similar to: hard_breaks

Getting this when attempting to build 2.3.11.3 on CentOS 6: test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed: strcmp(str_c(str),"123\nfoo\n456\nbar\n") "" != "123 foo 456 bar " test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed: strcmp(str_c(str),"123\nfoo\n456\nbar\n") "" != "123 foo 456 bar " mail cache uncommitted lookups

Hi. /* The short version. */ Is there a way to mimic Postfix' "table search order" in Dovecot's LDAP configuration of pass_filter/user_filter? /* Here goes the detailed description :) */ Just to quote the http://www.postfix.org/virtual.8.html: --- TABLE SEARCH ORDER (...) The search order is as follows. The search stops upon the first successful lookup. (...)

hi! never posted to a mailing list before so I hope this is an appropriate use. Love redcloth btw! I guess I just have a bug report though... if I turn on hard_breaks and filter_html, all the <br />s turn into <br>s. weird. For now I''m just doing this which is fine: textilized = RedCloth.new(text, [ :filter_html, :hard_breaks ]) return

Hi all, I can dive into it and figure out why using hard_breaks breaks RedCloth parsing so badly since 3.0.4, but I was wondering if someone could point me to the right direction. Thanks! - Lucas http://rufy.com/

> Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:46:57 +0100 > From: Jens Gulden <mail@jensgulden.de> > Subject: Re: [Wine] Ugly menu/dialog font of applications, using > debian sarge and wine 0.9.8 and 0.9.22 > To: wine-users@winehq.org > Message-ID: <4545F441.4080606@jensgulden.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hallo Wolfram,

Hello! I have a quite strange issue with the Samba based NT domain that I administer. I've triet to search for the solution but none of the information that I had found seemed to work. The trouble is that I can't manage to setup a ntlm based authentication. It applies to both linux and w32 architectures. In the latter case I achieve some level of usability - I can login locally. If I try

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11656 Bug ID: 11656 Summary: Escaping broken with --files-from Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

I''ve found 2 bugs that produce (imho) incorrect rendering results: 1) The regexp for strong (*) and bold (**) is greedy, which produces very strange results. The simplest way to show the problem is to give an example. This is the original code: ===== Strong: Lets do a little test *t* this should not be strong *u*. Bold: Lets do another test **t** this should not be bold **u**. =====

Hello, I''m new to this list, so first of all, many thanks to RedCloth''s developers, it really helps me in many ruby apps :-) I post here because I''d like to have a clear view on "hard_breaks" related issues. I saw old references on the web and on the archives on this ML, I''d like a fresh view ! It seems that RedCloth 3.0.4 does not handle

After looking at the Livermore for a while, we found the issue that was causing LTO to produce a different result. Consider the code below [1]. setup() doesn't touch bar/baz, main() doesn't reference foo. LTO finds, correctly, that it can remove the setup(), but the result is different. The code is clearly wrong, but the compiler has no right to fix user's stupidity, even at that

What is a good way to enter a very long model formula. For example: y ~ Input.2 + Input.3 + ... + Input.1000 (assuming the corresponding dataframe has many other columns). Is there a way to convert a character string to a formula? Are there command line expansions in R besides the simple '.'? Thanks. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Renato, On 08/01/13 17:16, Renato Golin wrote: > After looking at the Livermore for a while, we found the issue that was causing > LTO to produce a different result. > > Consider the code below [1]. setup() doesn't touch bar/baz, main() doesn't > reference foo. LTO finds, correctly, I don't think this is correct. At the LLVM IR level it is valid to write into bar

do you know why when running wine-0.9.13 and all later versions of wine, finale displays squares instead of font characters and when running wine 0.9.12 everything displays ok? I have checked with wine versions that I have compiled from source on mandrake 10.0. The wine directory was left without any changes. thanks Piotr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi Duncan, Ok, I found that even if main() does reference foo, setup() still gets chopped off and the results is the unexpected: Foo: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Bar: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Baz: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 So, while there is the issue in LTO, I still think Clang could give a warning. This is a source of buffer overflow

Hi all. We have a win32 application linked to Far Point's Spread32 library; the application crashes when referencing a NULL pointer returned by GlobalLock, but obviously it runs perfectly under win98SE (see previous post about GetWindowLongA) . The behaviour of SCROLL_GetPtrScrollInfo, with nBar parameter = SB_CTL, is to return wndPtr->wExtra as it were a pointer. Actually we found that,

On 15. Aug 2020, at 14.18, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > > Getting this when attempting to build 2.3.11.3 on CentOS 6: > > test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed: strcmp(str_c(str),"123\nfoo\n456\nbar\n") > "" != "123 > foo > 456 > bar > " > test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed:

Hello All, first post to the list. I just checked out trunk and it broke my tests. Turns out that the BREAK_RE regex found in base.rb is missing the "/m" mode modifier. I am still getting my head around the library so i may be missing something but was that done on purpose? Thanks. jeremy Index: base.rb =================================================================== --- base.rb

Hi, Earlier this year I "upgraded" from wine 20010510 to 20011226 in order to see if some kind of resource leak was fixed which caused screen redraws to get progressively slower and slower and slower and slower, .... That was fixed but there seemed to be a significant number of graphics and UI regressions. I've just upgraded to 20020228 to see if things were any better and within

Hi, I''m using RedCloth right now for some simple markup in a Rails project. It''s simple and easy - thanks for a great tool! I have a question about an apparent discrepancy between RedCloth and Textile, relating to newline characters. I''ve played with the "hard_breaks" feature and that seems to generate it''s own problems.. If I go onto the Textile

Is there a shortcut for this: "http://foo.com":http://foo.com ? Thanks, ---John