similar to: Samba4 with Posix ACL's

Hi, We've just put in a Samba fileserver to replace our windows box for our School District and it seems to be working great. I have a question about defining some specific permissions though. We set up 'Drop boxes' for teachers that kids can drag files into, but they don't have read permission so they can't read each others submitted work. Here's what is looks like on

Hi I'm trying to make a share called dropbox rw for members of a group. /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf [global] server role = domain controller workgroup = CACTUS realm = hh3.site netbios name = HH3 passdb backend = samba4 template shell = /bin/bash [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/hh3.site/scripts read only = No [sysvol] path =

Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu

Am 23.01.2015 um 10:19 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 23/01/15 07:34, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> >> Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>>> Hello,

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

Good Morning Achim, Follows the exit of the requested command. Now the GPO funny not work when user is only the ?Domain Users? getfacl /var/lib/samba/sysvol/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: var/lib/samba/sysvol/ # owner: root # group: 3000000 user::rwx user:root:rwx user:3000000:rwx user:3000003:r-x group::rwx group:3000000:rwx group:3000001:rwx

Hi all, I have a server that has ACL's enabled on it and the groups are set properly from the domain that are applied on top of it for the shared folders. I am running with Mac OS X 10.10.5 on the client side and am having nothing but issues with getting them to respect the ACL's set on the files. The Server Setup is as follows: Domain Server: Debian 7.9 with Samba 4.3.4 Member

I'm really struggling with ACL's and permissions. I have a share owned by a user (douglas). Douglas can read, write and create to the share: [public] comment = Public Stuff path = /home/samba/pub nt acl support = yes public = yes admin users = douglas write list = douglas I'm logged in to Win2000 as douglas. Through the security tab on Win2000 I add read and

I'm having trouble with my new fileserver, I can't make the shares viewable by windows clients. I had the same problems with the first file server I built and cannot remember what I did to "fix" it. I have gone through the page "Setting up a share using Windows ACL's" on the Samba Wiki ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs) but

Hi list, For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian with the following smb.conf: [global] server role = standalone server map to guest = Bad User guest account = nobody [test] path = /home/yvan/Partage/share guest ok = yes writable = yes inherit acls = yes I want "bob", "alice" and guest user to have full access to all files in this share, so I

I thought I had read a response to this. Went something like this: Word (and lots of others such apps) do not actually deal with the original file. They create a temporary file which overwrites the original when you save the new document. The 'new' file of course inherits the new editor's ownership. Hope this helps you. Noel -----Original Message----- From: Josh Konkol

I have the Win2000 client(s) in a Samba domain. Domain authentication works fine, my "homes" share works fine, remote profiles work fine. Using 3.0.1Pre1 I would like to add people to "someshare" through the Security tab, and control their access through windows ACL's. How should I setup a share as a basis for doing this? The share below (someshare) in this email

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Gary Dale <garydale at torfree.net> wrote: They already have full rwx privileges. I'm not sure if that worked or not, > or if it was something else I've done since last night but currently the > profiles seem to being saved even without the share being connected. > getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

On 8/24/2015 12:43 PM, Sébastien Le Ray wrote: > Hi > > setfacl -Rb /srv/samba/share > chown nobodycares:a group with SeDiskOperatorPriviledge /srv/samba/share > chmod g+rwx /srv/samba/share > > always did the trick for me > > Regards > > Le 24/08/2015 18:35, James a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> How do I reset default folder permissions? For

Hi guys, I'm having trouble setting up my file server running Samba 4 (4.0.3). I had no problem joining the domain (also a Samba 4 (4.0.3) with AD) but I can't get the ACL to work properly. I'm sure my settings are wrong and hoping for some help. When I try to set a user permission I get this error: setfacl -m u:administrator:rwx test3.txt setfacl: test3.txt: Malformed access ACL

OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator from idmap.ldb and restarted samba. Before restarting samba, I checked a few things, on the DC, getfacl returned this for

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

Le 09/08/2019 ? 21:36, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: > On 09/08/2019 20:18, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian >> with the following smb.conf: >> >> [global] >> server role = standalone server >> map to guest = Bad User >> guest account = nobody > That

On 20/02/15 21:27, Davor Vusir wrote: > > Rowland Penny skrev den 2015-02-19 18:15: >> OK, there is a discussion over on samba-technical about nss_winbind >> and the question about Administrator being mapped to 0 was raised. >> Now I have always thought that it should, but in fairness, I decided >> to see what happens when it isn't, so I removed Administrator

Hi, i'm experiencing a strange behavior in the way samba shows file and folders permissions under windows explorer. When i open the folder or file properties under windows (xp sp2 btw), it shows in the Security panel all the entries, both classical posix ones and posix acl ones; but if i select each one of them to see file permissions, it will show only the permission of users indicated