similar to: CR issue

Hey all, is there a way to wildcard field searches? As in: - a document like {:title => ''foo'', :description1 => ''bar'', :description2 => ''bar2''} I''d search: index.search("description*: search query") I understand the example above is silly, but it''s enough to make the question understandable :-)

Hello, I need to use barplot' graphs, but under the graph I need to put different things. The structure of this graph must be: MY GRAPH ------------------------------------------------------ description 1 ----------------------- ------------------------- description2 description3 where: -description 1, description 2 and description 3 are

Hi, I''m using RedCloth right now for some simple markup in a Rails project. It''s simple and easy - thanks for a great tool! I have a question about an apparent discrepancy between RedCloth and Textile, relating to newline characters. I''ve played with the "hard_breaks" feature and that seems to generate it''s own problems.. If I go onto the Textile

Dear R-list users: I would like to import a database of web robots, http://www.robotstxt.org/db/all.txt, it?s formatted RFC-822, ?how can I do it? The RFC 822 specification defines a standard format for electronic messages, which consists of a set of header fields and an optional body. The headers contain information about the message, such as to whom it is being sent, from whom it is being

Hello, I''m new to this list, so first of all, many thanks to RedCloth''s developers, it really helps me in many ruby apps :-) I post here because I''d like to have a clear view on "hard_breaks" related issues. I saw old references on the web and on the archives on this ML, I''d like a fresh view ! It seems that RedCloth 3.0.4 does not handle

Hi, I''m having some problems with redcloth(3.0.4 gem) and textilize. I have a string: "h2. hello _what''s up?_" which is being textilized as: <h2>hello<br /> <em>what&#8217;s up?</em></h2> so no paragraph and h2 wrapped all the way. the input is coming from firefox 1.5.2 on a mac Anybody got any idea what the problem might be? --

Getting this when attempting to build 2.3.11.3 on CentOS 6: test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed: strcmp(str_c(str),"123\nfoo\n456\nbar\n") "" != "123 foo 456 bar " test-mail-cache.c:176: Assert failed: strcmp(str_c(str),"123\nfoo\n456\nbar\n") "" != "123 foo 456 bar " mail cache uncommitted lookups

I''m having a problem formatting some text. I have a textarea that I input my text into, which will then be put into an e-mail and sent out. The problem I am having is when there is a single line break. Multiple line breaks work fine (hitting enter twice), but single line breaks don''t seem to work properly. Take the following input: Line1. Line2. Line3. Line4. Using

Has anybody gotten :hard_breaks to work with RedCloth? I''m doing: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body).to_html(:textile) which works, except that it doesn''t transform hard breaks to <br /> tags, which is really important for me. However, if I do: self.body_html = RedCloth.new(self.body, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html(:textile) then it converts ALL breaks into <br

Hi all, I can dive into it and figure out why using hard_breaks breaks RedCloth parsing so badly since 3.0.4, but I was wondering if someone could point me to the right direction. Thanks! - Lucas http://rufy.com/

Hi, when doing: render :update do |page| page.replace_html ''suggested_contractors'', :partial => ''contractors'' page.visual_effect :highlight, ''suggested_contractors'' end I got js as output, it is not executed, return html *contains*: try { Element.update("suggested_contractors", " \n 12345678910\n \n

Hi, I am writing some help about post formatting. I am using redcloth to format the text, and in a FAQ, also formatted with redcloth, I explain what to type to what to obtain. So, how could I escape ''*'', ''#'' & Co, to have an output like <redcloth> Type *word* to obtain <strong>word</strong> </redcloth> I tried "Type

Hi, I am just wondering if there are already some ROR certifications, and if yes, what is the rails core opinion? Thank you Jean-Etienne - http://www.novAgora.hu -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

For me, textilize(stuff) produces nasty stuff - <br>''s instead of enclosing <p>''s and some closing <h*>''s are missing. RedCloth.new(stuff) works fine though. Isn''t textilize supposed to produce the same output? Or do I need to tweak something? Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> $ rake test > /usr/local/bin/ruby -Ilib:test "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ > rake-0.7.3/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/test_formatters.rb" > "test/test_parser.rb" > Loaded suite /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.3/lib/rake/ > rake_test_loader > Started >

Hi, I''m using textilize with redcloth 3.0.4. Everything works best except that paragraphs are not translated as an HTML paragraph When I write something like: *first paragraph* second paragraph the output is without paragraph: *first paragraph* second paragraph Any help??? Thanks Jörg

Hi, all. I haven''t felt at liberty to go axing test cases, but some of the 33 that are failing now are ones I don''t think we want to pass? cruft coming from Markdown or made up to fill a gap some years ago. I''d like to float the proposition that we make Super (and thus RedCloth 4) behave as identically as possible to Textile2 as working on

Dear Dressers of RedCloth, I have a question: text = "Foo\nBar\n\nBaz" RedCloth.new(text, [ :hard_breaks ]).to_html # => "<p>Foo<br />Bar<br />\nBaz</p>" Shouldn''t that really be "<p>Foo<br />Bar</p><p>Baz</p>"? So long, -- Christoffer Sawicki

Hi, When doing a ''rake migrate'', schema_info is not updated (it does not contain any row). Migration is done properly the first time, but fails the second time I run it, since there is no info in schema_info. I am running rails 1.1.2, using script/generate migration to generate the migration file. Any help? Thank you. Jean-Etienne http://www.novAgora.hu -- Posted via

New gems (source and win32): gem install superredcloth --source http://code.whytheluckystiff.net Use it like: SuperRedCloth.new("_huh?_").to_html Okay, getting close! A lot more tests are passing. There are still about 50 tests failing. Most of these are due to ol/ul list problems. Here''s what''s still broken: * Options (:hard_breaks, :filter_html, etc.) *