similar to: Hard breaks problem - tests attached

Hi, I''m using RedCloth right now for some simple markup in a Rails project. It''s simple and easy - thanks for a great tool! I have a question about an apparent discrepancy between RedCloth and Textile, relating to newline characters. I''ve played with the "hard_breaks" feature and that seems to generate it''s own problems.. If I go onto the Textile

Is :hard_break working in RedCloth 3.0.4? $ ruby -v ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i686-linux] $ pwd /lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/RedCloth-3.0.4/lib $ irb irb(main):001:0> require ''redcloth'' => true irb(main):002:0> rc = RedCloth.new("h1. Heading\n\n_Not_ heading.") => "h1. Heading\n\n_Not_ heading." irb(main):003:0>

Hello, I''m new to this list, so first of all, many thanks to RedCloth''s developers, it really helps me in many ruby apps :-) I post here because I''d like to have a clear view on "hard_breaks" related issues. I saw old references on the web and on the archives on this ML, I''d like a fresh view ! It seems that RedCloth 3.0.4 does not handle

Hi, I am using RedCloth (3.0.4). First using online text2html (http://www.textism.com/tools/textile/) , "123 456" returns <p>123<br />456</p> But by code: <code> require ''RedCloth'' puts RedCloth.new("123\n456").to_html </code> I got: <p>123 456</p> CR is not taken in consideration. Is there any parameter I am

hi! never posted to a mailing list before so I hope this is an appropriate use. Love redcloth btw! I guess I just have a bug report though... if I turn on hard_breaks and filter_html, all the <br />s turn into <br>s. weird. For now I''m just doing this which is fine: textilized = RedCloth.new(text, [ :filter_html, :hard_breaks ]) return

I have a few of patches for RC. A quick fix for a bug in clean_html, an improvement to clean_html to sanitize more links, and the addition of "filter_classes" and "filter_ids". What should I do? Email them to someone? why? (sorry, couldn''t avoid it) I actually don''t have separate patches for each, but could do them if needed. The first two are

Has anybody gotten :hard_breaks to work with RedCloth? I''m doing: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body).to_html(:textile) which works, except that it doesn''t transform hard breaks to <br /> tags, which is really important for me. However, if I do: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html(:textile) then it converts ALL breaks into <br

I maintain a web application frozen to version Ruby 1.8.6 and RedCloth 3.0.4 Whenever I insert a newline followed by a white space, SuperRedCloth, wraps the text with <pre><code> tags. Say for example I write ############### Hi This is me ############### This piece of text gets translated to <p>Hi</p><pre><code>This is me</code></pre>

Hi, I''ve been using the rassmalog static blogging engine and have encountered a stack overflow inside the redcloth regexp matcher. I don''t seem to suffer this error on my Ubuntu (Feisty Fawn) box (with Ruby 1.8.4??), but I do get it on my Gentoo system. Running the following line will generate it (I''ve attached the YAML/redcloth file to this message). $ ruby -ryaml

Hey guys. Is this a bug or what? >> RedCloth.new("First part -- middle part -- end part.").to_html => "<p>First part <del>- middle part -</del> end part.</p>" But http://textism.com/tools/textile/index.php says the output should be: <p>First part&#8212;middle part&#8212;end part.</p> Thing is, I *want*

Hi there, I haven''t looked at the code but will it be possible to add rel attribute to anchor tags in super redcloth? It would be great! ATM i have changed the regexp in redcloth to use curly braces as rel tag when writing textile. Since target attribute don''t validate in XHTML strict and i still want to open some links in new a window. Old style ---- Textile:

Hey guys, I have been working with RedCloth for the past week or so in order to try and upgrade a University''s blog system (blogs.warwick.ac.uk) to Textile2, having used a bespoke Java-based Textile1 implementation in the past. As such, it''s been an important part of this that it works as much as possible to give the same results for Textile1 code, but with the added features

Dear Dressers of RedCloth, I have a question: text = "Foo\nBar\n\nBaz" RedCloth.new(text, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html # => "<p>Foo<br />Bar<br />\nBaz</p>" Shouldn''t that really be "<p>Foo<br />Bar</p><p>Baz</p>"? So long, -- Christoffer Sawicki

Hi, I am writing some help about post formatting. I am using redcloth to format the text, and in a FAQ, also formatted with redcloth, I explain what to type to what to obtain. So, how could I escape ''*'', ''#'' & Co, to have an output like <redcloth> Type *word* to obtain <strong>word</strong> </redcloth> I tried "Type

1.) What is everyone''s preference on NCRs or character entities? Textile 2 uses decimal NCRs, so a less-than character becomes &#60; whereas RedCloth (3.04 and prior) used &lt;. What is your preference? It gets tough because &#39; (a straight single quote) doesn''t have a character entity equivalent. 2.) How do you feel about encoding characters like quotes

Any ideas on a good way to embed titles in a textile file? I am creating a number of textile files that i convert, one-by-one to html. I would really like to include the title in the file itself. I am talking about the <title> tag in the <head> of the document. It would be easy to add this in post processing based on the first h1 tag or the name of the file itself, but i was wondering

Hi all, I can dive into it and figure out why using hard_breaks breaks RedCloth parsing so badly since 3.0.4, but I was wondering if someone could point me to the right direction. Thanks! - Lucas http://rufy.com/

Hi Jason ! Hmmm, this is good and bad news: Good: ruby hooks means I could use a single pass to parse textile customizations in zena instead of running two parsers: nice. Bad: I have just switched to ragel for QueryBuilder to parse pseudo sql and I fear your shortcomings (if that''s an english phrase). Could you describe more precisely what you are missing with ragel ? I''m

Hello, Is there a patch laying around somewhere to convert Textile to LaTeX? (Instiki did/does this?) Or, better yet, is RedCloth 3.1 still in the pipeline? In ruby-talk 129874 (7 Feb 2005), why the lucky stiff wrote: > > Let me give you a roadmap of what to expect with RedCloth 3 > in the coming months. > > RedCloth 3.1 will focus on getting us diverse outputs.

Hey, and thanks for a great RedCloth! I have however stumbled upon a very weird bug. Have a look at this Textile file: https://gist.github.com/c75681ce99f8c2515ee6. I have two <notextile>-tags inside, but it still escapes single-quote to &#8216; in the first <notextile>-block, but not the last... Any reason why this would happen? //Magnus Holm -------------- next part