similar to: Partially transferred files keep locked for a while after client disconnected ungracefully

Hi, After trying too long I fixed the problem below by reverting to the old 3c905 NIC. Problem solved but not understood. I had a similar 3c2000 NIC in another Samba server and it also failed to copy a large amount (5000+) of files. So that's two completely servers (hardware and Samba / Slackware version) having the same problem with any number of different clients. I couldn't imagine

Hi, When trying to copy 5000+ files from a client PC to a Samba server I have the following problem. Halfway during the operation it hangs on always the same file. Windows XP (SP1) gives: Unable to copy file [filename]. Specified network name is no longer available. (I had to translate this from Dutch, so it is not the exact message). When checking with smbstatus I get this:

Hi everybody. Got Samba 2.2.7 on RH Linux 8.0.A on an old K6/200 machine. For the test I connected a win XP machine through a cross-cable and It works. I can explore the Samba share from XP, I can copy files and so on. But when I try to copy a specific file (it's a MS Access archieve about 1MB big) the copy process doesn't even start and, after a timeout, I get form XP the error:

We are having some problems in our company's test group that did not exist when our Clearcase 2003.06 server existed on a Solaris 8 machine. Now we are running on RHEL 5.2 with Clearcase 7.0.1.3 with Samba 3.0.28 (despite the fact that IBM has only blessed up to 3.0.24) and running into some file locking issues with some scripts our test group runs. I am hoping that someone might have some

Hi all, Here is the situation: I have 2 nodes MDS1 , MDS2 (10.0.0.22 , 10.0.0.23) I wish to use as failover MGS, active/active MDT with zfs. I have a jbod shelf with 12 disks, seen by both nodes as das (the shelf has 2 sas ports, connected to a sas hba on each node), and I am using lustre 2.4 on centos 6.4 x64 I have created 3 zfs pools: 1. mgs: # zpool

Without the GUID-Aliases list can debugging not continue? I don't see anything similar in the Gen9 UEFI command list http://h17007.www1.hp.com/docs/iss/proliant_uefi/v32403933.html#topictoc On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Derrick M <derrick.martinez at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Gene >

Gene, after modifying some of Patrick's code I have been able to get the EFI_GUID - 83F01464-99BD-45E5-B383AF6305D8E9E6 Does this give you the info you need? On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Derrick M <derrick.martinez at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Gene > > > > Thanks for the reply.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Derrick M <derrick.martinez at gmail.com> wrote: > Gene > > Thanks for the reply. I didn't have a guid command, and couldn't find the > equivalent. dh > fs0:\efi-dh.txt worked, but dh -p Net did not so I ran dh Nothing of the sort listed with the help command to list the full GUIDs and their aliases? > -d -v -p SimpleNetwork >

Hi there, Let me first tell you our setup.... I'm at a school (actually 2 but who is counting) with approx 1000 students in a NT domain. In the past we have had problems with students consuming more diskspace than was intended. First we tried to enforce a quota using kix, but the little 'rats' soon figured a way around that. To overcome that we started using an Linux setup with

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 08:42 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> Bringing the discussion to the list. >> >> You stated you see the following on your Lenovo ThinkPad T470s with >> UEFI firmware N1WET41W (1.20 date: 10/17/2017): >> >> >> core_udp_sendto: stalling

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Alexander Perlis <aperlis at math.lsu.edu> wrote: >> > Is syslinux.efi supposed to be able to handle HTTP URLs? >> >> If the underlying firmware can. Try just specifying an HTTP URL in the >> config or on the command line instead of the path-prefix option. > > > Doesn't work. Apparently the Dell UEFI PXE firmware

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 08:42 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > > Bringing the discussion to the list. > > You stated you see the following on your Lenovo ThinkPad T470s with > UEFI firmware N1WET41W (1.20 date: 10/17/2017): > > > core_udp_sendto: stalling on configure with no mapping > > > OUI 54-E1-AD > > lspci -s 0:1f.6 -v > 00:1f.6 Ethernet controller:

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 08:42 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Bringing the discussion to the list. > > You stated you see the following on your Lenovo ThinkPad T470s with > UEFI firmware N1WET41W (1.20 date:

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 08:42 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>> Bringing the discussion to the list. >>> >>> You stated you see the following on your Lenovo ThinkPad T470s with

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:03 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund >> > <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: >> > > On Mon,

Bringing the discussion to the list. You stated you see the following on your Lenovo ThinkPad T470s with UEFI firmware N1WET41W (1.20 date: 10/17/2017): core_udp_sendto: stalling on configure with no mapping OUI 54-E1-AD lspci -s 0:1f.6 -v 00:1f.6 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (4) I219-V (rev 21) Subsystem: Lenovo Ethernet Connection (4) I219-V

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:18 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund >> <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:03 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gene Cumm

On 2015-02-26 17:05, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:56:50PM +0100, Olivier Mauras wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:05 -0500, Laine Stump wrote: >> >>> On 02/24/2015 03:37 PM, Olivier Mauras wrote: >>> >>>>> Hello, I've been trying to boot a VM with the rootfs being a 9P share from the host. The VM OS is centos

Hello, > Le 28 nov. 2017 ? 00:39, Joakim Tjernlund via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> a ?crit : > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:18 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund >> <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:03 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > > What I've found: > (from older to newer hardware) > > 1) There's not "any" SB protocol present (Elitebook 8460p/2560p) The only solution for these is to use our own stack (likely full TCP/IP like lwIP) and connect to the Net GUID (EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_PROTOCOL). Does the