,dc=com ldap user

I have a file server with two shares accessible to 2 different groups. After the last update ( from debian 2:3.2.5-4 to 2:3.3.2-1 ) i cannot any more access ONLY ONE of the two shares and I can't understand the reason! Can anyone hel me? I'm getting mad! Thanks Giorgio from smb.conf: [documenti_movi] path = /home/documenti_movi valid users = @staffmovi read

Hi, We have been running samba file server about 2 years without this problem. The problem appeared at the same time on our debian and centos servers. Not sure if it's related to any updates on our windows AD servers. Debian Squeeze sernet-samba-3.5.8-27 Centos 5.5 samba3-3.5.5-43.el5 Use Active Directory for user login authentication Use uid/gid from ldap The reason we still want winbind

Hi I have been working all week with samba 3.4.7 in Centos 5.5 PDC(3.4.7) with LDAP backend+Centos 5.5(3.4.7) BDC with LDAP slave. I already have 5 clients join. 1 Windows XP 1 Windows 7 UE 1 Centos 5.5 Desktop 1 Ubuntu 9.x 1 Centos 5.5 I can browse inside windows and see my clients, access some shares. I want to create private shares inside my PDC, I use: force group valid users write list

On 2015-11-07 at 17:47 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: > > > > Also, for all I know, the DC always has local unix user and group > > IDs, and does NOT use the rfc2307 attributes for this. (Unless > > this has changed recently, but I can't imagine how.) So there is > > nothing wrong with

Hi, I want to switch from 'security = server' to 'security = ADS'. Kerberos is working and I can login to the server. With Samba 3.0.22 I was able to restrict access to shares with the 'valid users' directive. ve is local unix group. valid users = +ve And force the group ownership with the 'force group' directive. force group = +ve [foo] comment = foo

Hello all, I recently upgraded from Samba 3.5.6 (the version contained in Debian Stable) to Samba 3.6.5 (the version from Debian Backports) in an effort to closer track the current development to try and chase some long standing bugs out. I think I've resolved one problem but introduced another. I'm getting the "WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND" when I try to perform a SID to UID

Hi there, I use FC5. I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members (Alan, Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine: valid users = @user But with 3.0.23c update it doesn't work anymore. You have to replace the line like this: valid users = Alan, Baker, Clive I mean, replace the "@groupname" with the complete userlist of the

System Summary: centos 6.2 samba 3.5 smbldap-tools 0.9.6 openldap 2.4.23 Hello, I am installing smb 3.5 on a CentOS 6.2 host using smbldap-tools. I've previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4 using smb 3.0 but CentOS now uses nss-pam-ldapd and nslcd instead of nss_ldap, so the configurations cannot be moved straight across. Currently, when I attempt to connect to an smb share

Hello all. We are running Samba 3.6.6 on a Debian 6.0.6 server. We made the upgrade from 3.6.5 to 3.6.5 about a week ago and ever since we have lost the ability to map Samba shares from our Windows XP SP3 and Windows 7 clients: Here's an example from my workstation (logging verbosity set at 10): [2012/11/29 15:23:58.120087, 3] smbd/process.c:1467(switch_message) switch message

Hi all, I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however the bug is supposed to be fixed by now. I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member to Windows 2003 domain. All my Windows users have accounts on the Samba machine, with the same user name in Windows and in Unix. I have a share with valid users = +group, where

Hi, I am trying to use squid proxy with validation on win 2003 active directory to filter internet navigation and for it I installed an ubuntu 10.04 server 64 bit with samba. My installation looks ok, the server is joined to the AD, ntlm is able to validate user, wbinfo report corret information and squid works good. The problem arise after some hours: winbind become not able to resolv info

I am attempting to get a Debian box running Samba 3.0.23d (latest from debian testing) to work with our shiny new Windows 2003 server PDC. I can join the domain. windbinds various wbinfo commands return all the groups and users, as does getent. I can access everything from the PDC. Effectively, everything works _except_ specifying a group to 'valid users'. My smb.conf[0] is run of the

Hello, I have a question because POSIX ACL with SMB2 max protocol does not work properly.Did you test VFS xattr acls with SMB2 max protocol? Is it working corectly? Best regards/Adrian Berlin --

Hello, ? I sent a previous message about this case, but I'm guessing I had too much info.? I'll try to keep it simple. ? I'm looking for ways to further troubleshoot this error: [cstelter at fedorabox system]$ smbclient //fedorabox/sys Enter cstelter's password: Domain=[STELTER] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.6-70.fc14] smb: > dir NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing * ???

Hi, I'm getting many errors in samba logfiles on file server, which is NT4 domain member. Centos 5.5, Samba packages from Sernet repo, version 3.5.6-43.el5. That error is: [2011/03/16 09:37:49.057565, 1] smbd/service.c:678(make_connection_snum) create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED What does that error mean? Everything is working correctly as far as i can

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Volker, Assume I have a member server named LINUX joined to a domain name AD. Now assume I have a local user named foo in my passdb and a user named foo in the domain as well. I'm modifying winbindd_util.c:parse_domain_user() to do a lookup_name() to try to figure out which domain to prepend to the username rather than just assuming its a domain

hello, I'm trying to migrate a rather simple configuration from a Samba 2.0.6 to Samba 2.2.8 , on an AIX system. smb.conf stays exactly the same & checked with testparm. File sharing works fine again, but not printing : smbd meets an internal error when a NT box tries to launch a print job. Sample of logfile : [2003/03/19 16:42:56, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(456) user_in_list:

In the course of upgrading from CentOS 5.4 to CentOS 5.5 I changed from using the samba (v3.0.x) packages to the samba3x (v3.3.8) packages, mostly because the newer version was said to better support Win7. The Samba server services Linux, WinXP, and Win7 clients. Now I get many, many errors logged to the Samba logs shortly after 3:00 AM, but only from the Win7 clients. I get roughly 430

Hello, I was previously using samba-3.3.3 on my linux machine. I could 'map a drive' from a Windows XP machine to access files on the linux machine. If I rebooted the Windows machine, and tried to access the share again by clicking on the mapped drive icon, I would be denied, but I would be given a prompt in which to type in a username and password. The samba log.clients on the linux